The Black Panther Movie Should've Came In Phase 2

The Black Panther Movie Should've Came In Phase 2

Why haven't we already seen the king of Wakanda by now?

Editorial Opinion
By WakandasSoul - May 23, 2015 04:05 PM EST
Filed Under: Black Panther
Source: ComicBookMovie.com

Hello fellow CBM users, I'm back again.  I've had a lingering thought on my mind the past few days about the Black Panther solo movie and I decided to make an editorial. Before I even get started I just wanna make clear this article isn't meant to be a rant, I just have this opinion I'm gonna lay down and am curious to know what you guys think.

Basically, I have a few reasons why I feel the BP solo should have definitely been a Phase 2 movie. For one, it would've certainly been quite easier to bring T'Challa into Civil War, had he and Wakanda already been introduced.



I mean, it's just very peculiar to me how T'Challa may be involved in the conflict of Cap 3 given the circumstances. We're gonna see him fighting, BEFORE we've even seen Wakanda? Wakanda is an isolationist nation that won't hesistate to BEHEAD trespassers if they choose to. Will we witness T'Challa outside of Wakanda before it's introduced? Because that's very off to be honest. It's an isolated nation with an isolation-minded ruler and people, they don't really have a reason to deal with any foreigners because they don't care to. I know about the rumor of him hunting down Bucky...but I don't know about that either. I don't see a reason for him to hunt down Winter Soldier although I will say, my gut instinct tells me given the situation that'd be the best way out of all to include him in the story. But let's say they do give us some Wakanda in Cap 3, even if just a tease or cameo of the nation....to me that shouldn't come in a Captain America movie, esepcially since it's the very first time we're seeing it. And definitely not in a movie based on Marvel's Civil War event. Wakanda is such a huge concept and setting, a good amount of the focus of the script would have to be temporarily placed on that aspect just to involve T'Challa (assuming they would show Wakanda).

So if he had already had his solo in Phase 2, the isolationism would've been established. Fans would see the glory of the nation that is Wakanda, how powerful, inpenetrable it is, etc. THEN he meets Cap, whether that be in a mid/end credits for the BP movie itself, AOU, or at the very beginning of Civil War it doesn't matter. Then he becomes an Avenger like he did in the comics, then he's a puzzle piece to the Civil War story. Personally I'm just of the mindset giving characters their own movie before merging them into the ensembles is undoubtedly more efficient and the better formula. It allows part of their story to have already been told, their world has been presented, we know a lot about the character, etc. That's a big part of the beauty of what will be Civil War next year. We'll be watching a major conflict between characters we've seen develop over the course of several movies. Black Panther should've been more cemented in that regard. Instead, we have T'Challa's first appearance in a Captain America movie, with Hydra villains, the Civil War storyline (we haven't even seen Wakanda yet) and his debut solo doesn't come until 2018. It was SUPPOSED to be 2017 (don't even get me started on those damn Spider-Man pushbacks lol) but yeah, no Panther until 2018.  That's long overdue is you ask me, especially for such a strong black lead, which me always need more of.

TWO SPOTS PHASE 2 BLACK PANTHER SOLO COULD'VE WENT

#1 : 2014's Guardians of the Galaxy Slot

Why Guardians? Look, I'm not one  bit upset with what we ended up getting, because I liked GOTG a whole lot. But speaking from the perspective of BEFORE guardians was green-lit...this should've been there instead. I mean why did they go with such an obscure property over an essential and opportunistic character like Black Panther? Who is actually an Avenger, not to mention he would've added diversity at an earlier time, something Marvel has gotten light criticism for. Overall, I just feel Black Panther is more important.

#2 : 2015's Ant-Man

Normally, I'd be flat out outraged by the fact that freakin Ant-Man is coming before T'Challa, like seriously. But I actually in a sense understand why it is. Ant-Man was a project that was really supposed to be a phase ONE movie. Edgar Wright was working on that as far back as 2006? And Ant-Man (Pym) is an original Avenger...so THAT movie coming before king Wakanda is more reasonable. BUT, that being said...after Edgar Wright left, they really should've pushed the movie to Phase 3, and even before then...they should've postponed it to later plans. Ant-Man was delayed so many times that you could honestly make the case it should've been scrapped. They blew the opportunity for Wasp and Ant-Man in the Avengers long ago. And in this period that they realized Ant-man wasn't gonna release when they wanted to, Black Panther should have got the go-ahead. And this summer 2015 date would've been damn near perfect, last movie in Phase 2 RIGHT before Civil War too. You can't ask for much better than that.


