New Technology in Theaters to Fight Film Piracy?

New Technology in Theaters to Fight Film Piracy?

With the film industry losing billions each year due to film piracy, a new technology will soon be implemented.

By Whispers68 - Sep 23, 2009 10:09 AM EST
Filed Under: Other
Source: Worst Previews

According to MPAA, there's an estimated 2.5 million American jobs that rely on the film industry and with a reported $3 billion of damages sustained each year due to film piracy, the industry can no longer rely on old methods.

The industry used to feel the best method at handling bootleggers would be one method used last year during The Dark Knight's theatrical release...having ushers roam the theater with night vision goggles, searching for anyone with a recording device. You could even make the assumption some theaters potentially rely on the average movie patron to report piracy discovered while in the theater.

The industry has decided on a different approach. With the help of Japan's National Institute of Informatics, Sharp has devised a technology that practically renders a recording device useless when trying to record a movie during its theatrical release. The technology involves a flashing pulse of infra-red light being emitted from behind the screen. The pulses would pass through the tiny holes of the screen and cause a rather nasty interference for all recording devices.

Although apparently invisible to the human eye, in thinking you can get through the loop holes somehow by still deciding to record a theatrical film, in trying to filter out the interference, the system is set up where you'll fail regardless what attempts are made. If you try to blur out the interference, it'll further destroy the little amount of the film that you have on your recording device.

If this technology is as successful as the industry is expecting, the bootlegging industry will b crippled but as time progresses with all forms of bootlegging, someone down the line will devise a method at leveling the playing field.

Below is an example of two images...on the left is an image without interference and the one to the right would be the image with the Infra-red interference

LORD OF THE RINGS Filmmaker Sir Peter Jackson On Teaming With Colossal To Resurrect The Giant Moa (Exclusive)
Related:

LORD OF THE RINGS Filmmaker Sir Peter Jackson On Teaming With Colossal To Resurrect The Giant Moa (Exclusive)

EYES OF WAKANDA Teaser Trailer Takes Us Back To The Jaw-Dropping World Of BLACK PANTHER
Recommended For You:

EYES OF WAKANDA Teaser Trailer Takes Us Back To The Jaw-Dropping World Of BLACK PANTHER

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

LEEE777
LEEE777 - 9/23/2009, 10:11 AM
Ahhhh there's nothing wrong wiv piracy lol, HOLLYWOODS ripping us all off!!! : D

You think i would've payed to see that crap DRAGON BALLZ!

Lmao! ; D

LEEE777
LEEE777 - 9/23/2009, 10:13 AM
Of course everything else ive seen this year ive watched at the cinema or bought the Blu-ray!!

Cept i aint buying BORIGINS! : D

Heck its not even worth a download lol.
thwhtGuardian
thwhtGuardian - 9/23/2009, 10:13 AM
If that's the only interference there will be I don't see pirating going down.
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 9/23/2009, 10:14 AM
AXXO aint gonna be happy lol!
Whispers68
Whispers68 - 9/23/2009, 10:22 AM
LOL @ Lee.

What they fail to report (Hollywood) is the tendency of viewers to not only go out and watch the film in theaters after viewing the pirated version, but also purchasing the DVD/Blu-ray once it's released.

That comment about AXXO was rather funny. LOL

@thewhtknight, we've all been a viewer of some form of pirated material but if I ever came across a movie with dotted lines throughout it, I would have to pass. I'll assume the dotted lines will be more spread out on the particular scene
Wadey09
Wadey09 - 9/23/2009, 10:39 AM
i agree with thwhtknight.
this might simply annoy bootleggers but it wont stop them.
unless the images shown were the tutorials and the actual infrared beam is much more powerful.
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 9/23/2009, 10:43 AM
WHISPERS @ Heh heh! ; D

And your right!


TEA @ lol!

Damn i only watched a pirate last night ANACONDA 3 (With THE HOFF)

That was pure sh!tE lol! Hey HOFF was the only good thing in it!!

Heh heh, yoking! : D
Whispers68
Whispers68 - 9/23/2009, 10:57 AM
I can't imagine how the individuals felt that helped generate $9,362,785 domestically for Dragon ball:Evolution and everyone who helped pushed for the foreign total of $48,134,914.

