Kenneth Branagh On Sharing Marvel's Universe

Kenneth Branagh On Sharing Marvel's Universe

Kenneth Branagh says seeing Thor early in post production may have affected not only the way Whedon presented Thor in The Avengers but Loki's involvement in the film as well.

By Hawksblueyes - May 26, 2011 06:05 AM EST
Filed Under: Avengers
Source: alibi.com

The folks at Alibi.com talked to director Kenneth Branagh via a phone interview just after THOR opened recently. Much of what Branagh had to say has been said, and reported dozens of times and we have all heard it. However, he did have some interesting things to say on how the various Marvel directors are connecting Marvels "shared" universe.

Joss Whedon is in Albuquerque now, in your wake, shooting The Avengers. Did you have any advice for him in carrying on the storyline?
.

We talked particularly about the way our movie was shaping up, and we had Joss see it pretty early on in post-production. I think that affected both the way he presented Thor in Avengers and also Loki’s involvement in that story as well. He also spoke to me about the whole “Marvel Universe” and the whole atmosphere before he joined, anyway. So it’s actually a pretty nice, collegiate atmosphere between these Marvel directors. I think everybody’s very sympathetic with everyone else. And if you can help out, you try to. I got a very nice card from Jon Favreau [director of the Iron Man films] yesterday wishing me luck for our premiere in Hollywood. That’s been pretty typical of the generosity between the directors.

That’s got to be fun, playing in the same universe as other directors you know.

I certainly found it’s nice to share a few war stories. I would walk out of my 3D shot reviews during post-production for Thor, and I’d run into Joe Johnston [director of the upcoming Captain America: The First Avenger], and it was always nice to have a chat with him. And also to know—in ways I can't really reveal the full details of—ways in which our story might potentially have some kind of payoff in Captain America and, indeed, in The Avengers. That was fun, because that’s part of what, as a viewer, I very much enjoy about this unique Marvel film universe. And I think the other boys do as well.
By: TwitterButtons.com

By TwitterButtons.com
Samuel L. Jackson Reflects On His Original Nine-Picture Deal; Still Hopes To Take Nick Fury To Wakanda
Related:

Samuel L. Jackson Reflects On His Original Nine-Picture Deal; Still Hopes To Take Nick Fury To Wakanda

Marvel Studios Executive Explains Why THE AVENGERS Won't Assemble In A Disney+ TV Series
Recommended For You:

Marvel Studios Executive Explains Why THE AVENGERS Won't Assemble In A Disney+ TV Series

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
Hawksblueyes
Hawksblueyes - 5/26/2011, 6:11 AM
;P
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 5/26/2011, 6:23 AM
BRANAGH should be on THE AVENGERS!

Awesome find @ Hawks! ; )
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 5/26/2011, 6:45 AM
Intruder @ Cool lol!

Seriously IF we want an amazing shared MARVEL UNIVERSE!

FOX needs to go and we need SPIDEY, GHOST RIDER and NAMOR back too!

Imagine FANTASTIC FOUR, X-MEN etc at Marvel Studios!!!

All I can say is WOW!
Shaman
Shaman - 5/26/2011, 6:54 AM
Intruder- Branagh would have upstaged Hopkins as Odin, with both hands tied. He's that damn good. Hopkins was a good Odin, but i felt he didn't nail it as much as i had hoped. I'm sure Branagh would have. The man exudes passion for his work like none other, where as Hopkins brings massive intensity no doubt, but without oozing out as much passion i find. He's always passionate about his work for certain, he just doesn't translate it to me as much as Branagh does. When i watch Hopkins in a role, i feel he keeps his passion for himself. But that's just my opinion.
Rosso
Rosso - 5/26/2011, 6:56 AM
It would be interesting if Marvel got the rights back to Spiderman and the X-Men entities.

But I don't see that happening any time soon.

Sony is rebooting Spiderman, which will bring in large numbers at the box office and if we like it or not Fox is making bank on the X-Men.

However, if we boycott these franchises the studios will lose interest in them, thus they will stop making them and then only then will Marvel be able to buy them back.

