28 YEARS LATER Ending Explained By Movie's Writer; New Details On Upcoming Sequel And Threequel - SPOILERS

28 YEARS LATER Ending Explained By Movie's Writer; New Details On Upcoming Sequel And Threequel - SPOILERS

Filmmakers Danny Boyle and Alex Garland break down 28 Years Later's twisted conclusion, what it means for the planned sequels, and how much of Cillian Murphy's Jim we'll see in the rest of the trilogy.

By JoshWilding - Jun 20, 2025 11:06 AM EST
Filed Under: Horror
Source: Variety (via Fear HQ)

28 Years Later ends with the introduction of Jack O'Connell's Jimmy Crystal, a cult leader who looks set to bring Alfie Williams' Spike under his wing (you can read a full breakdown of how things play out here).

We meet Jimmy as a boy in the movie's opening scene, and the implication seems to be that he'll be a key figure in this new trilogy. While it's too soon to say what that will look like, many fans are already theorising that it will be down to Cillian Murphy's Jim to stop his apparent killing spree.

The Marvels director Nia DaCosta helmed the already-shot middle chapter, 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple. Talking to Variety (via FearHQ.com) about 28 Days Later star Murphy's role in the series, filmmaker Danny Boyle confirmed that Jimmy will be a key figure in DaCosta's follow-up.

"He’s an executive producer on this and was enormously supportive. He appears briefly in Nia’s film," the director confirmed. "I don’t think that’s giving too much away, and our plan is that he will be an enormous character in the third film in the way that Jack O’Connell’s character — who you see briefly at the end of the first film — is an enormous character with Ralph Fiennes in the next film."

Asked what inspired Jimmy, writer Alex Garland told the trade, "What he is from is the same thing that the entire film is from in a way, which is this film — and in a way the whole trilogy, if we ever get to make it as a trilogy — is in part about how we look in a regressive way to the past."

"Very simply, Danny and I grew up in an era where everything was about looking forward in some respects, and currently, for the last 10 or 15 years, we’re in an era that is very much about looking back. What the film is preoccupied with on some level is the way when we look back, there is amnesia, and there is cherry picking. Also, there are things that are misremembered."

"What the film is, if you look at individual characters, but you also look at the community that’s represented and the elements about the communication and the world-building is a mash of those things: Things that have been forgotten, things that have been cherry-picked and things have been misremembered. They’re smushed so together, which carries within it a kind of commentary," he concluded.

It sounds like Jimmy might be a warped version of what he remembers of the past before the Rage Virus ravaged the UK. That promises to make him a fascinating character, and one DaCosta clearly has big plans for in her sequel (more Ralph Fiennes also isn't a bad thing). 

Beyond that, Garland is less certain about the yet-to-be-confirmed third instalment. "The script isn’t written," he confirmed. "It’s strange: There’s a story, there’s a plan, there’s a structure. These three films are in some ways distinct from each other, in other ways interrelated, because there are characters that have a through line throughout all of them, although they are also essentially separate stories."

"I think that, having written the first one, in many ways I didn’t know at that point what the film would be, because there’s a whole set of discoveries left to uncover. The same is also true with the second film," Garland explained. "So I had to understand something about what Ralph Fiennes is going to create with Danny, to be able to lean to that. So short answer: I’ve got the idea, I’ve got the plan, but there’s not a script."

While it's hard to imagine Sony Pictures not moving forward with Boyle and Garland's threequel, it happening likely hinges on the box office success of both 28 Years Later and 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple.

However, the former is one of the studio's best-reviewed titles in some time, with 92%. That and the promise of Murphy playing a lead role in the threequel are bound to go in its favour.

In 28 Years Later, it's been almost three decades since the rage virus escaped a biological weapons laboratory, and now, still in a ruthlessly enforced quarantine, some have found ways to exist amidst the infected. One such group of survivors lives on a small island connected to the mainland by a single, heavily-defended causeway.

When one of the group leaves the island on a mission into the dark heart of the mainland, he discovers secrets, wonders, and horrors that have mutated not only the infected but other survivors as well.

