EDITORIAL: Five Reasons ANT-MAN Might Not Suck

EDITORIAL: Five Reasons ANT-MAN Might Not Suck

Marvel Studio's Ant-Man is a film ridiculed by many, with a large portion of fans having already written it off as a disappointment. But, in the spirit of seasonal positivity, I've decided to jump to its defence, and present you with 5 reasons to not write off the little guy just yet. Enjoy!

Editorial Opinion
By PaddingtonBear7 - Dec 27, 2014 02:12 AM EST
Filed Under: Ant-Man


So, 2014 is drawing to a close, and we’ve already begun to look ahead to the massive year of movies that is 2015. Among other things, next year will see new entries in the Star Wars, Terminator and Jurassic Park franchises, the return of Pixar, the 24th James Bond adventure, the end of the Fast & Furious franchise and the re-assembling of The Avengers. But amidst all of these titans of cinema jostling for attention, there’s another film that perhaps hasn’t got the attention it deserves. This film has been mired in controversy for most of the year, due to numerous departures from the source material, possible studio interference and changes in the ages of characters. No, I’m not talking about the Fantastic Four reboot. I’m actually talking about Ant-Man, the 12th film offering from Marvel Studios and quite possibly their most controversial.

A large portion of fans have already written off Ant-Man as a disappointment. The most controversial point is the film’s numerous departures from its source material- Hank Pym is now 70, Darren Cross is Yellowjacket, Janet Van Dyne will either not appear or will die in the 60s etc. There are other reasons, but most of the hate for the film comes from these changes. But I can’t help but think about all the CBMs who have departed from their source material and still emerged strong- take any X-Men film for example. So, in the spirit of seasonal positivity, I’ve decided to present 5 reasons why Marvel Studio’s Ant-Man might not suck. Keep in mind that this is just my opinion- I’m not trying to force you to be excited for the film, I’m merely trying to get people who have already written it off to maybe rethink their position a little. Anyway, enough blabbering from me, let’s get started.

5. Fleshing Out The MCU

One of the good things that came out of making Han Pym be in his 70s in the present-day MCU is that we’ll get to see him as a 60s superhero. If you look at the MCU timeline, there’s a pretty huge gap between Cap in WW2 and Iron Man, and this film would help to fill that in. We’ve already learnt that the movie will feature a flashback scene in the 60s where Pym will encounter the likes of Arnim Zola, Peggy Carter and Alexander Pierce. Well, what if the movie decides to go one step further and show us Pym (and even possibly Janet) in action?

This I think would not only be really cool to see, but would also serve to answer some un-explained questions. For instance- we know the Avengers Initiative existed long before Iron Man, Hulk, Thor et al were on the scene. But since the aim of the project was to bring together a team of super-humans, there must have been some super-humans around in the past for them to come up with this idea, such as Hank and Janet as Ant-Man and Wasp. Also, when Nick Fury says to Tony Stark in the post-credits scene of Iron Man ‘You’re not the only superhero in the world’, this doesn’t make sense, as at that point in time, he is (bar Cao, but he was frozen). So having Hank as a 60s/70s superhero would help to answer some unanswered questions and flesh out the mythology of the overall MCU.

4. A Talented Cast

Paul Rudd as thief Scott Lang is a great choice. The guy can pull off a struggling, charming family man, and has done so in numerous other movies. Looking past the age differences, Michael Douglas is a great actor able to pull off almost anything a writer can throw at him, and is perfect for the grouchy, cynical, world-weary take on Hank Pym they appear to be going for. I still have no idea what ‘Hope Van Dyne’ will be like, but Evangeline Lily is a talented actress  who has plenty of experience playing intelligent, resourceful and self-assured female leads, so I’m certain she’ll do a great job.

On the more villainous side of things, Corey Stoll is another actor who always delivers a stalwart performance, and I hope he brings the same sort of gravitas to the role of Darren Cross as he did in House of Cards. The film will also see the return of MCU veterans such as Hayley Atwell as superspy Peggy Carter and Toby Jones as Nazi scientist Arnim Zola. These actors are all solid in their roles, and it’s good to see them come back.

3. Awesome Visuals

Ant-Man may be a character ridiculed by many, but the concept of a size-changing superhero opens up the door to some awesome visuals and environments. To a man who’s only a few centimetres tall, every-day environments can be fraught with danger. Small objects that would never seem threatening to us normal-sized human beings could become obstacles and traps for Ant-Man. The description for the SDCC trailer describes Lang standing in a ventilation shaft with dust particles swirling around him. This sounds like it would be awesome to see, and is just one of many awesome shots we could see if the film takes full advantage of the possibilities opened up by a miniaturized superhero.

