EDITORIAL: Will The Dark Knight Rises Carry the Magic?

EDITORIAL: Will The Dark Knight Rises Carry the Magic?

For the passed thirty plus years, there have been some excellent trilogies, and then there have been some disappointing conclusions to ones. So with a week til the opening release of The Dark Knight Rises, one question has been scratching on everybody's cerebellums...will Nolan's Batman step into the realm of excellent trilogies?

Editorial Opinion
By sonofsamadams - Jul 12, 2012 11:07 AM EST
Filed Under: Batman

It began with Star Wars back in 1977.



Lucas gave us the start of an unforgettable Trilogy. Dazzling audiences with amazing visuals, memorable characters that would stick to them after they left the theater and an ending that closed very well. Now I know in one of my previous articles said Return of the Jedi was #5 on my most disappointing list, but after giving it some thought, the ewoks may have been greatly unneeded, but they weren't too disappointing to land it at that # 5 spot. After watching it recently I concluded: Return of the Jedi overall wasn't up to par to its predecessors but it still was a great ending nonetheless. It wrapped many story lines up, left a few open for sequels in the future (if there is any), and left fans loving Lucas...until 1999. Star Wars redefined the word 'Science Fiction'


After Star Wars departed, some thought they would never again see a great trilogy like it again. But a year after Return of the Jedi, Temple of Doom hit theaters. In my opinion, I thought it was a spectacular movie, and it carried on the Indiana Jones Trilogy, one that redefined the word, 'Adventure'. Harrison Ford played an iconic role that Tom Selleck passed up. (Thank god) With excellent direction by the legendary Steven Spielberg, Indiana Jones dazzled audiences the way Star Wars did, a refreshing break at the movies. With a great ending with The Last Crusade (My personal favorite), Indiana Jones was just as Iconic as Star Wars, but not near as popular.

Over the next twelve years we as the audience became witness to several trilogies that failed to reach the heights of Indy and Star Wars. Trilogies like Back to the Future, Die Hard Jurassic Park (it had the worst closing on this list), and even The Next Generation of Star Trek. But in late 2001, we got one that dared to rival Indy and Star Wars.


Lord of the Rings once again brought a dazzling masterpiece to the audience with three well crafted and honorable movies that received a ton of Oscar Nominations and awards. With this, Peter Jackson entered the realm of best directors in history with his 3 stunning movies Fellowship, Towers, and King. We as the audience will forever love this trilogy and we are currently anticipating the arrival of the much needed 'The Hobbit'. Lord of the Rings is as good-if not better-than Indy or Star wars. LOTR redefined the word 'Fantasy'


Then we the audience again saw a few more trilogies fail. The Matrix, X-men, Terminator, and Spider-man all could have been awesome trilogies but instead their third installments came to a shameful close. It was a shame to see that happen because the first two films for all of those trilogies were great and/or iconic in my opinion. Those trilogies redefined the word, 'disappointing'


But...The Bourne Trilogy ended in 2007 and once again brought back the magic to the screen. The best action trilogy to date, toppling over Die hard and Lethal Weapon (LW 4 isn't a movie. Its a TV movie) in money and in popularity. Delivering awe-inspiring visuals, suspenseful plots, and memorable performances, The Bourne Trilogy redefined the word, 'Thriller'. Matt Damon was perfect for this lead roll and Paul Greengrass gave us two awesome Bourne Movies that stuck to their source material like glue. Its a shame that Ludlum couldn't see them.


Now here we are...with a new trilogy coming to a close. Nolan's batman.
It Began, then it went into Knight, and now it Rises again. Batman Begins made us forget the Joel Schumacher failures and gave us what Batman should have been all of along. Haters can hate all they want, but it looks more apparent that his trilogy will be the best CBM trilogy to date (and possibly the best for years to come)

With the 'Rise' of many extremely positive reviews, some generating Oscar buzz for Nolan, and some even predicting it to have the biggest non-3D opening ever, I ask you, what word will The Dark Knight trilogy define?

thoughts? comments? let me know folks!