Or the much faster way, Marvel could yelp to its parent company Disney and get the ball rolling a bit faster.

Still we need to boycott Spiderman and X-Men (I do not really care about Ghost Rider).
supercajun
supercajun - 5/26/2011, 6:57 AM
I would love to see spidey swing around and run into Thor or Iron man.
actionjackson
actionjackson - 5/26/2011, 6:58 AM
@Intruder, when did Marvel get Namor back? I must have missed that memo
actionjackson
actionjackson - 5/26/2011, 7:00 AM
Also, there has got to be some way that Disney and Sony can work out an agreement to allow Spidey to be in the shared universe with Sony getting the rights for the solo movies and Disney getting the rights to use him in the shared movies/universe and have some profit sharing scheme with it as well.... FOX is another story though, they are complete douches!
EarOne
EarOne - 5/26/2011, 7:06 AM
i just hope each of the directors' egos won't get in the way, as time moves on... i'm still curious who would they pick, if they decide to do another Hulk solo movie?
how about Guillermo del Toro?? he's pretty good in the weirds and monsters...
actionjackson
actionjackson - 5/26/2011, 7:06 AM
@Intruder, that's awesome, I didn't realize that Universal had the rights to Namor in the past. Well, hopefully he will be used cinematically sometime in the next 5 years!
BIGBMH
BIGBMH - 5/26/2011, 7:10 AM
@Rosso, A fan boycott won't get us anywhere because we make up such a small percentage of the viewers. I really wish there was something they could work out. Maybe even not have the characters on screen together but just mentioned. The Daily Bugle can exist in the MCU. There can be newspapers in the Spider-man movies that show MCU characters on the front page. Would that really kill anyone?
If only they could have worked out a deal to let Hugh Jackman cameo as an unnamed soldier in Captain America. It would have been a win-win. Why, oh why could they do it?!!!
Orphix
Orphix - 5/26/2011, 7:14 AM
The fact of the (shared universe) matter is that Marvel Studios still have relatively small budgets to work with and Disney will always want a profit for their investment. As a result I don't think there is a reason or a desire to get back some of the bigger Marvel properties under their stable.

I think Marvel are quite happy to have Spidey at Sony and X-men at Fox. Making movies is an expensive business and Marvel makes enough money out of those properties from the Sony and Fox pictures.

If Marvel Studios had the movie rights to all their big league characters we would only see them in films once every 10 years!
Orphix
Orphix - 5/26/2011, 7:16 AM
I have often wondered though if their is a way in which a collaborative deal could be worked out between the big studio houses.

But then would it be seen as cannon? Would there be a point? If Marvel Studios doesn't have complete creative control it could proove awkward for future projects?
ThaMessenger07
ThaMessenger07 - 5/26/2011, 7:18 AM
Didn't read this article but I want to see if I can even post a comment now.

Edit: I can awesome! This was great. I think I read this before, still a good read.

I feel that people are not realizing how amazing the concept of these films are. The general public does not quite get it yet. It will sink in next year when promo starts to come about.
Hawksblueyes
Hawksblueyes - 5/26/2011, 7:22 AM
Orphix: Marvel Studios still have relatively small budgets to work with. That's not true at all. I have been reading peoples comments saying that and that is not the case. I reported last year that Marvels film budgets will be restructured to include "big budget films" $150 mil and over or "mid budget to small budget films" $50 mil and under, no middle of the road stuff for them.
actionjackson
actionjackson - 5/26/2011, 7:26 AM
@Orphix, Hawks, and BIGBMH... like I said earlier "There has got to be some way that Disney and Sony can work out an agreement to allow Spidey to be in the shared universe with Sony getting the rights for the solo movies and Disney getting the rights to use him in the shared movies/universe and have some profit sharing scheme with it as well.... FOX is another story though, they are complete douches!"
Shaman
Shaman - 5/26/2011, 7:30 AM
Intruder- I did love hopkins in Thor. In fact, i think as a whole, it was his best performance yet. But i don't know how to describe it, i feel like his performances, as believable as they are, are kinda... i dunno, "cold" might be a good word to describe them. It's like, there's nothing... "extra", that comes out at me from them, except his unshakable talent of course. When i see him angry, i don't see the fire burning through his angre. I just see an angry man, believably angry yes, yet just angry. For example, the scene where he yelled out a gruntlike "HEYRGH" at Loki for speaking out of place in regards to Thor's actions... well both me and my girlfriend were giggling our asses off, as silently as we possibly could, since we didn't want to disturb everyone else in the theater LOL That reaction really shouldn't have happened in that very serious scene. Branagh has the ability to let transpire such a genuine passion through him instead of just acting the emotion. It's like i can see him go the "extra" mile where very few actors can, no matter how talented and experienced they are. You can't really learn that, but all this is again merely my opinion. I'm sure it's relative to the beholder ;)
ZombieOverEasy
ZombieOverEasy - 5/26/2011, 7:33 AM
@TheMessenger07 Nah dude, your comment isn't showing up.

