Why I Think Christopher Nolan's Batman 3 Will Be Cancelled

Why I Think Christopher Nolan's Batman 3 Will Be Cancelled

I am prepared to be hated on, but I will stick by my opinion that Batman 3 will be cancelled...

Editorial Opinion
By GiFF - Sep 22, 2010 02:09 PM EST
Filed Under: Batman


In a business setting, there are two seperate ways Warner Bros. can go with this Batman film franchise... for one, they could do Batman 3, which everyone has been clammering for ever since The Dark Knight and would seemingly be the best decision to do at this point. But then again, The Dark Knight can arguably be considered a great ending to the Nolan films, and Warner Bros. could just reboot the films and start from scratch.

As many of us all know, Christopher Nolan is a director that wont take crap and when he directs a movie, boy he will direct it wherever he wants it too go through his vision no matter what everyone else thinks. For instance, the fact that Nolan wont let his realistic Batman take part with the more unrealistic heroes such as Green Lantern, and even Superman, and Nolan is going to be behind the upcoming Superman right now.

I dont know, but that just shows he really could not give a crap that Batman should belong among these other heroes, as we all know he should based on the comic books.

One of the major problems with Nolan in this respect, is that Warner Bros. is the studio and can just fire him. At this point, it seems like Nolan wont take any requests from Warner Bros. - just his own personal wants.

See, Warner Bros. has reportedly been optimistic that The Joker should take part in Batman 3, but of course with Christopher Nolan still pressed on Heath Ledger's death, there is no way in hell Nolan would bring The Joker back in his films - per his confirmation that he wont be bringing The Joker back.

But for a big studio like Warner Bros., that is really for the most part trying to raise money, would look at that as foolishness considering how big The Joker has become.

Most people would be fine with Nolan's intent of not bring Joker back, as I am, because of course many of us really respect Heath's take and at least we will get to see another villain introduced as fresh blood in the franchise, and also another actor replacing Heath in the role would seem pretty disrespectful... even though Heath would probably have pushed for someone to carry on his role.

Keep in mind, I am really only referring to the idea of an actor actually replacing The Joker in Nolan's continuity, if they rebooted the films I would be all for The Joker being around.

Honestly, being that Batman 3 is going to be a major cash cow obviously, Warner Bros. is going to be all over this film once they see something Nolan wants to do and they dont agree with it, just watch - Warners and Nolan are both going to get into major disagreements and Warner Bros. will just scrap it, wait, and reboot it in a few years with a director that we have never heard of.

The fact that Batman 3 also does not seem to be going forward at all, aside from having a release date apparently, seems like there could be problems going on.

This is just a theory, but it at least seems to me that whenever you have a project as big as the sequel to The Dark Knight, trouble is just around the corner for it... Batman 3 should be released on July 20, 2012.
ABSOLUTE BATMAN #4 Recap And Review - Filler Or Necessary Context?
Related:

ABSOLUTE BATMAN #4 Recap And Review - Filler Or Necessary Context?

BATMAN: GARGOYLE OF GOTHAM #3 Recap And Review - More Answers Create More Questions
Recommended For You:

BATMAN: GARGOYLE OF GOTHAM #3 Recap And Review - More Answers Create More Questions

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

bleedthefreak
bleedthefreak - 9/22/2010, 2:34 PM
you bring up some good points but they will no doubt make a sequel. I don't care for Nolan but i would see another one of his bat man movies. But if they did reboot i sure as hell wouldn't make a fuss about it.
P862010
P862010 - 9/22/2010, 2:41 PM
only problem grif is he did'nt just ride off the whole police force is after him that is a huge loose end
Denn1s
Denn1s - 9/22/2010, 2:52 PM
loose ends and lots of money. no way they are cancelling it...
davidbatmanfan
davidbatmanfan - 9/22/2010, 2:54 PM
Nolan just needs to learn open his mouth to public a little so we all know whats going on.
AlReg
AlReg - 9/22/2010, 3:01 PM
All Nolan is is very secretive he does not want to talk about something to early and somehow the internet community think they are entitled to know when he has no obligation other then making a movie.

Look at his last two films there is no way WB is going to micro manage him or demand things from him now. We are going to see Batman 3 news when the creative crew is ready not because fans demand it.
Protonite
Protonite - 9/22/2010, 3:11 PM
Didn't they have some sort of 'conflict of interest' about whether or not to go 3D on the third movie? But I'm 100% sure WB are not going to cancel a hot property like Batman 3. They're too much of a greedy bunch of schmucks for that to happen.
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 9/22/2010, 3:12 PM
WTF lol?!?

Btw dude stop putting your EDITORIALS in NEWS! ; P


Wheres GRIF?!?

TheDarqueOne
TheDarqueOne - 9/22/2010, 4:12 PM
Interesting point of view there GiFF.

To those who think the Studio will not get in Nolan's way do you remember Spider-Man III perchance? They know how many people will show up to see Batman III but they might want more.