I wanted to literally vomit with every scene in that movie. It's a period of my life that I could never get back and as expected, the film was severely horrible.

Most of the people i know either downloaded the film or didn't watch it so if Hollywood truly wants to stop piracy, here's something they can truly do

Stop giving access to material to any and everyone (that's for DVD screener/work-print releases that somehow find their way online.

As for bootleggers, well...National Association of Theatre Owners has over 29,000 theater screens in the US alone and that's one organization. Can you imagine all 29,000 screens being so monitored it would hinder a bootlegger from copying a movie?

I think not. They will exist forever, similar to prostitution. This new technology may be a burden in the beginning but eventually, someone will crack the code
thwhtGuardian
thwhtGuardian - 9/23/2009, 11:12 AM
I don't know, I think they'd actually have to obscure the whole picture for it to be effective, I mean anyone who watches pirated films online is already used to the poor quality of these movies so I don't see this adding much more. I mean if it was a boot leg dvd I was buying I'd be pissed, but that's not the main method of business any more, it's more about downloads and streaming videos now, so if its free no one's going to really care about the poor quality.
CaptainAmerica
CaptainAmerica - 9/23/2009, 12:56 PM
I hope it works, people who watch movies illegally are idiots.
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 9/23/2009, 12:57 PM
TEA @ You've seen it lol!!! : D
supermarioworldE
supermarioworldE - 9/23/2009, 1:37 PM
Hollywood screws us over every year with terrible movies. Downloading them is our retaliation. If a movie is good enough, I will see it in theaters and never download it, to show some respect to those few films that deserve my money. Hollywood is flawed. I hoped that piracy would encourage Hollywood to make better movies, but we continue to get movies like Dragon Ball and X-men 3. You want my money Hollywood? You're gonna have to work for it.


FIGHT THE POWER!
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 9/23/2009, 2:27 PM
FIGHT THE POWER!!!

Wadey09
Wadey09 - 9/23/2009, 2:27 PM
@ supermarioworldE

everyone knows that hollywood is flawed. the academy awards proved that. but how do you get the attention of a flawed system? right now, bootleggers are shown as the evil doers compared to hollywood. know why?
because bootleggers are actually breaking the law.
our justice system is likewise screwed up. but i don't see anyone actually illegally opposing it within the past couple of years. and if they do something illegal, the opposition is silenced.

i personally like the idea of these ir pulses because how do you really know if a movie is good unless you actually see it?
everyone has a different opinion. two may agree on one thing and disagree on another. and deciding not to give a movie a chance despite what friends or the press says is not only disrespecting the crew of the film who worked the butts off, but to the simple idea that someone can escape their life for two hours and live someone elses.
i think there are bad movies out there but i beleive people should experience them for themselves.
otherwise someone could start sounding like their own parents. ironic right?
thwhtGuardian
thwhtGuardian - 9/23/2009, 2:29 PM
personally, I never download movie, I just find places that stream them illegally.
Whispers68
Whispers68 - 9/23/2009, 2:42 PM
Everyone has a valid point here because on one hand, saying a film will suck before checking it out can be premature...but on the other hand, how many people actually said "Batman & Robin" would be good? Who actually watched the trailer of "The Spirit" and said "this movie is going to be an exceptionally developed comic book adapted movie?" How many people saw the trailer for "Dragon Ball Evolution" and made the overall conclusion that the film would be good...in fact, not even good but mediocre?

Chances are, the judgment you make about a film that results in not checking it out in theaters has a greater chance of being exactly as how you perceived it would...meaning, if you watch the trailer and say, "ok, this movie sucks and won't get my $13," you're more than likely correct on the assumption. There are films that don't fit this idea though but generally speaking, not checking out a movie in theaters due to your initial opinion usually benefits you in the end.

How many of us chose to "Download illegally" or stream TDK as opposed to going to IMAX or a regular theater? I can bet less than one percent. The reason being, you saw the trailer and thought, "this is definitely worth my hard earned dollars."

When something is worth the dollars you worked for in your opinion, you won't be overwhelmed with the idea of not wanting to spend on it.