Why do you guys  ultimately think Marvel waited so long to go with a Black Panther movie? There were actually times when it was rumored one was indeed coming in Phase 2. My view personally is that maybe Marvel was hesistant to do a black lead because of the black enpowerment, potential racial concepts (especially if they hire Ava lol) that might be included in a BP film. I don't know that's just how I see it. Anyway, let me know you feel below. 

Do you agree?


 

 

GLADIATOR II Star Denzel Washington Confirms He'll Star In BLACK PANTHER 3 After Ryan Coogler Wrote Him A Role
Related:

GLADIATOR II Star Denzel Washington Confirms He'll Star In BLACK PANTHER 3 After Ryan Coogler Wrote Him A Role

BLACK PANTHER Star Lupita Nyong'o Says Black Doesn’t Sell Myth Had Marvel Shaking In Their Boots
Recommended For You:

BLACK PANTHER Star Lupita Nyong'o Says "Black Doesn’t Sell" Myth Had Marvel "Shaking In Their Boots"

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

DrKinsolving
DrKinsolving - 5/23/2015, 4:56 PM
Yeah, an earlier Black Panther movie would have been cool

But

I like where were at right now in the MCU. AOU opened things up globally and bringing in Black Panther now, in Civil War makes perfect sense.

The Hulkbuster/Hulk fight tore through a city in Africa, and Black Panther isn't going to let that slide. I think the solo Black Panther movie will really dive into the Mythos more, can't wait
Oxbow
Oxbow - 5/23/2015, 5:44 PM
For a long time they were afraid to tackle BP for logistical reasons. The origin story takes place in Africa in a nation tht's super advanced, yada yada yada...I remember them making excuses about why it would be hard to do. And people on the internet said "well, Thor takes place in another realm that's far more technologically advanced than Wakanda, so that's no excuse."

I think they made up for no BP by adding other black actors in the roles of Nick Fury, Falcon and War Machine. But those were all B-characters at best and still, there was no classic heroes of color to speak of in the MCU. And that became glaringly obvious as their Universe continued to expand, to the point where they finally HAD to announce they were doing a BP movie. And then, very shortly after that, they got the rights to Spidey back. And the BP movie got shoved to the back once again. And a great sigh of exasperation went up among the faithful!!

One way they could do it is to introduce BP in Civil War as a fully fledged Avenger, and then go back in time to tell the origin story proper in a Phase 3 BP movie. So far, it seems like the Marvel movies have been happening in "real time" - but I see no reason why they can't do the T'Challa story as one big flashback.
speedyg33
speedyg33 - 5/23/2015, 5:53 PM
@WakandasSoul I think when Marvel wasn't able to secure Spiderman's rights they panicked a bit and put BP in civil war playing a role that was not really his. Then they got Spiderman's rights. It was to late to pull him out. an actor had been cast and revealed. It's not just BP being rushed into Civil War it's everything. Defenders are not complete and no Mrs Marvel.
Oxbow
Oxbow - 5/23/2015, 6:07 PM
We've seen plenty of Spiderman movies but no BP yet so I was hoping as well that they would give Spidey a year or two off and focus on a new character. But I guess they just couldn't help themselves! My guess is that the Marvel Studios chiefs have a soft spot for Spidey and really wanted to shoehorn him in. Either that, or it was part of the deal with Sony that he had to be in a Marvel movie soon. Because there sure as hell isn't any story reason for him to be in a Civil War movie. I don't remember the details anymore but the role that BP was going to play in Civil War sounded much more interesting to me than probably anything they can think up for Spidey.
SnapperCarr
SnapperCarr - 5/23/2015, 10:32 PM
It totally should've taken Antman's spot.
kinghulk
kinghulk - 5/24/2015, 4:19 AM
do you really need to be told why they choose GOTG when their end goal is infinity wars? that aside i would have liked to have seen BP sooner and it's a shame we havent, i think he should have taken ant mans spot.

Archangel82
Archangel82 - 5/25/2015, 6:35 AM
I agree with you that it would have been great to have seen a Black Panther solo movie with an appropriate introduction but I also see what Marvel has planned with his character. Marvel wants to introduce him the same way they introduced the Winter Soldier. I think it makes sense having this stealth like character tracking down Bucky and coming into contact with Cap causing them to have a confrontation. Marvel wants the Panther to be mysterious upon our first viewing by giving us glimpses of the character before we get a full on proper introduction. We've seen this in the comics and the cartoons many times.
Archangel82
Archangel82 - 5/26/2015, 4:58 AM
If Marvel decides to to go with a more mysterious route with the Black Panther in Civil War, I agree with you that they need to do it in a graceful fashion so that the general audience isn't confused as to who he is. Either way I'm super excited that the Panther is finally getting some screen time. I can't help but imagine the fight scenes with him and Cap are going to be epic.
View Recorder