Ror Reviews: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1

Ror Reviews: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1

I liked the trailer, but still sort of went to see this under duress. So click for a non reader of the books, non fan of the movies take on this penultimate instalment in the hugely popular Harry Potter series. Some spoilers included..

Review Opinion
By MarkCassidy - Nov 22, 2010 04:11 AM EST
Filed Under: Fantasy
Source: Ror Reviews

I was never a big fan of these movies to be honest. Some I enjoyed, some I didn't, some bored me to tears. I guess its the mishmash of writers/directors. The movies just never gelled for me as a progressive story. I was also never a big fan of the trio of young actors cast in the lead roles, and thought that they were too inconsistent, convincing in some scenes/movies and not others. The last film in the series, The Half Blood Prince, was one of the ones that bored me. I couldn't actually tell you one thing that happened in it of consequence aside from the finale in which Dumbledore(Michael Gambon) is killed. So for that reason, along with the fact that this next movie was directed by the man behind the last one, David Yates, I was fairly sceptical.



This one starts with a bang. After Bill Nighy's opening monologue we know that this is going to be a very dark outing and it gets right into it as Harry and co are attacked by Death Eaters in the stormy night sky. We lose Mad Eye Moody(Brendan Gleeson) and more characters are seriously injured. After this things quiet down considerably and as Harry, Hermione and Ron set off as fugitives from Voldermort's new regime(all very Nazi like) we are into road movie territory; a first for the franchise. This middle section sees the trio journey through forests and mountains, all the while being manipulated by a horcrux(a pendant with malevolent power..yes its all a bit LOTR) and has been criticized for being too slow and dragged out. It is very slowly paced, but I feel it works. The characters are given time to interact on a base level and there are some inspired scenes as jealousy takes over Ron, and Harry and Hermione grow closer. There are some good set pieces along the way too, as they infiltrate The Ministry Of Magic(now under Voldemort's power) in disguise and take on a giant snake. When the final scenes come they do sort of come out of nowhere. After a skirmish with Bellatrix Le Strange(Helena Bonham Carter) and Lucious Malfroy(Jason Isaacs) a "main" character is killed. But as important a role this little fella may have played in the books, in the films he has appeared literally 3 times. Its just not enough to make us feel as sad as Yates clearly wants us to. And for me, didn't work as a dramatic climax, even with the final part still to come. I was also disappointed that my favourite characters like Snape(Alan Rickman), Lupine(David Thewlis) and Bellatrix are reduced to cameos. I realize that with so many characters to juggle that its an inevitability, but I couldn't help but feel a little less time in the tent with Harry and a bit more with the supporting characters would have better served the film.

So, onto the performances. It goes without saying at this point that the likes of Ralph Fiennes, John Hurt, Robbie Coltrane and all of the older actors I have mentioned do a great job, as they always do. What about those damn kids? They really appear to have fully grown into their roles here. For pretty much the first time all 3 convinced me in every scene. I don't know if it was the sharper script, or the cutting back on the sillier attempts at humor but I was pleasantly surprised. Rupert Grint(Ron) has always been used as comic relief and the small amount of humor in this film does go to him to deliver, the difference is, this time its actually funny! Emma Watson(Hermione) has always been the most naturally gifted actor of the 3 imo and does a great job with some pretty heavy scenes. And Daniel Radcliffe shines as The Boy Who Lived, finally delivering the performance he has teased as for so long.

This is by far the best of the series for me. Some will find the pacing off and some scenes don't work as well as others but overall I really enjoyed it. I am officially excited for the final film, and if its lives up to the promise shown in this first part, I may have to rethink my "not a big fan" status.





BETTER MAN: Robbie Williams Is A CGI Ape In First Trailer For Michael Gracey's Bizarre Biopic
Related:

BETTER MAN: Robbie Williams Is A CGI Ape In First Trailer For Michael Gracey's Bizarre Biopic

GLADIATOR II: Epic New Trailer And Poster Tease A New Legacy...Or Another Rebellion!
Recommended For You:

GLADIATOR II: Epic New Trailer And Poster Tease A New Legacy...Or Another Rebellion!

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
Spilox
Spilox - 11/22/2010, 6:05 AM
Dude, isn't ian mckellan playing dumbledore in the halfblood prince?
Spilox
Spilox - 11/22/2010, 6:11 AM
oohw and they infiltrate the ministry of magic, not hogwarts ;). Just trying to point out some confusing facts, not trying to be a dick.

Nice review ror. The whole pendant thing was kinda ripped of from LOTR. And sadly the roles of most baddies are reduced to cameo's. Still a great movie.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 11/22/2010, 6:13 AM
Nah its Definitely Michael Gambon, but thanks for the heads up about The Ministry!
tigz13
tigz13 - 11/22/2010, 6:21 AM
every time Michael Gambon came on screen i couldnt help but imagine him eating other people while listening to ring my bell lol damn book of eli
Shaman
Shaman - 11/22/2010, 6:42 AM
BRILLIANT review, Ror!!! I'm a HUGE fan of ALL the films but i have to agree with you, Half Blood was indeed, the definite worst! I got out of that theater pissed off as all hell at what i had seen!!! Still, it's way better when viewing all of them consecutively. Can't wait to go see this film! Just wanted to let the attendances thin out a bit ;)
BuckyCap
BuckyCap - 11/22/2010, 6:58 AM
This was easily the most boring movie I have ever sat through. It got boo'd when I saw it at the midnight opening. Most of the movie could have been shot by a cluster of trees behind my apartment complex.

I thought the purpose of making two movies was because there was TOO MUCH to put into one movie? This movie has more walking than a Lord of the Rings film and takes about their combined length (or so it feels) to progress the plot the smallest amount. It was a real shame because I liked the books I read when I was younger, and I have enjoyed all the films until this one.
devilscomics
devilscomics - 11/22/2010, 7:15 AM
Dont know why this is here.. Harry aint a comic book character... and thank god..
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 11/22/2010, 7:20 AM
Buckcap, each to his own. Personally I prefered seeing the characters interact under extreme circumstances than having them arse about in that [frick]ing school learning spells from obviously evil dark arts teachers for another movie.

Xenix, well it might have been an extended cameo, but she was only in 2 scenes!
SmokinIndo
SmokinIndo - 11/22/2010, 7:31 AM
Part 2 is going to be so much more exiting than part 1. I had a feeling that people would think this film was boring. The first part of the book was boring as well.

@RorMachine

Don't worry about Snape only having a cameo in this. In Part 2 he is going to play a HUGE part. I cannot stress this enough! His role is going to be MASSIVE!! If the next movie pulls it off just like in the book, then Snape may very well earn a spot on the top 10 greatest movie characters of all time.
golden123
golden123 - 11/22/2010, 7:54 AM
@Rormachine and Shaman: Maybey it's just because I'm a fan of the books and you guys aren't (at least it seems Shaman isn't) but I think the definite worst is the Order of the Phoenix. Phoenix was my 2nd favorite HP book and the movie destroyed it. I thought the half-blood prince movie could of been better nevertheless I thought it did a terrific job.
On the main point of this article I'm going to see part 1 at 7:30 today and I'm immensly excited for it and after hearind a bad review about it being the worst in the seires your review contributed alot to my happiness (I'll laugh at my own comments later). So thanks for the review.
Ryguy88
Ryguy88 - 11/22/2010, 8:02 AM
I've just gotten into this stuff recently; I read the first three then sped things up in anticipation for this movie and watched the last three on DVD. Half-blood was quite boring and some of the others were a little meaningless but the latest was easily the best in terms of scale and as an overall good movie. I'm excited for the next one, the climax of this series should be great!
BuckyCap
BuckyCap - 11/22/2010, 8:12 AM
@Ror Maybe that is why I completely lost interest in the film about 20 minutes in. I liked seeing the world the author created (the school, shops, characters, etc.) and this film was primarily Ron and Hermione in the woods by a tent.