I don't condone or oppose illegal distribution of movies, but for every individual who speaks against it, there's ten more with valid reasons as to why they do it.
satanors
satanors - 9/23/2009, 3:47 PM
Checking piracy will actually kill the movie industry.
I would not be in a mood to watch any more movies for sometime if the last 2 i watch in a theater were bad. But if i like a movie that i watc*cough*d on*cough*ine, i definitely will see it in a theater.
Pirates of the caribbean = 3 times in a theater.
transformers= 2 times (what? i liked it)
Spiderman 3= 1 (i watch it online in french, i think ..speederman and maarie jane?? )
Matrix = 14 times (Bring it to the theaters again)

Piracy protects us from bad movies like the current james bond and harry potter movies. This way, your day will not be totally ruined and you do not have to curse anyone.
InstigatorGIRL
InstigatorGIRL - 9/23/2009, 5:08 PM
I agree if I watch a movie thats pirated and it was good. It makes me want to see it in thetres. Example Inglorious Basterds. I loved it and went to see it in theatres. Also the Ugly Truth I thought it was funny so I went to watch it in theatres twice.
Hollywood come out with good movies and quit screwwing us with craptastic flicks and you won't have to worry about getting screwed yourself.
Duhdaduh
Duhdaduh - 9/23/2009, 7:46 PM
i cant get my mind around this whole concept of downloading and watching crappy quality bootlegs. i dont care how bad i think the movie is gonna be, i'll watch like normal or not at all. the fuzziness, rocky camera, hard to see spots, and just being able to see the theatre ruins it for me. and i would never be able to see a whole movie sitting in front of my computer. how lazy and cheap can a person be??

wow, i just read over what i wrote and realized im bitching about this...

;)
TheGuillotine
TheGuillotine - 9/23/2009, 8:24 PM
That's the same tech that the billionaire russian had installed on his new boat. So when a paparazzi tries to shoot a picture of people on the boat an infrared laser is emitted that destroys the camera's lens from the inside. Pretty cool stuff.
Whispers68
Whispers68 - 9/23/2009, 8:35 PM
LoL@ duhdaduh

I don't view it as cheap though. If something is worth it, you'll spend the necessary funds for it. For example if my girlfriend and I are browsing the LV store and she really wants a particular bag, I'll surprise her with it. The joy it brings her, the quality of the fabric, etc makes the purchase worth it. Yes you can get a $30 knockoff but the regular price was worth it. Now if th regular price wasn't worth it, I wouldn't get it.

So it's mainly about the overall satisfaction you get. If I sat in a theater watching Dragon Ball Evolution, I wouldve been sick to my stomach knowing I spent $13 on such a horrible experience. you can instead sit comfortably at home and stream a dvd screener of the film to your PS3/Xbox 360 and watch it on your LCD/Plasma.

If it sucks...well, all you wasted was time and not both money and time
supermarioworldE
supermarioworldE - 9/23/2009, 8:41 PM
@duhdaduh, don't worry, everybody bitches on this site at some point. You should see my rants about rob zombie!

@Wadey, I don't mean any disrespect to the people who work on films, but if they insult my intelligence with terrible movies that are glossed up to look pretty in trailers, I feel disrespected. Directors, Writers, Cast and Crew, all know of the crap they push in front of us because they work on them. Just like Dragon ball. The story is unforgivably far away from the source material and they know it, but they still try to shove it onto our shoulders, because at the end of the day, it's all about the money. And the same goes for me. If they are not willing to push for my money, then i am not willing to pay them.

@LEE, Where do they sell that gum! lol!
defunny
defunny - 9/23/2009, 8:45 PM
Someone is going to sue when the first kid has a seizure, foams at the mouth, and flops around on the floor watching Transformers 3. Then again, maybe Megan Fox's acting makes people do that...
dukemeiser
dukemeiser - 9/23/2009, 9:16 PM
$3 billion loss starts with a false premise. The start with the notion that everyone who downloads a bootleg copy would have BOUGHT a copy without the optional bootleg. This is not true. Most people that go through all the trouble of downloading and watching a bootleg movie would never have bought the movie in the first place. Or have went to the theatre.
Wadey09
Wadey09 - 9/23/2009, 11:49 PM
@supermarioworldE
i understand your point of view and agree with most of your points. but think about this:
remeber all the crap that came up about mudflap and skids in ROTF? about how they were considered racist stereotypes? writers ortzi and kurtzman claimed that they had no idea how bay or the guys working the cg would pull off those characters.
when actors film a movie, when designers build a set, or make a costume, they only know half of the picture. so when they see the premiere, they are finally watching the director's vision come to life.
sometimes, that vision isn't what the people wanted. which is why dragonball got poor box office results.
hopefully in a sequel, the director will broaden his vision past corny kid flick into an epic galaxy wide story on film.
if the movie doesn't appeal to you, don't watch it in theatres. but dont endorse bootlegging either.
wait for it to come out on dvd/blu ray and borrow it from a friend who rented or bought it.
instead of doing something illegal, all you have to do is wait about five months.
by then you should know what to expect in the movie and form an opinion then.