@Hawksblueyes Where do people get this idea? Is it because of the false rumor about Avengers budget cuts? Or is it because of pre-Disney budgets?

Fox will continue to churn out X-Men flicks to keep that licensing. Same with Sony & Spiderman. As long as the movies make them money, they'll try and hold on to that license. I'd love to see a Marvel Studios based X-Men film and I'm sure eventually we will, just not within the next decade.

I think it would be awesome to someday sit down and watch a FF movie or New Avengers movie thanks to a shared cinematic universe. Although I know alot of people aren't fans of New Avengers, I was.
Orphix
Orphix - 5/26/2011, 7:34 AM
Hawksblueeyes @ I hear what you're saying BUT relatively speaking they are a small studio. Hence the reason they can only make one or two films a year.

They are not in the same league as one of the big 6 who can churn out many films (including a large number of blockbusters) a year.

However since they have been bought up by Disney they can be seen as a subsidary studio much like Fox Searchlight is to Fox or Sony Pictures Classics is to Sony. This certainly gives them the bigger budgets for the one or two films they do. But they still have to pay their way - which so far they are managing to do. :o)
Hawksblueyes
Hawksblueyes - 5/26/2011, 7:38 AM
ZombieOverEasy: I get this idea because it was in a press release from Disney some time back in regards to Marvel studios. They are concentrating on big budget and low budget films.
Shaman
Shaman - 5/26/2011, 8:08 AM
Intruder- Yeah, i gotta give you that one. He was splendid as Hannibal where he brillantly does display the passion i was speaking of. I've probably seen both Silence and it's sequel only once each, which is why i never remember him by those. I've seen Mask of Zorro so many times since i love the [frick] out of it, so i always remember him from that one instead. And then there are his other performances in between like The Edge, Instinct and plenty of others where he's just "good" but not spectacular to me as much, where i'm sure his fans would surely disagree. In Thor, he had a similar performance to the one he had in Zorro, but slightly better.
f4rrel
f4rrel - 5/26/2011, 8:22 AM
marvel shared cinematic universe sucks. After seeing what they're doing so far I'm glad they don't have the rights of the rest of their characters because it would just make it worse. Movies, with the exception of Iron Man, are lame and the multiverese continuity is forced all the time. Sure, as a fan, is a big thing, an unprecedent event what they're doing, but as a film and comicbook lover I just see a wasted opportunity.

Remember: not a big deal, it's just a point of view from an internet blogger. no need to get angry at me fanboys =p
dahamma
dahamma - 5/26/2011, 9:09 AM
This guy is reponsible for the greatest and my fav marvel movie to date, yes he should be in the avengers lol Thor was frikkin sick
marvel72
marvel72 - 5/26/2011, 9:38 AM
you gotta love what marvel is doing with there films,dc are improving but we do need more characters out of you.

sony are alright as well,not as bad them arse holes at fox.
Shaman
Shaman - 5/26/2011, 9:42 AM
Intruder- Hahahahahahaha!!! Good one! That actually made me chuckle out loud in the office LOL But yeah, i get what you're saying. I may not comment a lot, but i sure do read a lot of comments LOL ;)
niknik
niknik - 5/26/2011, 10:02 AM
Not sure why people thought Namor would have been locked in as the property of Fox to start with. I know recently they have been touting him as "The First Mutant" in the books and even associating him with the X-books, but that is something fairly new in respect to the long history of this character. Keep in mind there are 72 years of history related to Namor here. It would take very little effort to dispell this newly created link to mutantdome and go back to being simply the human/atlantean hybrid he was for more than 60 of those years.