28 Years Later arrives in theaters on June 20, 2025

28 YEARS LATER Spoilers: Does Tonally Jarring, Batsh*t Ending Derail The Entire Movie?
Related:

28 YEARS LATER Spoilers: Does Tonally Jarring, "Batsh*t" Ending Derail The Entire Movie?

28 YEARS LATER Ending Explained: Does Cillian Murphy Appear And Is There A Post-Credits Scene? - SPOILERS
Recommended For You:

28 YEARS LATER Ending Explained: Does Cillian Murphy Appear And Is There A Post-Credits Scene? - SPOILERS

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Antitrollpatrol
Antitrollpatrol - 6/20/2025, 11:48 AM
28 years later: Jim vs Jimmy

Or

28 years later: Battle of the Jimmies
Malatrova15
Malatrova15 - 6/20/2025, 11:50 AM
@Antitrollpatrol - His name was Jimmie Rustle
kylo0607
kylo0607 - 6/20/2025, 11:51 AM
The ending of this film almost completely ruins the whole thing.

It felt like watching a parody of a zombie film - Shaun of the Dead.

Can't believe that scene is set in the same universe where 28 Days and Weeks take place. And we're jumping from THIS scene next January into a sequel directed by The Marvels' director?

Yeah, this franchise is going to the ground.
NHartMusic
NHartMusic - 6/20/2025, 12:30 PM
@kylo0607 - nah it was classic Danny Boyle. Felt very inline with Trainspotting or Millions. a bit out of left field perhaps, but certainly did not ruin the rest of the movie for me.
Humperdink
Humperdink - 6/20/2025, 12:46 PM
@kylo0607 - It reminded me of how they depict Power Rangers when they flip and fight. It was so bizzare and such an uneven shift in tone.
SuperCat
SuperCat - 6/20/2025, 12:03 PM
User Comment Image
AllsGood
AllsGood - 6/20/2025, 12:11 PM
The Rotten Tomatoes Audience Score has been Reveled So Far

69% Popcornmeter

500+ Verified Ratings
HashTagSwagg
HashTagSwagg - 6/20/2025, 12:16 PM
It was hit and miss, if you've seen the trailers and TV spots, you've literally seen 98% of the infected action.
The editing was the worst aspect, they do that cutaway trope so many times where it looks like our hero's are screwed, only for them to cutaway and suddendly the infected are miles behind from where they were just seconds ago. Ain't seen the trope abused that bad since Game of Thrones long night episode.
AllsGood
AllsGood - 6/20/2025, 12:40 PM
@HashTagSwagg - Sounds like Zombie Drama.
JacobsLadder
JacobsLadder - 6/20/2025, 2:52 PM
@HashTagSwagg - it's terrible. The way the father gets sidelined mid-movie. Like he wouldn't have went immediately after them and tracked them down in two hours. The insertion of the troops was just bizarre. I would've respected it more if the soldiers were there on some Jurassic Park-style mission, but nope: they just washed up from a hitting a rock in full tactical gear armed to the teeth. The fact the entire world is like today and Britain has been isolated and quarantined for decades is so [frick]ing stupid it drives me crazy. Two infected procreating a healthy human? Stop it. If she was already pregnant and then go infected, how? She's wearing a hospital gown. what hospitals?
And hey kid, here's your mom's head, go stick it up on that totem pole. The movie was off the rails long before the final 10 minutes.
It's all Spike and his father can do to get back home but a boy with a newborn baby travels even further with no problem? The script is atrocious.
KingZero
KingZero - 6/20/2025, 1:03 PM
I enjoyed it. Genuinely surprised by the ending, which is rare (the mad zealot in Sunshine did the same to me too). I left the cinema laughing which is not what I expected to be doing. I guess it makes sense. You look at some groups of people in society and laugh sometimes. But my god, it was like Big Train crashed into 28 days later. [frick]ing fantastic. Especially considering how heavy it was in the first act, with it's heavy handed commentary and intercut footage, and the soundtrack. Then into a Ken Loach apocalypse horror and then finally... Wow. [frick]ing love Danny Boyle and Alex Garland together.

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder