Destroyer 14's Review of Spider-Man: Edge of Time

Destroyer 14's Review of Spider-Man: Edge of Time

You've all been reading some reviews for this game, both positive and negative. Why don't you get the real scoop from a fellow CBMer? Come check out my in-depth review.

Review Opinion
By Destroyer14 - Oct 08, 2011 09:10 AM EST
Filed Under: Fan Fic
Source: My Blog



When Edge of Time was first announced, it looked like an extension, or a direct sequel to last year's Shattered Dimensions. Over the course of the year, we found out that it was going to take the formula, but be a much different game. Shattered Dimensions brought back Spidey 2099 and made him popular again, so of course he would be a major factor in Edge of Time. (In fact, I'd say he's more the main character.) I enjoyed Shattered Dimensions, then again, I've enjoyed all the Spidey games. (Big fan of the character, but you already knew that.) Unlike most, I consider Web of Shadows to be the best one, and has yet to be dethroned.....until now? Let's see.

The plot follows Spidey 2099 hunting down Alchemax scientist Walker Sloan, a man with an idea. He has built a time travel device, and is going back in time to start the company, thus the future being completely owned by Alchemax. Meanwhile, Anti-Venom is back, and strangely wants to eliminate Amazing Spidey. If he dies, everything will go out of whack. Can 2099 stop this, or will the Timestorm consume all of creation?

My major thing with Shattered Dimensions was a lack of plot. There was an opening, and there was an ending. It was basically a popcorn-style plot. Mysterio as the villain was very cliche, considering which he was already the villain in Friend or Foe. With the story being done by high-class comic writer Dan Slott, the plot felt very shallow. Rather than rely on it, it relied on the mechanics of the different Spideys. Edge of Time is complete opposite in that way. Rather than relying on the game's mechanics, it relies on the plot. And that's a good thing.

The majority of fans don't like this game or Shattered Dimensions for not having an open-world, such as the three movie tie-ins have. I think it's disappointing not being able to swing through the streets of New York, but I'm fine with a level-based game. (The old one for the Playstation is highly rated and sometimes regarded as the best Spidey game, yet that wasn't open-world.) Of course, when you have a level-based game, it has to have a good plot to keep up the motivation. That's the one thing Shattered Dimensions failed in, it didn't have an engaging story. (It's still a good game, mind you.) Edge of Time is a really cinematic game, you will not get tired of it. There's actual danger, and you feel it. The CGI animated cutscenes are top notch, with excellent writing and voice acting.

Of course, it's the two Spider-Men that carry us through. They're similar, but a lot of the times clashing personalities, are so much fun to watch. While you may be dying from the onslaught of enemies, their dialogue back and forth will have you smiling the whole way through. I found myself laughing out loud a lot of the times, only Amazing Spidey can make trying to stop the uiniverse from erasing fun. One scene I found myself laughing at (though it's sad for mouse fans) was when a mouse was walking into a room, then the sensors pick it up and disintegrate it with a laser. Spidey 2099 says to this, "Wow, they really mean business." (It doesn't sound hilarious on paper, but on screen it's something else.)

I've been discussing the plot a lot. (Saw what I did there?) Let's talk gameplay. Since this game was done by Beenox, the same people that did Shattered Dimensions, the gameplay remains pretty similar, which is a good thing. Seasoned veterans such as myself can jump in knowing what to do already. The combos are nice, and remains fun. The combat doesn't get repetitive. The upgrade system I find isn't as great as the previous two games. The upgrades aren't as diverse and interesting. Web of Shadows still has the best upgrading system.

Graphic wise, it's very good. The environments have a good amount of detail, (though it could get a bit boring after awhile, you will miss being able to web sling outside) as do the characters. The cinematic cutscenes as I've said, are top notch. (And you unlock them as you go along, so you could enjoy them over and over again.)

The game's sound effects deserve praise, mainly the great voice acting. Here we have all stars Josh Keaton, (Spectacular Spider-Man) as Amazing Spidey, and Christopher Daniel Barnes (The Animated Series) as Spidey 2099. I've always said that hiring familiar voices is the way to do it. The soundtrack is very good, fits the thematic scale. (Shattered Dimensions still has the best soundtrack though.)

A thing I have to mention is the game's biggest weakness: the length. The game arrived in the mail on Thursday, and I beat it the next night. That's right, it took me a day. Web of Shadows took me three, while Shattered Dimensions took me four. For $60, it needs to be longer.

The other characters are portrayed mostly great, with a few exceptions. Mary Jane looks supremely useless, constantly yelling, and running away when 2099 tells her to stay put or come toward him! Web of Shadows did a good job with her character, but this, this is just sad. One of the big selling points, (for me anyway) was the inclusion of Anti-Venom. (The trailer with him in it got me beyond hyped.) With him currently having a role in the comics, it was only natural that they would throw him in. He was in my opinion, the best part of the game. (Voice: EPIC.) The transformation into Atrocity was a bit random, but it greatly adds to the game. (Perhaps a homage to Monster Ock from the Playstation one.) Though, I would have liked a finisher, after you beat the monster, it kinda disappears. I like closure to everything. Now I'm going to address one of the major plot twists of the game, skip to the last paragraph if you don't want to know what it is.

I was genuinely surprised when it was revealed who the CEO of Alchemax was: Peter Parker. Watching him on screen, it just didn't add up at first. The Peter Parker I know would never resort to destroying all of creation. "Playing God" as Spidey 2099 put it. Then after sometime, I began to see the brilliance of the character. He is portrayed as a corrupt Peter would be, with the same humor, albeit serious. Still, I don't think he would resort to erasing everything, but it's still a great portrayal.

Overall, Edge of Time feels like an animated film. The beginning with Anti-Venom is one of the most epic beginning I've ever played. Also in the beginning, with 2099 climbing down a shaft, you could see the names of the makers, it adds to the cinematic feel. This game is better than Shattered Dimensions, (amazing, since they were working on it for only a year) but its length is a bit of a problem. For hardcore Spidey fans such as myself, you'll want to pick it up right after you finish this review. For non-fans, I'd say it'd be best to wait for the price to drop, or give it a rental. You notice how the Timestorm is involved? A reference to the comic event "Timestorm: 2009-2099." There's also a playful jab at Turn off the Dark, it doesn't get any better than that. Edge of Time might just be the best Spidey game to date. Web of Shadows still wins of course.

9/10.
Follow Destroyer_199 on Twitter
DC & Marvel Team Up In Awesome Fan-Created Infinite Crisis Video
Related:

DC & Marvel Team Up In Awesome Fan-Created "Infinite Crisis" Video

Bill Cosby Says He Wants To Be In A Superhero Film
Recommended For You:

Bill Cosby Says He Wants To Be In A Superhero Film

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Moakynubs
Moakynubs - 10/8/2011, 9:35 AM
If you say it needs to be longer... I ask; Did you do all of the challenges?
venkman83
venkman83 - 10/8/2011, 9:43 AM
"For $60, it needs to be longer." that's what she said
manymade1
manymade1 - 10/8/2011, 9:55 AM
OK So I definetly need to get this. Great review, I was a little shaky about getting it because I didn't think it'd be better than SD, but you convinced me.
Cheesehead
Cheesehead - 10/8/2011, 10:26 AM
4.5 out of 10 on IGN.
BooYah
BooYah - 10/8/2011, 10:27 AM
Dang 4.5?!? Yeah, ill just stick with Arkham City.
ThreeBigTacos
ThreeBigTacos - 10/8/2011, 10:39 AM
I'll just rent this on Gamefly, no point in paying 60 bucks for something I'll play for a month or so. I'm also renting Arkham City, not because I don't believe in it, but because I can keep it as long as I want with Gamefly. This way, I don't have to spend $60 bucks, then have it sit on my shelf after a few months.
Destroyer14
Destroyer14 - 10/8/2011, 10:43 AM
IGN doesn't know where it's at.

@Moakynubs I'm talking about the main playthrough.
souhunter
souhunter - 10/8/2011, 10:45 AM
Pass
SHHH
SHHH - 10/8/2011, 10:58 AM
I'll Rent It.... It's Worth 20 25 Dollars...
Destroyer14
Destroyer14 - 10/8/2011, 11:13 AM
@TheGODDAMNSUPERGUY Out of the New 52, I'm only covering Justice League and Detective Comics. They're the only ones I could afford, due to Marvel and IDW's Godzilla.
grifter
grifter - 10/8/2011, 11:27 AM
Sir, I have been playing this game since Tuesday. I enjoy it, I enjoyed this review even better. I hope that Activison will give beenox more time to craft something great in the future. One year development that does not do justice. But I must admit they pulled it off. I say give 'em two years and let then tighten the screws. I believe they can give us something great given time. Good review D14.
Destroyer14
Destroyer14 - 10/8/2011, 11:29 AM
Thanks manymade1 and Grifter.
TrueBlue
TrueBlue - 10/8/2011, 12:33 PM
Good review. But put a spoiler tag on it next time if you're going to reveal a major plot point like the identity of the main villain. I really did not want to know that. As soon as I read that My desire to play went down about 50 percent as soon as I heard that.
Destroyer14
Destroyer14 - 10/8/2011, 12:39 PM
@TrueBlue I said in the paragraph before that the next one would have a major spoiler.
TrueBlue
TrueBlue - 10/8/2011, 12:47 PM
Oh sorry. I missed that. My fault.
LFANCH
LFANCH - 10/8/2011, 1:13 PM
a 4.5 is stupid. ign sucks. it isn't an amazing game but i would say it deserves a 6 at least.
Weeton
Weeton - 10/8/2011, 2:58 PM
@ Destroyer14: I think the main problem with "major plot twist" the sentence before the next paragraph is that it doesn't telegraph effectively how big of a spoiler you're about to critique. In fact, having the spoiler right beneath the photo kind of naturally draws my attention to that paragraph, especially since I was perusing through the article to see how lengthy it was.

I think it'd be helpful to have big bold black letters differentiating the spoiler section just for casual readers.

Good review nonetheless.
bbarber2323
bbarber2323 - 10/8/2011, 3:23 PM
@Trueblue....Jesus, pay attention!!

@Destroyer14...GREAT review. I'm currently playing. I'm STUCK on the second Black Cat fight. Any tips??? If you don't mind emailing me, could you please? [email protected]
nikgrid
nikgrid - 10/8/2011, 3:27 PM
This game was shit, unfortunately Marvel movie success does not translate to games, Iron man was awful IM2 was worse, Thor was garbage and Captain America was ok but only because it shamelessly ripped off Batman Arkham Asylum. I'd say go to Marvel films but avoid the games.
Spider-man 2 was the best, Ultimate spidey 2nd.
BabyGroot
BabyGroot - 10/8/2011, 4:45 PM
Eh wasn't really anticipating for this game anyway. I'm all Arkham City baby! XD By the way... I just watched this video, it'd be a hell of a twist if Arkham City had Batman and Joker in Co-Op. :D

StuckInPanels
StuckInPanels - 10/8/2011, 5:16 PM
I agree, IGN is not the leading game reviewing site. In fact all reviews are subjective, people are going to like good or bad games despite what the "critics" nitpick or praise
Jefferys
Jefferys - 10/8/2011, 7:19 PM
Pffft, IGN, I hate their reviews. What ComicCritic87 said was basically the best way I could say about them. They're more of a news site than anything.

Now I hate I have another five days to wait for this game to even possibly come out here in The Land down under and completely spoiled it to myself and hate myself even more, I am going to cry. BUT, why is this games story so short?
RedDragon2570
RedDragon2570 - 10/8/2011, 10:25 PM
@fsucsu You hit the nail on the head. Being Spider-Man means being free to swing through the city roof tops and dropping in on unsuspecting criminals. These last two games have failed from the start with me because of this. It's like having a superman game, but restricting his flying to a small area. It's just unrealistic and stupid. Bring back sandbox Spidey with a good story and lots of alternate costumes and you got my vote. Stop wasting our excitement on level based wannabe Spidey games. Web of Shadows still wins, even if it had a confusing camera, lacked replay ability, and occasional glitches. It had full sandbox freedom, a good story, lots to do before the ending and good graphics.
ibravosp5
ibravosp5 - 10/9/2011, 5:53 PM
this was a very good review. I just got the game wednesday and I have'nt stopped playing it since. and your right about ign. you know how to make a good review.
Destroyer14
Destroyer14 - 10/9/2011, 6:34 PM
Thank you ibravosp5.
Destroyer14
Destroyer14 - 10/9/2011, 8:14 PM
@fsucsu It's a matter of how one perceives something.
VictorHugo
VictorHugo - 10/10/2011, 5:23 AM
So, Spiderman "pulls a Monica", i mean "pulls a Hulk", as in becoming evil in the future, like HULK becoming MAESTRO in the future and being recruited to stop himself?
View Recorder