KHAN AT 30: Ricardo Montalban on the Eugenics Superman

KHAN AT 30: Ricardo Montalban on the Eugenics Superman

While rumors abound that Khan will be the villain of JJ Abrams' Star Trek sequel, The Wrath of Khan is celebrating its 30th anniversary and in the first of a series of retrospective articles, we feature Ricardo Montalban reflecting on the character.

By EdGross - Jun 08, 2012 06:06 AM EST
Filed Under: Star Trek

The late Ricardo Montalban first portrayed Eugenics superman Khan Noonian Singh during Star Trek's first season in the episode "Space Seed." Some fifteen years later, producer Harve Bennett came up with the iea of resurrecting the character in Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, much to the delight of audiences and Montalban himself.

This interview with the late actor was conducted by CBM editor Ed Gross back in the 1990s.

RICARDO MONTALBAN ON KHAN: IN HIS OWN WORDS

"In those days, there wasn't the dearth of material that we have today on television. Some shows were quite special, and certainly Star Trek was one of them. I was quite familiar with it. As an actor, I thought it would be great fun to do it. Khan was not the run of the mill sort of portrayal. It had to have a different dimension. That attracted me very much. And when they sent me the script, I thought it was a fascinating character and I loved doing it.



"Khan was a character that was bigger than life. He had to be played that way. He was extremely powerful both mentally and physically, with an enormous amount of pride. but he was not totally villainous. He had some good qualities. I saw a nobility in the man that, unfortunately, was overriden by ambition and a thirst for power. I saw that in the character and played it accordingly. It was very well received at the time, and I was delighted.

"Then I forgot about it. You go on to the next thing, the next thing and the next. I did so many things and finally ended up on Fantasy island. There I was and, lo and behold, they called me again to play this character. I got the script and began reading the role. It was an interesting character again.

"At the time I was so immersed in the character of Fantasy Island, that when I started to articulate the words of Khan for myself, I didn't sound like the character to me. I sounded like Mr. Roarke [from Fantasy Island], and I was very concerned about it. Then I asked Harve Bennett to send me a tpae of the old sho that I did. I ran it two or three times. When I first saw it, I didn't even remember what I did. On the third viewing, a strange thing happened to me and I started reliving the moment, and the mental process that I had arrived at at the time began to work in me and I associated myself with that character more and more. Finally, I took the script, found one of the scenes and did it to myself, and I did feel then that Roarke had disappeared and that indeed I was into this character.



"Now this character presented a different problem. The original character was in total control of the situation. Guided simply by his overriding ambition. The new character, however, was no obsessed. He was a man obsessed with vengeance for the death of his wife, for which he blamed Kirk. if he was bigger than life before, I felt he really had to become bigger than life almost to the point of becoming ludicrous to be effective. If I didn't play it fully and totally obsessed with this, then I think the character would be little and insignificant and uninteresting. The danger was in going overboard. Very often, an actor will play things safely and it works. You can play safe, you can underact, put the lid on and it works beautifully. In this case, I thought if I did that it would be very dull. I had to be, if not deranged, then very close to it. I had to find a tone of really going right to the razor's edge before the character becomes a caricature.

"I don't think the lack of a face-to-face moment between Kirk and Khan was a drawback. Actually, that was an element that was interesting. It was difficult as an actor, but that separation of the two ships gave it a really poignant touch to the scenes. The fact that being so strong, there was so much pressure knowing that he can't get his hands on Kirk. I didn't mind that. I minded as an actor. I wish William Shatner and I had somehow been able to respond to each other at the time. The actual situation, though, I thought was a plug. I think we left the audience wanting them to get together, and we didn't.

"I'm delighted to have been part of this phenomenon."

Quentin Tarantino Finally Explains Why His R-Rated STAR TREK Movie Is Never Going To Happen
Related:

Quentin Tarantino Finally Explains Why His R-Rated STAR TREK Movie Is "Never Going To Happen"

STAR TREK: Colm Meaney On Possible Miles O'Brien Return And What He REALLY Thinks About Trekkies (Exclusive)
Recommended For You:

STAR TREK: Colm Meaney On Possible Miles O'Brien Return And What He REALLY Thinks About Trekkies (Exclusive)

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Metalogan
Metalogan - 6/8/2012, 6:43 AM
Montalbaaaaaaan!!!!
Gmoney84
Gmoney84 - 6/8/2012, 7:23 AM
He tasks me...he tasks me and I shall have him!
Shadowelfz
Shadowelfz - 6/8/2012, 7:29 AM
Khan was a great a villian. A true noble/savage in the vein of Dr. Doom.
WarnerBrother
WarnerBrother - 6/8/2012, 7:31 AM
A truly amazing film.I remember seeing this on opening day back in 82 and the film has a treasured place in my heart and library.