Another aspect of the visuals for this movie is the costume design, which so far has really impressed me. The Ant-Man suit looks like a perfect blend of functionality, high-tech and comic-book inspiration. Here it is:

 
Yellowjacket’s suit also looks pretty awesome. While it may look markedly different from its comic book counterpart, the suit is impressive in its own right. They’ve kept the yellow-and-black colour scheme whilst also succeeding in making it look realistic and cool. The arms on the back may be a new addition, but I like them- they emphasise the insect vibe and also seem useful and practical to the character. Here it is:

2. Peyton Reed & Adam McKay

I know many people are still hung up on Edgar Wright & Joe Cornish leaving, but hear me out. I realise many people think Reed is just a no-talent yes man, but consider this- who would’ve thought before Winter Soldier that Anthony and Joe Russo- whose only previous directing credits were You, Me And Dupree and a few episodes of Community- would end up being handed the reins to Avengers: Infinity War, the massive universe-spanning two=part epic conclusion to over a decade of Marvel movies featuring almost every character in the MCU- and that people would support it?

Reed also has past experience on CBMs- he was originally set to direct Fantastic Four, and contributed many ideas to an ultimately scrapped but stellar script that perfectly captured the spirit of the F4 and their personalities. If he can bring a similar level of passion and playfulness to Ant-Man, we could be in for a treat come July 2015. Adam McKay doesn’t have previous with CBMs, but he’s a great writer anyway. He’s written plenty of smart yet hilarious films (notably both Anchorman movies), and could provide a level of intelligence and wit to the film’s script that will help it stand alongside MCU greats such as Iron Man and The Avengers.

1. Marvel’s Track Record

I know this isn’t a point exclusive to Ant-Man, but it’s still valid nonetheless. The fact is, Marvel hasn’t yet made a horrible film. Sure, there are some that are simply ok or mediocre, such as Iron Man 2 and Thor:TDW, but Marvel have yet to produce a stinker like Catwoman, X-Men Origins: Wolverine or Green Lantern. Marvel’s films are always entertaining- they’re never boring, they don’t get bogged down in exposition or needless melodrama and the characters are interesting and funny. And with a talented cast and creative team, why would they break that streak here?

Coming off the mega-success of Guardians of the Galaxy, Marvel is pushing ahead with some more risky projects. Ant-Man presents numerous opportunities for Marvel to do things differently- a heist movie element, diverse environments inside normal settings, a superhero-hating mentor character. Marvel got where they are today by being willing to take risks- hiring an ex-drug addict to headline their first movie, choosing directors not from the blockbuster movie catalogue, casting relative unknowns as fan-favourite superheroes and more. And every time, the risk has paid off for them in a big way. If Marvel are willing to take the same sort of risks with Ant-Man, I’m confident they’ll be able to produce one of their best movies yet.

So, those were five reasons why Ant-Man might not suck. Disagree with my points? Have any of your own? Feel free to voice your opinions in the comments below. That's it from me for now. I've been PaddingtonBear7, and thank you for reading.

ANT-MAN Star Evangeline Lilly Says She Has No Contractual Obligations Following Decision To Quit Acting
Related:

ANT-MAN Star Evangeline Lilly Says She Has No "Contractual Obligations" Following Decision To Quit Acting

ANT-MAN Star Evangeline Lilly Confirms She's Stepping Away From Acting - What Does This Mean For The Wasp?
Recommended For You:

ANT-MAN Star Evangeline Lilly Confirms She's Stepping Away From Acting - What Does This Mean For The Wasp?

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

tonytony
tonytony - 12/27/2014, 3:32 AM
your main point is that its marvel. thing is marvel films are not terrible but they arent great. Im1 avengers and Winter soldier are the only genuinely good movies. the wirst being cap1 im2 and thor 2. This movie has had so many problems it deserves its criticism.
MightyZeus
MightyZeus - 12/27/2014, 6:03 AM
I'm still nervous about Ant-Man that it may not succeed with audience's even though it has the "Marvel Studios" logo and brand attatched to the movie, Ant-Man could be ridden with plot holes, terrible writing and maybe some unfunny cringe worthy jokes thrown in aimed at teenagers but that's just what 12% of me is thinking.

The rest of me is thinking, this Ant-Man movie actually seems really cool. I mean the main focus will be placed on Scott Lang a better Ant-Man in my opinion and more relate-able and less alienating towards audience's because he has a daughter and he might come off as a thief with a heart of gold. The writing may be clever and witty. The costume design may come off as stylistically awesome along with the special effects. This whole news about Ant-Man actually made me give a damn, i remember when i told people about Ant-Man people would just be like "psshh Ant-Man what is he a Spider-Man wannabe" and i'd just shake my head but in the end i love Marvel for taking risks even if Ant-Man is a small time hero i think that Ant-Man will be a big time hero among fans and audiences and honestly who cares about the changes from the source material these days everything is making change's from the source material so deal with it.
tonytony
tonytony - 12/27/2014, 6:59 AM
@paddingtonbear your response is an example of deviation. I never mentioned anything about deviation (read my response again. I know i did) i said this movie deserves its criticism. Also i never said anything about lighter or darker tone. I just like good movies, thor 2 for example is not lighter than avengers but it is certainly (in my opinion) a worse movie. Also source deviation is not very important to me as long as we get a good movie. But this movie's (Ant man ) creation has been a well documented mess and people are justified in being concerned about the quality of the final product.
sikwon
sikwon - 12/27/2014, 8:54 AM
I've never, ever, liked Ant Man or Giant Man in the comics in any of his iterations. Saying that I'm looking forward to this movie. Personally I think all of the production "troubles" have worked out for the best, just like in Batman vs Superman. I think Edgar is a great director and he would have knocked a standalone marvel movie out of the park I think that's ware the problem was...
sikwon
sikwon - 12/27/2014, 9:00 AM
No marvel movie is truly stand alone. The cause and effects of each characters life has an effect on the entire mcu. I truly don't think Wright was onboard with that. Remember his Antman vision predated the Avengers. There was just no way that 13 movies in, 3 seasons of AoS, numerous 1 shots etc that marvel could make a character stand completely alone. It comes to the same type of problem with introducing Spidey in Civil War. He's been doing his own thing. I really think Edgar wasn't willing to male the changed needed to fit the larger MCU or to flesh out the MCU's past. And people hate IM2... it really wasn't that bad.
01928401
01928401 - 12/27/2014, 10:55 AM
@tonytony
Well then you'll be happy to know that Iron Man 1 had a horrible production period and Jeff Bridges himself, one of the greatest parts of the film, potentially the parallel to Michael Douglas in this case being that they are both very talented and seasoned actors,
01928401
01928401 - 12/27/2014, 10:56 AM
has admitted that it was like working on a student film. There is no such thing as deserved criticism until the final product has been revealed.
nilzzz
nilzzz - 12/27/2014, 2:26 PM
There is one thing which stills bugs me about this movie. I just wanna know about the 60'ies flashbacks, who's gonna play Hank Pym. In the cast listed on IMDB I didn't find any actor who could pull this off. So there are two choices then. Use Michael Douglas made younger with CGI or a suprise, uncredited actor (like Matt Damon in Interstellar) which don't know about. That's the only stupid thing has my curiosity. In general I'm pretty excited about this movie.
DrKinsolving
DrKinsolving - 12/27/2014, 3:37 PM
I can't wait for Ant-Man, I think it will Rock.
Baka
Baka - 12/27/2014, 3:38 PM
@OmegaDaGod
01928401
01928401 - 12/27/2014, 11:41 PM
@omarvls
It didn't make that much because it was an amazing film. It made that much because it starred Robert Downey Jr facing off against what was announced to be his arch-nemesis in an epic final showdown after the immense success of the greatest team-up movie in cinema history. If I saw that movie, I would not be typing this. I would probably be typing an argument for why Iron Man 3 was the best in the MCU. Instead, I'm having to explain why the only reason I didn't walk out of the theater was because I was hoping and expecting an awesome mid-credits scene, which they also failed to deliver.
[frick] Iron Man 3.
MellowDrama
MellowDrama - 12/28/2014, 2:18 AM
@0megaDaGod

Bravo! Bravo!! Well said.
Lhornbk
Lhornbk - 12/28/2014, 8:49 AM
I have no objection at all to deviating from the source material, especially since some of the source material is stupid (I really hope they do NOT show a flashback of Pym hitting his wife.) And I really have no objection to using Lang instead of Pym (in fact, I kind of enjoyed watching all the Pym fanboys sputtering when they found out that Pym wasn't the main character, lol.)

But, I have serious doubts about this movie for one simple reason-it's a movie about ANT-MAN. And Ant-Man is one of the dumbest characters ever. Oh, and yes, Marvel will eventually have a flop. No studio has a perfect record (see The Lone Ranger for Disney, lol) and Marvel will eventually have a flop too.
NitPicker
NitPicker - 12/28/2014, 9:06 AM
@Lhornbk

I know right! They also made a movie with a walking tree and a talking raccoon. How stupid are they?
Darkknight2149
Darkknight2149 - 12/28/2014, 2:55 PM
Since Edgar Wright left and they decided to keep the current release date in order to rush it into theatres, my expectations for Ant-Man have not been high (not to mention how Patrick Wilson was written out). At BEST, I'm expecting this film to be on par with the lackluster Iron Man sequels. I'm still excited for Phase 3 after this film, though (Civil War! Captain Marvel! Inhumans! Black Panther! Infinity War!). If Marvel has their first flop anytime soon (every studio has a flop eventually if they exist long enough) then Ant-Man will be it.
View Recorder