TASM 2: Emma Stone Says Gwen Saves Spidey More Than He Saves Her

She saves him from a life of fapping.

Considering she dies, I would think so.

She saves him more because... He doesn't save her?

this is news worthy?

Yea,Catwoman saves Batman & Pepper saves Iron Man & Wolverine needed saving by a lady..
..where are the real "super" men at?

Chicks are cool but leave the ass kicking to the guys.
Unless your Wonder Woman but in her film I bet Steve Trevor will save her.

She was the only good thing about TASM. And as many said, Garfield was too old to be playing Parker.
He looks much older in the trailers than he did in TASM.

I guess this is a good news. I'm glad that Gwen and Peter will be working together it gives Gwen better character development.

If it's okay for Gwen to save Tony at the end of IM3 then i'm sure it's okay for Gwen too save Peter. I'm looking forward to TASM 2

"I can't believe i'm actually rooting for the Main protagonist to kill the Main love interest. lol.. But it must be done."-intruder

I do believe I share the same sentiment. I feel quite evil about it too (Stewie-ish). But I'm worried. Will they have the balls to kill off the main character? There are so many nerds in love with this unremarkable woman.

IMAX3D for me.

@Havenless more like, villain's plan in the first movie is to attack the entire city with an experimental device (Ganali Device/ Mirowave Emitter) created by the central company (Oscorp/Wayne Enterprises) in the movie which delivers a chemical gas (Fear Toxin/Lizard Serum) to the population, while the main character must learn to be a hero, inspired by the loss of his parents (or in Peter's case, his parents AND his Uncle).
Then, the second film introduces the main character's arch-nemesis (Green Goblin/Joker) and a character who was formerly friends with/admired the hero but was transformed (Electro AND Harry Osborn/Two-Face), and (presumable) the hero fails to save the life of his romantic interest (Gwen/Rachel).

Clearly The Amazing Spider-Man series is taking heavy inspiration from The Dark Knight Trilogy and is following many of the same story beats, because Batman and Spider-Man are two incredibly similar characters at their core (lonely geniuses who've lost parents and become superheroes). And there's been something of a back-and-forth between their different film versions as well - Raimi's Spider-Man movies are clearly influenced by Burton's Batman movies, the tone of Nolan's Batman movies is possibly an evolution of the tone of Raimi's Spider-Man trilogy, and now Marc Webb's new version of Spider-Man is following the precedent set by Nolan's Batman trilogy. Of course, what's more important is how they change things up each time.

@AC1

I see zero similarity between Burton's Batman and Raimi's Spider-Man series. The tone of the series are opposites. I think if anything Raimi has a similar tone to Donner's Superman, but having watched Raimi films for over 20 years I say all he did is do his own thing!

And Spider-Man and Batman aren't similar! Outside of a deep rouges gallery and dead parents there's not much. Spideys main villains (in the films) were scientists and Peter's friends and not psychopaths with deformities.

And the films take their stories from comics. I don't think they copied Nolan other than to take the plot a little more seriously rather than the lighter take of Raimi. I love TDK series but Nolan isn't the end all be all in comics films!

Remember in Batman Begins when Bruce's scientist parents had to leave him with his aunt and uncle and bailed because they were being hunted for their work and eventually killed in a crash? And then Ra's Al Ghul changed into a giant reptile and then fought Bruce in his high school just like TASM....yeah.

Some of the people here talk outta their ass.

Hopefully they won't forget about him being smart

Hmmm, I thought Peter was meant to be the muscle and the brains but then again this is the new take on things :(

Cant imagine what this Peter would be like under the influence of the symbiote.