I hope I didn't come off as knocking your review btw. I just didn't like the complete change in formula from previous Harry Potter movies.
CaptainAmerica
CaptainAmerica - 11/22/2010, 8:13 AM
@Buckycap, who boo'd? You? Lol idiot, I'm pretty sure the whole audience didn't boo the film.
smallvillefanricky
smallvillefanricky - 11/22/2010, 9:02 AM
I thought JUST this half was better than the last 2 put together,i absolutly hated the last 2 and was abit unsure about going to see this 1 but i did anywayz as ive grown up with this film since i was 11,im now 19 so i thought since i liked the trailer,which usually they put the good bits in the trailer,it was a spot on half of a film,pitty about the wait till the next half
Shaman
Shaman - 11/22/2010, 9:05 AM
golden123- I'm not a book fan, period. Not that i dislike reading, i just don't have the time for it. Plus i love movies way too much to spend so much time on a book. So from your point of view, i can certainly understand if the book of "Order of the Pheonix" was the best thing since sliced bread, but movie-wise, Half Blood Prince was a freaking joke. At least OOTP felt the same as every other film in the series. The essence that was created for the series was intact in it. But in HBP, everything changed and there was zero development other than when Snape worked on Harry's mind control! And even that scene felt rushed and insignificant. Maybe the film was meant to be this way but it felt like a drastic change of lanes instead of a gradual progressional curb. And Dumbledore's demise certainly wasn't a "wow, what a twist" moment. It was a WTF moment with a sprinkle of GTFO! I don't know who's fault it was, either the writer of the books for having thought of the way the lead-up to that moment was executed or the film's director for not having fleshed out the lead-up correctly, but as a stand alone movie, it reeked and that ending made it reek way harder. Even though i now enjoy the film as a chapter of the series, what i liked about every other film in the series is that even though they were all chapters of one story, the chapters could still stand on their own as stand alone films with their own climax. This was the first time it didn't happen! I mean, what would the "Prisoner of Azkaban" movie have been like if they had ended the film where and if the executionner had chopped Buckbeak's head off? Wouldn't it have lacked a little something there? HPB's whole purpose seemed only to take Dumbledore out of the equation. And to piss me off more, it was the only HP film i had seen in theaters! So i came out of that film feeling like the whole ending to the film was missing, only because it's meant to be linked to the last two. I just couldn't understand why there was a need for that film to be shot in that way and completely switch blueprints when compared to every other chapter before it. Deathly Hallows however, is meant to end that way because it is only part one of the chapter, where i wasn't expecting the HBP to end in the same way.
flash3
flash3 - 11/22/2010, 9:10 AM
@Spilox
He did say Ministry of Magic and not Hogwarts.
Frogman
Frogman - 11/22/2010, 9:46 AM
@BuckyCap I thought you'd read the book? Surely you know they spend a very long time in the forests and camping. The film was pretty damn accurate and by far the best in the series IMHO
YakeTheSnake
YakeTheSnake - 11/22/2010, 9:56 AM
@RorMachine: I dig the review, brother. I will have to disagree(somewhat) about the main character who perishes in the climax of the film. While he appeared more in the books than in the movies; his role was quite important. Without this character, "Chamber of Secrets" wouldn't have had the intense moments that it did. And, in this one, without him, Harry Potter and his friends wouldn't have made it out of the imprisonment alive. Love the review though, sir. BTW, they do, in-fact, infiltrate Hogwarts. But, while it is clearly stated in the book, in the movie you only hear about the bit that Snape is the new Headmaster over the radio.

@BuckyCap: The reason it was split up, is so that it would stick closer to the source material. And this one, while boring, is just setting up the big finale. Oh, it will be fantastic, my good sir.

@Shaman: "Half-Blood Prince" was not the movie(or book) in-which Harry was to be taught Occlumency, that was "Order of the Phoenix." But, yeah, "Half-Blood Prince," both movie and book, had that rushed feeling.
Shaman
Shaman - 11/22/2010, 10:09 AM
Jake Overton- I'm actually exstatic to read you say that! Cause if the book had that half assed feeling too, then the director is not at fault and the DHp1 should definitely be better! So it makes me anticipate this film even more :))
TheNameIsBetty
TheNameIsBetty - 11/22/2010, 11:35 AM
You guys all suck.

After reading all the books, and seeing all the movies so far, I can say that I like every moment of everything.
The only problem I had was the "Goblet of Fire" movie; too different than the book.
@BuckyCap: I think we have a classic case of 'Smallville-hating' syndrome. gtfo
@ Shaman - Jake - Ror: You guys are crazy. Half-Blood Prince was one of my favorites of the books, and the movies.
@CaptainAmerica - Win.
Shaman
Shaman - 11/22/2010, 11:51 AM
Fartman- Then i guess i'll have to say that you suck, back. Cause Goblet of Fire was my absolute favorite film out of the whole series.
JerusalemJr
JerusalemJr - 11/22/2010, 12:27 PM
Fartman - Obviously you have a much more focused and trusted knack on the quality of movie that goes around in the world, I mean just look at your reassuring and educated name..... Maybe what you should realize is that we post our opinions here, and if everyone had the same opinions we would be the borg, mindless and boring. How about a little less judgment and a little more open mind.
TheNameIsBetty
TheNameIsBetty - 11/22/2010, 12:49 PM
@JerusalemJr - In that case, your argument in itself is a contradiction. Since it's totally alright for everybody to have their opinion, and nobody should "judge" as you call it, then technically
nobody should be allowed to post unless they have the same opinion as the article or the first person that posted
SolidSnake007
SolidSnake007 - 11/22/2010, 1:14 PM
I liked the movie very much. It was one of the first to pretty much go chapter for chapter with the book. I would have liked it if they involved the order a bit more and expanded on Harry/Ginny. One thing they didn't mention and I was both surprised and kinda hurt was the fact that Harry becomes Godfather to Lupin and Tonk's child. We also should have seen more of the battle between the Order and the Death Eaters. But Overall it was one of the better Harry movies and I can't wait to see the final Battle of Hogwarts.
emilyella
emilyella - 11/22/2010, 1:20 PM
wtf michael gambon doesnt even look like ian mckellen
thebamf
thebamf - 11/22/2010, 2:11 PM
I liked the movie, but it did have a sort of LOR feel to it. Overall, it was good but it did drag a little. The next one will be epic. Alot more action!
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 11/22/2010, 3:35 PM
Landsdowne, she was in the opening scene at the table with Voldemort, and the final battle scene. Yes they cut away and went back to her but its still just one scene.
WolvieCBM
WolvieCBM - 11/22/2010, 4:33 PM
The thing that bothers me the most in this movie is the lack of Voldemort. In the trailers he is in almost every scene, yet in the film he is in like two, maybe three scenes.

@Ror: Now that you've seen it, have you noticed that the trailer for this film has almost every scene from Part 2?
capthejedi
capthejedi - 11/22/2010, 5:36 PM
The worst thing about HBP was skipping over the important memories in the pensive(other suspected horucruxes) as well as the infiltration of hogwarts and the ensuing battel. I miss those things because they set up Deathly hallows and are esential but Deathly hallows did help cover the missing links about as well as one could expect. All in all Deathly Hallows PT.1 is the best harry potter to date.
jshark
jshark - 11/22/2010, 6:24 PM
1. Epic Win
2. Win Win
3. Fail
4. Fail/Win
5. Win.
6. Win Win
7 Part 1. Epic Win

That's my take on the films so far. I use the books and my like/dislike for the movies in my analysis. The change of directors for Prisoner of Azkaban jscked that movie up IMO. I can deal with the change in Dumbledore, it's a shame it had to change, but ce la vie. I recommend reading the final book to fully understand how they did Part 1. It makes more sense that way, especially if you go into the movie knowing it's a complete set-up rather than a stand alone movie. I found it to be the best behind The Sorceror's Stone, maybe even better. The liberties taken in films 3-6 made it necessary to back track and do the story of Part 1 as they did. So many things are inter-connected that the directors F'd things up royally. I can't believe Rowling allowed them to do that to her storys. I can understand with CBMs creating new story arcs and changing things because there are so many to choose from, but for books, comics, anime that have singular story arcs changing things are an insult to fans and moviegoers alike. If Part 2 happens like many of us hope, it may just be one of the most epic movie experiences of all time. I say that against Captain, Lantern, and Thor too because the previews of HP gave me that 'goosbumps' effect, the others have not.
Jimdlux
Jimdlux - 11/22/2010, 7:01 PM
Totally boring movie...I fell asleep...
skank
skank - 11/22/2010, 7:01 PM
Not saying it wasn't okay, but it was just that. Just want to know what Hollywood would have done with it instead of the Brits (hey--I am a Brit!). I've been wondering that for a while now. I hope Hollywood redoes the series with their own set of sensibilities.
Ryguy88
Ryguy88 - 11/22/2010, 9:44 PM
Jshark, Azkaban received the best reviews of all the HP movies and it was directed by Alfonso Cuaron, one of the best directors currently making movies. And the reason the last bunch of movies strayed from the books is because the source material in the first 2 is so much more simplistic and thus, easier to translate into a single movie.
YakeTheSnake
YakeTheSnake - 11/23/2010, 5:37 AM
@SolidSnake007: They would of had difficulty expanding on Harry/Ginny. At the end of HBP(book, they split, so that she wouldn't be in anymore harm than she already would have been. But in the film, the neglected to mention this, making it hard to expand on their relationship. And, with the Godfather deal, that shouldn't have ever even been mentioned in the book. It would have been important if Harry actually raised the kid, but he didn't. After Lupin and Tonk's death, he was raised by Tonk's mother. I never understood why that was mentioned in the books.

@capthejedi: I thought the same thing about HBP(about the battle after Dumbledore's death). But, I read in an interview, J.K. Rowling agreed with Yates to remove that from the film, feeling that it would decrease the importance of the final battle in the last book. So, after reading that, I was ok with it.
YakeTheSnake
YakeTheSnake - 11/23/2010, 5:40 AM
One thing I failed to mention i my review, that pissed me off: In the books, all of the characters are further frightened by the fact that Voldemort can fly without the aid of a broom/Thestral/etc. But, starting in OOTP(movie), all the Death Eaters seem to be able to fly. It was supposed to be terrifying that Voldemort was so powerful, that he could fly. They dropped the ball on that one.
YakeTheSnake
YakeTheSnake - 11/23/2010, 5:54 AM
Oh yeah, nobody has mentioned this yet: How awesome was the animated short for the "Tale of the Three Brothers"?????
Stumblin
Stumblin - 11/23/2010, 7:29 AM
Jake, I loved the animated short, wonderful styling!

I'm not huge into Harry Potter movies, I always felt I could figure out the entire movie before it was even half way through. This one was definitely the top of the list as the best movie out of all of them. I really enjoyed it, though it did feel a bit dragged out, and it seems to still follow the same formula as the others. Is it me or does Ron seem to flip his bitch switch in every movie?
1 2
View Recorder