i honestly think the wolverine leak nearly killed it's box office. that means those that were working on commission are getting paid extremely less than they should have.
the crews/actors/producers/directors on films do not mean anyone disrespect. they are trying to accomplish the opposite. some go about it the wrong way.
but i beleive under no circumstance should a citizen resort to piracy just so that they can save 5-13 dollars.
WeaponX
WeaponX - 9/24/2009, 2:34 AM
What's with all the self righteousness? As if you've never broken a law. I don't video record movies in theaters nor would I ever, but I watch films I'm not certain about online and if I like the film, I'll grab a group and go see it in a theater. If it's a piece of shit, then I'm glad I didn't throw down hard earned cash for it. Just like I wouldn't buy a car without test driving it first. If you make a shit product then complain that no one is buying it after sampling that product, well boo-hoo, make a better product. $3 billion is an industry statistic, not hard fact. Statistics are most always inflated to give support to a particular groups argument. Government and other social organizations have been doing it for decades.

Prices for theater tickets and DVDs are already inflated to cover there asses if the film does poorly regardless. It's just bitching about squeezing every available penny from the consumer that drives this campaign. People in the industry that work behind the scenes get paid regardless of the films success.

This is an interesting technology, but it won't stop piracy. I think people would be less inclined to watch a pirated movie online if they weren't lured in by false advertising on the film industry's part. I'm talking about movie trailers that make you believe that going to see their movie will give you this big thrill ride of an experience and if you walk in and sit through 2 hours of utter crap, than tough shit for us because we fell for the sales pitch. With most restaurants, when you get a menu the dishes are describe in a way to make you think that the dish is delicious. If you order a dish believing that you will experience what the description advertises and honestly aren't satisfied, you don't pay for it or are at least compensated in another matter. When you buy most products from stores there are compensations in place if you're not satisfied. The film industry doesn't do that.

If you were allowed to be refunded or compensated in some form by the film industry because you were hoodwinked into paying to see their crappy product, I think a hell of a lot of people wouldn't bother downloading this stuff online. I think there are a lot of decent people out there who are on budgets and can't afford to toss money down the toilet and if previewing a sub-par quality film online to see if its worth the full theater experience is a part of their wise spending plan, then so be it. Because like I said, as far as I know, the film industry has absolutely nothing in the ways of costumer compensation. Damn near every other major business has something from refund to company credit but not the fat cats in the film industry. So, they can take their violins and piss off with it. They are just annoyed that they aren't lining their pockets at the maximum. The "little people" in the industry are paid for their work and its' most likely just an angle to get you to sympathize with the massive corporate money machine that is the film industry. If the product is worth it, I'll pay for it at price - like a lot of people would. If it isn't tough shit because viewing online is a good way thus far to protect yourself from getting ripped off.
Whispers68
Whispers68 - 9/24/2009, 6:07 AM
@ weaponX

that was said rather beautifully...seriously. As I've said before, my position isn't about condoning or shunning piracy but what you explained above was downright exactly how millions of other individuals believe


I appreciate the comment

@dukemeiser
That's truly correct. I don't feel the $3 billion is accurate as well because they're taking into account individuals who wouldn't see the film to begin with and that's inflating simply for their positioning on piracy.
supermarioworldE
supermarioworldE - 9/24/2009, 8:11 AM
Wadey - I can't say that either of us is right or wrong, because i believe that once again this is an opinionated question, but nonetheless, I see where you're coming from and who knows, maybe one day I'll stop downloading vids, or you'll start downloading vids
SHHH
SHHH - 9/24/2009, 6:00 PM
wont stop dvdrips
View Recorder