If he's no longer a part of the "mutant" group in the books and is presented as a non-mutant once again, than FOX has no claim. They could no more claim his rights for that than they could for his reemergence in the silver age in the Fantastic Four books. He predates all of that. He's a golden age character of the greater Marvel Universe as a whole. Marvel has always had his rights if they wanted them. Just disassociate him from the X titles and point to his long history as a non-mutant to be safe.
CaptainAmerica
CaptainAmerica - 5/26/2011, 10:17 AM
I don't want Marvel to get the rights back to X-Men or Spider-Man. They have enough characters to worry about and adding Spider-Man and the X-Men to their slate of movies would just take away from the other characters they have. I'd rather Fox make X-Men movies, Sony make Spider-Man movies, and Marvel focus on theirs. It would also lower the chances of getting Marvel to do lesser known characters like Doctor Strange, Guardians of the Galaxy, Namor, or Runaways.
Shaman
Shaman - 5/26/2011, 10:28 AM
ELgUaSoN- Not when angry at Thor, when he yelled out at Loki. It was damn funny how he just exploded at him, not even muttering a real word.
Ghostt
Ghostt - 5/26/2011, 10:50 AM
Not a huge Hopkins fan. Having said that, his performance sent chills up my spine at times.

"You are unworthy of your title, and I’ll take from you your power! In the name of my father, and his father before him, I cast you out!"

"You are a vain, greedy, cruel boy."

good stuff. and Hemsworth kept up with him.
Shaman
Shaman - 5/26/2011, 11:59 AM
Ghostt- Yeah, Hemsworth really impressed me in this. IMO, he was definitely the best performer of the bunch.

ELgUaSoN- Well... that depends. You see, when i yell at my kids because i'm angry at what they said or did, i'm pretty much on the mark for what words i use. But whenever i do stumble out non-words, i kinda snicker at myself. So that scene to me was hillarious LOL
paulyd3
paulyd3 - 5/26/2011, 12:42 PM
Stop using that lamo poster! This is much better. Show the Hulk in all huis greatness !~!!

14945L
Shaman
Shaman - 5/26/2011, 12:50 PM
EasterBunnyKiller- I did at first until Intruder reminded me of Silence of the Lambs which i hadn't seen in ages. His performance in that topped his Odin portrayal but nothing else he's done, i find. If you don't agree with that, then your generation sucks.
Hawksblueyes
Hawksblueyes - 5/26/2011, 1:19 PM
paulyd3: I made it, I'll use it whenever I damnwell want to.
HULK2099
HULK2099 - 5/26/2011, 5:43 PM
Is it me or every day some bad involving the avengers comes up
ManThing
ManThing - 5/26/2011, 5:46 PM
@ Shammy & Truedy: Personally I think Tom Hiddleston upstaged the lot of them!

I mean there was a lot of great talent, and some amazing acting. But that guy that played Loki just struck me as being amazingly natural. he seemed "gifted" so to speak.

I would like to see him in more movies
ManThing
ManThing - 5/26/2011, 5:52 PM
@ Niknik: it's because when it was last talked about it was Universal that had the movie rights to Sub-Mariner.

But talk of a film was so null and has been for so long, people forgot about that and just assumed that 'all the mutants" meant Namor as well.
Ghostt
Ghostt - 5/26/2011, 8:05 PM
@juggernaut

agreed. Hiddleston was amazing without doing much. bright future there. for him and Hemsworth
1 2
View Recorder