This film was Star Trek's finest hour and set the stage for the film series and Next Generation.

It was such a pleasure to introduce my sons to this film.
wildbillyb
wildbillyb - 6/8/2012, 7:44 AM
i still get freaked out by the ear bug thingy
EastcoastAvenger
EastcoastAvenger - 6/8/2012, 7:56 AM
wildbillyb - I was just about to write the same thing when I read your post! As a kid that thing crawling into the dudes ear freaked me out a little!
Knightstalker
Knightstalker - 6/8/2012, 8:15 AM
My favorite Star Trek movie of all time. JJ Abrams should go back and re-watch TOS and the movies before he makes another action/sci fi film.
drfate
drfate - 6/8/2012, 8:27 AM
a great movie, its drama has stood the test of time and is as fresh today as it was then.
gaikinger
gaikinger - 6/8/2012, 8:31 AM
I think Khan might make an appearance in the new film but will be only a peripheral role as the timeline has been changed and we see how the doors slide for him as well as possibly other easter eggy characters.
Spock
Spock - 6/8/2012, 8:59 AM
A lot of people don't know that Khan was the result of Data's Great Grand father Dr. Arik Soong creation which also was the reason some Klingons didn't have Ridges on there foreheads!
nld3
nld3 - 6/8/2012, 9:09 AM
No need to reboot that movie!
nld3
nld3 - 6/8/2012, 9:12 AM
The reason Klingons didn't have Ridges was the budget. There's no need for these shallow explanations.

BackwardGalaxy
BackwardGalaxy - 6/8/2012, 9:36 AM
He was so freaking good in that role.
Spock
Spock - 6/8/2012, 10:10 AM
@ nld3, WRONG!!! If they could produce people getting transported & shooting Phashers, they could do the ridges--its makeup & prostehics!
Rowsdower
Rowsdower - 6/8/2012, 10:12 AM
That trailer was weird man. Did anyone else catch the sound of the Ghostbusters guns heating up when the Enterprise engines were "revving up?"

Felt like a recut trailer from youtube, complete with awful music.
pintoman
pintoman - 6/8/2012, 10:26 AM
:o) Memories...thank you.
pintoman
pintoman - 6/8/2012, 10:30 AM
@ Spock

The correct chronology is...

1) TOS Klingons: They didn't have the budget (according to Gene)
2) TMP Klingons: Suddenly Klingons have ridges
3) TNG: they reverse-explained the difference using Soong's character.
comicb00kguy
comicb00kguy - 6/8/2012, 10:33 AM
blkyank: Couldn't say it any better.

I don't think I was there opening day, but I do recall seeing this in the theater also. It was probably the following Tuesday. Our theater had $2 Tuesday back then, which was a godsend for poor high school kids like me and my friends. Thirty years later, this is still the best Star Trek movie ever by miles.
Spock
Spock - 6/8/2012, 11:01 AM
@ pintoman (Mckoy)---, yes I heard that before about the budget. But I don't buy that for a moment. That is simular to Lucas using the SAD EXCUSE about not making a STAR WARS Show due to the Tech isn't there yet. THAT is FULL of RUBBISH. Makeup & prostehics was much cheaper back then, then creating visual effects!
pintoman
pintoman - 6/8/2012, 12:47 PM
@Spock

Well, I agree that Lucas has unfortunately become "rubbish." In regards to the Klingons:

http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/inconsistencies/klingon-foreheads.htm
Spock
Spock - 6/8/2012, 2:38 PM
@ pintoman here here!
BillyBatson1000
BillyBatson1000 - 6/8/2012, 3:20 PM
From Hell's heart I stab at thee!
juggy4711
juggy4711 - 6/8/2012, 5:36 PM
WoK is still the best of anything Star Trek.
View Recorder