The Thing 2011 review *Spoiler Warning!!*

The Thing 2011 review    *Spoiler Warning!!*

We all fear someTHING, and for most of us that is that THE THING 2011 will be the death nail in an otherwise profitable franchise. Is it? Read on to find out.

Review Opinion
By BJD - Oct 16, 2011 02:10 PM EST
Filed Under: Horror




I did go see this movie drunk with my buddy opening night….he told me that I enjoyed myself so much that I was louder than the group of black girls behind us. So Saturday morning I took some advil, drank some soda, and went to the morning matinee.


THE THING 2011 is recounts the events that happened at the Norwegian compound right before John Carpenter’s movie in 1982. The movie starts off with three Norwegians in a snow cat trying to home in on the source of a mysterious radio signal…..a little reminiscent of Alien if you ask me. They find an alien spacecraft and an alien, and now have to call in the most attractive paleontologist they can find ( Mary Elizabeth Winstead….Kate Lloyd) to dig it safely out of the ice. They succeed in both, they get the thing back to the compound, it thaws out, and all kinds of gory clichés and plagiarism ensue.

Now that may have sounded cynical but I definitely think the movie is worth seeing. I hear a lot people saying that this movie lacked on real scares and relied more on gore. Well there was definitely more than a few times that I was genuinely jolted….not to be mistaken with disgusted. Yeah sure they were all cheap scares and not substantive terror but I really don’t even know if that’s possible in a movie anymore. The movie had some minor inventiveness, especially when it came to figuring out who was human and who wasn’t, and I appreciated that. But it also shamelessly tore from the pages of other sci-fi/horror movies such as ALIENS and a slew of David Cronenberg films. Mary Elizabeth Winstead gave a so-so performance as the Ellen Ripley like strong female lead and that pretty much can be said for everybody else in the movie except for Jørgen Langhelle who played Lars, the one character in the movie who couldn’t speak any english. I had a soft spot for him while I watched this movie, especially when he had a very vulnerable moment showing Kate Lloyd where the grenades were hidden. You get to see some more of the inside of the alien craft although nothing really interesting except for some holographic legos. The climax of the movie makes you scratch your head saying if the alien could do that now, why didn’t it just do that when it crashed. After that, it ends on a flat note and leaves you wondering what happens to Kate Lloyd….perhaps another movie, bring it on!
Since I didn’t see this movie drunk and remember it I can’t use the empty bottle rating system but I can say that I give it a traditional B-.
CROSSED: Movie Adaptation Of The Most Disturbing Comic Of All Time In The Works
Related:

CROSSED: Movie Adaptation Of "The Most Disturbing Comic Of All Time" In The Works

THE SUBSTANCE: Demi Moore And Margaret Qualley Fight For Control Of The Same Body In Bloody New Trailer
Recommended For You:

THE SUBSTANCE: Demi Moore And Margaret Qualley Fight For Control Of The Same Body In Bloody New Trailer

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

ballstothewall
ballstothewall - 10/17/2011, 12:40 PM
I think i borrows too much from the John Carpenter version.
BJD
BJD - 10/17/2011, 1:16 PM
@ballstothewall- you're right, in fact I think it literally does at the end of the movie. I'm reasonably certain the last scene is footage from the original movie. But I still think the movie was absorbing enough to enjoy.
EarOne
EarOne - 11/28/2011, 10:32 PM
well...BALLS...it IS a PREQUEL. you DO know what a prequel is, don'tcha..??

thus, most of the scenes in this movie LEAD to the john carpenter's movie, which is why, when you watch this movie back-to-back with that movie..it'll add to your appreciation for it.

sure, the inside of the craft is nothing original or impressive, but i don't think that's the point of this movie. like the john carpenter's movie, this one also goes for the claustrophobic dread created by the "thing". it's not as much as a whodunnit as the 1982 movie, but, it's decent enough as its "prequel".

and yeah...gotta say that MEW isn't quite up to the task to anchor this movie. i think joel edgerton would've done a better job at it, much like Kurt Russell did with the 82 movie. i think they should've gone with a much more talented and charismatic actress.

bottom line though, after you done watching this, you'll appreciate the PRE-CGI john carpenter movie even MORE. the stuff they did back then withOUT computers...it's just WOOOWWW...!!! Too bad that movie didn't do as well in 82.

but this The Thing, i think, has done the job it's set out to do and i'm looking forward to see SEQUELS now and moving forward..either continuing the MEW's storyline, Kurt Russell's MacReady character's storyline, or start from scratch..bring it on.
View Recorder