McFarlane Sets Straight Wizard of Oz Rumors

McFarlane Sets Straight Wizard of Oz Rumors

Will Dakota Fanning be Dorothy or not? Basically, we don't know much of anything about when this will get off the ground...so be careful what you believe!

By Bamf7 - Sep 01, 2009 09:09 PM EST
Filed Under: Fantasy
Source: Empire

McFarlane himself is setting the record straight at Empire Online that he hadn't even heard the Fanning rumor. "If we just do a sugary sweet Dorothy that everybody has seen over and over for 50 years, as far as I'm concerned, that's too obvious. I'm happy to go with whoever will get the most people in the seats, but sometimes that can change from month to month." As for the status of the project, it might go into production early next year. But McFarlane admits these things can go awry. The script is undergoing a second rewrite, and plot elements like the main character being Dorothy's granddaughter aren't even locked down. Plus, the whole thing might not be as dark as you think. I think my "Twisted" version is a little scary for Warners to embrace. I essentially pitched "Lord of the Rings." It was big, it was bold and it wasn't a very pretty place. It was bad-ass! [...] To get the new audience you're going to have to put some edges on this thing. My version would rock! But they're all like, "We're spending $100m here, we can't go totally nuts, Todd!" So I've told them that the movie I like is the one they're willing to make!"

WICKED: The First Reactions To Jon M. Chu's Musical Adaptation Are In
Related:

WICKED: The First Reactions To Jon M. Chu's Musical Adaptation Are In

WICKED Star Cynthia Erivo Lashes Out At Fan-Edited Posters For Being Degrading, Hurtful, And Wildly Offensive
Recommended For You:

WICKED Star Cynthia Erivo Lashes Out At Fan-Edited Posters For Being Degrading, Hurtful, And Wildly Offensive

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Supermike2
Supermike2 - 9/2/2009, 1:56 AM
hmmmm me scared already seeing big green flying head and flying monkies!!! but one thing me afraid of is LIONS AND TIGERS AND BEARS!!! lol
LadyArkham
LadyArkham - 9/2/2009, 9:29 AM
Nothing personal against Dakota Fanning but, I wouldn't cast her either. The way the story was written was not like the original movie. Don't get me wrong, every girl when they were little loved Dorothy, but that's exactly the point. I think he's right that we don't need another "sugar sweet" version of it. I am interested to see exactly how "twisted" it is.
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 9/2/2009, 9:39 AM
Looking forward to this bring it on!

Plus = TWISTED SOULS & SPAWN 2 or Reboot! ; )
mounted88
mounted88 - 9/2/2009, 11:04 AM
that cant be supermike. the supermike we all know and hate, would not make a joke or anything like that. WTF
MatchesMalone
MatchesMalone - 9/2/2009, 11:08 AM
mounted-Yeah, what the hell? Hopefully it really is him making a concerted effort to shed the psycho/asshole image.
SdProphet
SdProphet - 9/2/2009, 11:13 AM
This supermike imposter is pissing me off...

Damn it's been almost 70 years since te OG film. That's tight wait 72 I think? Lol stoked kinda
superdog
superdog - 9/2/2009, 11:15 AM
hes definitely an imposter. supermike said some stupid stuff but he never said "me scared, me afraid of." he was not that much like bizarro.

tood mcfarlane will fck this up. fckg flavor of the month.
ProfOJ
ProfOJ - 9/2/2009, 11:24 AM
i met todd along time ago,......what a friggin douche.he def loves being him, i would too but..DAMN!!!! PS hes too light hearted & makes too much sense ta b supermike.
Bamf7
Bamf7 - 9/2/2009, 12:13 PM
I agree. If he was Supermike, he would post under Supermike. Not Supermike 2.
texasboy
texasboy - 9/2/2009, 12:43 PM
REMAKES!!!!
cant we do anything new? Maybe we'll remake the remake of Star Trek. Oh wait, remake A New Hope. Vanessa Hudgens could be Leia. GRRRR!!!
legder20
legder20 - 9/2/2009, 2:55 PM
noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo, no remakes, THE WIZAR OF OZ IS PERFECT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Leave it alone!!! Sequles only!!!!!!!!
superdog
superdog - 9/2/2009, 5:29 PM
It won't be a remake. But mcfarland is a douche
GUNSMITH
GUNSMITH - 9/2/2009, 9:43 PM
Y IS IT I DONT EXPECT THIS TO BE A BIG THING OR IT BEING A HUGE FLOP?
PlaidRocker
PlaidRocker - 9/3/2009, 12:25 AM
I actually find it really scary that Hollywood seems to have run out of ideas. I have never seen Hollywood be so remake crazy until now. I can't even begin to name all the damn remakes they've been doing, and most of them are absolutely terrible with only a few exceptions. Fact is, though, that some movies simply don't need to be remade. For example, I VERY much prefer the original Halloween and Day the Earth Stood Still over their remakes. When it comes to the Wizard of Oz though, that's one that really doesn't need to be remade. And if they do, what is this mentality that they have to have edge to it and make it bad-ass? Honestly, when I think Wizard of Oz, I simply don't think bad-ass. The original is so popular and has lasted this long for a reason. Don't fix it if it's not broken.
legder20
legder20 - 9/3/2009, 6:25 AM
Oz has been called hollywoods crown jewl, and plus it is'nt true because disney OWNS all the oz books!!!!!!!!!
Osiris
Osiris - 9/3/2009, 1:22 PM
Actually to all of you who think Oz doesn't need a remake has obviously never read the books, the movie is no where near the source of the books, neither would Mcfarlane's version but that doesn't matter now cause I guess that is what we are getting.

I would love to see a version of Oz that is true to the books source and not all kid friendly kinda like Burton's version of Wonderland. Oz is a pretty twisted tale, it's not all happy frolics down a yellow brick road with singing and dancing, the books are actually pretty creepy. which is why Mcfarlane's version is going to be pretty good, but I doubt that he will pull right from the source he will prob just do his own thing.
Matrix
Matrix - 9/3/2009, 1:32 PM
If they're gonna remake/reboot/rewhatever Oz, it has to be turned right upside down. The original is so classic, no matter how much CGI goes into a new one, the old will always be better. If they do it, it has to be much darker and "twisted", or not at all. I think McFarlane could do something with it, but we'll see I guess.

Or they could just consense HBO's Oz into a 2 hour movie. That'd sure scare the kiddies! :)

http://worldsfunniestvideo.blogspot.com/2006/12/jerry-seinfeld-in-oz.html
View Recorder