About The Author:
sonofsamadams
Member Since 5/17/2011
I'm not a huge Comic Book Geek, but the super hero movie genre has always excited me, and always will. I do not enjoy when people argue over CBMs like they're a religion, but i guess thats how most movie geeks are.

oh and if i had to really pic a side,
i mean really really really had to, then
DC, baby :)

but i really don't care about which is best. they both make me happy
TRANSFORMERS Star Megan Fox Seemingly Confirms Poison Ivy Interest After Viral Photo Dump
Related:

TRANSFORMERS Star Megan Fox Seemingly Confirms Poison Ivy Interest After Viral Photo Dump

Alex Ross Variant Covers for JLA/Avengers #3 And Avengers/JLA #4 Deliver Ultimate Marvel/DC Crossover
Recommended For You:

Alex Ross Variant Covers for JLA/Avengers #3 And Avengers/JLA #4 Deliver Ultimate Marvel/DC Crossover

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

HouseSnow
HouseSnow - 7/12/2012, 1:19 PM
I'm calling this will be the first oscar winning comic book movie ever
Zarog
Zarog - 7/12/2012, 1:55 PM
You used "redefine" way too much....
sikwon
sikwon - 7/12/2012, 2:39 PM
i noticed something in youre article (outstanding by the way)... star wars, bourne, lotr, and the matrix (much of what ruined the matrix were the casting changes, rushed feel of the film and fishburn acting like he just didnt care) all have something that some of the other triliogies didnt have... the same villain. terminator had the same villan, but like matrix it got to full of itself. the dark knight rises has the same villain as batman begins. im aware that the dark knight didnt have the league of shadows but the final installments return to the league as being the heart of batmans antagoinst ties it together nicely. the key here is that when its done well, a trilogy that features the same nemisis to the hero (or heros) captivates because it allows the audiance to see just how formidable the villain really is. a movie like terminator or the matrix stuck to the same villain but they strayed so far from the original and the fimls felt like they were adding onto the story as they went along as opposed to a series like star wars that felt like one complete story that requires 3 films to tell. keeping the same antagonist lends a scope to the story. the lord of the rings was long but the journey, the scope and effort that was required to defeat sauron was apperant in the shear effort it took to defeat him. as an audiance we felt triumphant when frodo, after all that he had been through, still had the strength (and courage to cast the ring into the lava. im not saying that keeping one main antagonist is essential for a successful trilogy, but clearly it helps.
Jaywing
Jaywing - 7/12/2012, 5:52 PM
Great article!
antonio
antonio - 7/12/2012, 7:16 PM
Very good article!
ralfinader
ralfinader - 7/13/2012, 6:45 AM
"For the passed thirty plus years,..."

Good write up, but almost didn't read because of this flaw at the get go. It should read: "For the past thirty plus years..."

And RotJ was a weak-ass ending to a trilogy when compared to Empire. So far the strongest trilogy of the ones listed above is LotR, but that was written in a trilogy format. Bourne was good too, and strayed pretty far from the source material by the third to make it an almost original work. Matrix really fell apart by the third movie, IMO, and that hurt the overall series for me.

I think it's safe to say, based off the strength of Nolan's first two Batman movies alone and the buzz about the third, that he has made a solid trilogy.
Tainted87
Tainted87 - 7/13/2012, 10:27 AM
Matrix had a great villain - Agent Smith. The scene where he tells the other agents to leave him and Morpheus alone in the first one - awesome. Problem is, (and this is a whole 'nother can of worms) the Matrix shouldn't have been made into a trilogy.

The same can be said about Terminator, although Judgment Day will always be my favorite.

Taking revolutionary ideas (even if they are cherry-picked) that introduce new concepts to the sci-fi movie genre, and exploring them through commercial continuation is the big mistake. Imagine if there wasn't a trilogy, quadrilogy, etc... and just one standalone movie... how would it affect the quality of the movie industry?

If sequels were banned, there would be so many great movies. That is not to say that sequels aren't able to surpass the original (Empire Strikes Back, Terminator 2...) but I think we would have a far more imaginative future ahead of us, where quality matters and movies can't be redeemed for their mistakes in follow-ups.
View Recorder