I think that Nolan is simply involved with Superman right now. Which for me is a little scary because every time I try to picture a Nolan Superman what I see is not very pleasing. His Batman movies are great I admit. But I have come to the conclusion that Nolan does not understand SuperHeros the way everyone here does. For Batman this was fine since Bats is not superpowered. Superman is the other end of the spectrum and that is quite a different thing. Superman is not human and I wonder what that will do to Nolan's view of the film.
TheDarqueOne
TheDarqueOne - 9/22/2010, 5:01 PM
@Sooner09

Originally they did start out more with 'leap tall buildings in a single bound' than flying but that did not last long. Those are the very first comics back in the late 30s. Over the years he did slowly gain in power until Byrne came along in 1986 to reboot him. That was mostly a clean-up from times when nobody kept real track of what anybody could really do. Byrne did however remove Krypto from the mythology. As an adult I totally get that but the little kid in me was very unhappy about it. *grins*

That is a possibility I suppose. If he powered down Superman quite a bit he would be far less of a god and far more human'ish. I would find that approach a bit depressing myself. Superman has been a modern day god for my entire lifetime and I prefer that version.

But I don't think that solves the fundamental problems. He is not human and his point of view is unique. It is a SuperHero's point of view.


TheDarqueOne
TheDarqueOne - 9/22/2010, 5:52 PM
I have tried to deduce possible answers to that question ever since I heard he had creative control over the Superman reboot.

Many possible answers suggest themselves but nothing unique enough to appeal to Nolan is really clear.

He wants to bring him into today. What if Superman was not received well by the public? What if instead of cheering him they were afraid, hostile, or worse? You know treat him like the alien he is? He would have to work to earn their trust and it would not go well.

That is the sort of angle Nolan would be looking for. The problem is that it would create a Superman far removed from the original. But Nolan seem to care more about the essence of the Character than the details.

What you are looking for is not some long answer. It is not about Villains and those details. It would be a few short sentences that describe an overall concept like the above paragraph. I wish I knew the answer because at least then I would have some idea what this movie is going to be like.
TheDarqueOne
TheDarqueOne - 9/22/2010, 6:11 PM
Back to the topic at hand...

I have been reading some of Nolan's interviews. He only talks about one film at a time but he does slip in comments on others now and then.

The main reason Nolan thinks he will do Batman 3 is that he wants to end the story. Not entirely sure what he means by that but I don't think I am gonna like it. But since this is a Batman adaptation not the real deal I am sure it will be an very watchable movie.

Would even Nolan kill Batman at the end?
secretasianboy
secretasianboy - 9/22/2010, 6:27 PM
i have a weird feeling it will suck
batman 3 is to nolan
as
batman and robin the boy wonder is to frank miller

but if he kills of batman than we have no choice but to reboot
RoscoeFolgers
RoscoeFolgers - 9/22/2010, 7:52 PM
Christopher Nolan made them nearly 2 billion dollars with Dark Knight and Inception. Whereas none of the Marvel team-up films have grossed as much as either of the previously mentioned films. There's no proof that the movie universe thing works.

There is, however, proof that crossing over can potentially hurt your movie.

Nolan's given them two giant hits, they'll give him all the freedom he wants for Batman 3. Look at it from a business standpoint, would you pick the thing that's almost sure, or the thing won't make you an extra cent and could potentially hurt the quality of your product?
TheDarqueOne
TheDarqueOne - 9/22/2010, 8:07 PM
"Killing Batman is just fanboy speculation based on.."

Are you always this rude or is it just when you are online? Nolan said he wants to end the Batman story and I was speculating on what that could mean.

@RoscoeFolgers

Have you heard the story of Spider-Man III? They had a sure thing too and they did indeed do things that hurt the quality of the product. It is very typical Hollywood. They know they will get X number of people no matter and they are quite willing to risk the quality of the movie to get more.

Not saying it is going to happen but thinking that it cannot is simply ignoring history.
jd55
jd55 - 9/22/2010, 8:27 PM
Seeing as the movie is in pre-production, you are wrong. I will never understand why comic book geeks gossip so much. You guys spread rumors faster than old ladies at the hair salons.
thetrubatman14
thetrubatman14 - 9/22/2010, 9:55 PM
good point man.
haha hopefully they dont but if they do lets pray they make a another batman trilogy with a NIGHTWING!!!
npatil
npatil - 9/22/2010, 10:11 PM
absolutely not! there is plenty of material to keep going, it isnt all about the joker.

i see batman 3 ending like inception did, where you create your own idea as to how it ends---meaning batman will fake his own death truly making him a legend that never dies. the films can continue on with a new director and actor.---or nolan changes his mind many years from now and does a frank miller dark knight returns
SandMan101
SandMan101 - 9/22/2010, 11:31 PM
For all those people who keep complaining that Nolan shouldnt direct superman because his movies are too realistic, let me remind you of inception and prestige! Two freaking brilliant movies! Both were totally unrealistic, but they were made in a way that was completely believable. Even the whole dream within a dream within a dream thing in inception. So im sure he is going to do a great job with supes. Better than bryan singer did thats for sure.
ace995
ace995 - 9/23/2010, 1:28 AM
I cant believe some people have said they dont care if nolan directs another batman, 'THATS CRAZY TALK'. Of course he's gonna be directing batman 3. Just because he doesn't talk about the movie 24/7 doesn't mean it's not gonna happen. Nolan is a thinker NOT a talker, thats why every movie he makes always has a SUPERB storyline and they keep on getting better and better and better. Batman 3 is gonna be a stunning movie, regardless of who the villian is.....because Nolan focuses on detailed storylines. so stop all this negativity AND LET HIM DO HIS THING......BATMAN 3 IS GONNA BE AMAZING
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 9/23/2010, 9:34 AM
right...they'll cancel a sequel to the 3rd biggest money making movie of all time...
TesDaGreat
TesDaGreat - 9/24/2010, 6:56 AM
blueorangeny
blueorangeny - 9/24/2010, 10:51 AM
Here we go again another topic that continues to be beating with a stick like a dead horse.

I still don't see the realistic and non-realistic. The only reason why everyone continues with the realistic shit is because Nolan while filiming Batman Begins claimed his own version. All this shit can be amended, blended into 1 universe. Batman is still human, has no super powers and relies on other things to get ahead. Either in cartoons, movies or tv shows. I'll ask you this, how realistic was it when Batman fell off a 50 story (at least) building with Rachel and landed on a roof of a car. He didn't use any rope or parachute. Watch that scene and tell me how realistic that can be. Again let's get off this realistic and non-realistic bs talk. If Nolan and DC/WB want to merge the universe they will do it. It cost more money, time and possible risk starting fresh again.
blueorangeny
blueorangeny - 9/24/2010, 10:52 AM
I think at the end we will all be surprised on how it comes to life.
kyle
kyle - 9/24/2010, 3:41 PM
i respect ur claim, but i have to disagree. see, no one would screw nolan over like that cus they respect his decisions. it was even confirmed in a interview. now, that the joker isn't coming back; which i cud care less if he did, does not bark the end of the triliogy.
chris also stated he is working on the draft his brother gave him. therefore, bat 3 can't be greenlit cus an official script isn't completed. BLACK MASK AND TALIA AL GUHL IN THE FINAL BATMAN! why, cus he wants to end it where there can be no more unanswered questions. talia al guhl is the daughter of ras, and since fox left black mask can come in. BLACK MASK (DANIEL DAY LEWIS) AND TALIA AL GUHL (MARION COTIALLARD). DO IT DO IT DO IT DO IT
flames809
flames809 - 9/25/2010, 6:37 AM
why would wb reboot this franchise to more comic book way if batman works in a realistic way why reboot it doesn't make no [frick]ing sense cause look at the past batman movies they were more towards the comic book didn't work well do you guys want it back to that? and is to early for batman to cross over to other dc films cause is batman early years not late years.

blue- im with you on what you said this new batman movie combine realism with non-realism which is batman. which makes me thing how bale batman can't work in jla movie if wb decides to do one because batman in the cartoon never had powers and they don't think bale batman can work in a jla movie cause is to real.

TheDarqueOne- "he problem is that it would create a Superman far removed from the original" i don't get what you trying to say.
JustinMSalvato
JustinMSalvato - 9/26/2010, 1:22 PM
eh?

HotHead
HotHead - 10/10/2010, 8:15 PM
Roscoefolgers & deaconblackfire, actuly its fox & sony whove been popin S**t at some of the biggest marvel charecters while marvel themselves have actuly gotten dumptrucks of money with the secesus of iron man 1 & 2 and tih and are going to get even more when thor & cap come out next year and the avangers in 2012 and when the rest of the universe is introduced, al this time dc properties such as jonah hex,losers,superman returns, have endeded up losing more money then it took to make them while other projects like wonder woman,super max,shazam,flash,& justice luegue mortal have failed to take off because of how much the studio changed them that the directers relised they sucked and left the projects & with no replacements they scraped the picturs along with chris nolan who started out as the studio's saver hase ended up becoming the studio's biggest handicap by preventing bat & supes from interacting with the rest of dc. also dc only has two cash cows,sups & bats,while green lantern,flash,& wonder woman ocupy the backround. in contrast because marvel has barly shown the majority of its charecters to the outside world,each property has the potencial to earn big by talking the audience by suprise. so keep in mid next time you think that crossovers suck especialy when whedon & marvel is going to earn at tresure when the audince is on the edge of thier seats because whedon is pushing boundries to beyond the limit by forcing them to work together while the jla is what wb needs in order to earn a second harry potter level franchise, also im not like you guys in dissing the other side for i wish the best of luck to thor,greenlantern,& captain america in 2011 & the avengers ,batman 3,& superman in 2012.

anyway cuting to the chase this film along with nolans superman & his carrer at wb are on a
View Recorder