DAREDEVIL: BORN AGAIN Showrunner And Star Charlie Cox Explain Creative Overhaul And How Much Has Changed

DAREDEVIL: BORN AGAIN Showrunner And Star Charlie Cox Explain Creative Overhaul And How Much Has Changed

Daredevil: Born Again showrunner Dario Scardapane and lead star Charlie Cox have talked more about the creative overhaul which has brought the Disney+ series more in line with its Netflix predecessor...

By JoshWilding - Jan 25, 2025 10:01 AM EST
Filed Under: Daredevil
Source: SFX

Daredevil: Born Again was originally spearheaded by Matt Corman and Chris Ord. However, roughly halfway through production, Marvel Studios realised the writers were taking the Netflix revival in the wrong direction and a creative overhaul followed.

The Punisher's Dario Scardapane was enlisted to right the ship and that led to recastings, casting additions, a greater level of connectivity to Netflix's Daredevil and, thankfully, more costumed action.

SFX Magazine recently caught up with Scardapane to learn more about the changes. "[The footage] had some really strong points, but it wasn't feeling in line with what Daredevil had been established to be," he explained. 

It's said that the original version of Daredevil: Born Again was a soft reboot which only maintained certain elements of the Netflix series. However, Marvel Studios decided to retroactively make the Defenders Saga part of the MCU which is why a new pilot was shot. 

"At the very end of the Netflix show, Foggy, Karen and Matt had a dream written out on the back of a napkin," the showrunner explained. "We start with that dream. It’s not a dream that needs too much explanation; three good friends go into business together."

Charlie Cox also chimed in to say, "There was a U-turn after the strike, where we were headed in one direction which was interesting and valid. The argument was, if we’re coming back after all these years, we don’t want to just do exactly the same thing. Marvel looked at the episodes and knew it wasn’t quite working."

"We shot a whole new pilot and they reorganised what we had filmed to make it feel more like the show we had shot all those years previously," the actor continued. "Given what a Herculean task that was, it’s very impressive what they achieved."

Everything here sounds incredibly promising and it sounds like the new Marvel Television has found the right direction to take the Man Without Fear in when he returns to the MCU this Spring. 

Check out a textless version of Daredevil: Born Again's SFX Magazine cover below. 

Gi-Al-Wu-Zaw-AAWZh-I-1

In Marvel Television's Daredevil: Born Again, Matt Murdock (Charlie Cox), a blind lawyer with heightened abilities is fighting for justice through his bustling law firm, while former mob boss Wilson Fisk (Vincent D'Onofrio) pursues his own political endeavors in New York. When their past identities begin to emerge, both men find themselves on an inevitable collision course.

The series also stars Margarita Levieva, Deborah Ann Woll, Elden Henson, Zabryna Guevara, Nikki James, Genneya Walton, Arty Froushan, Clark Johnson, Michael Gandolfini, with Ayelet Zurer and Jon Bernthal. Dario Scardapane is showrunner.

Episodes are directed by Justin Benson & Aaron Moorhead, Michael Cuesta, Jeffrey Nachmanoff, and David Boyd; and executive producers are Kevin Feige, Louis D’Esposito, Brad Winderbaum, Sana Amanat, Chris Gary, Dario Scardapane, Christopher Ord & Matthew Corman, and Justin Benson & Aaron Moorhead.

Daredevil: Born Again premieres on Disney+ on March 4, 2025.

Rumored Update On DAREDEVIL: BORN AGAIN Season 3 Plans And Some Big Season 2 Surprises - Possible SPOILERS
Related:

Rumored Update On DAREDEVIL: BORN AGAIN Season 3 Plans And Some Big Season 2 Surprises - Possible SPOILERS

DAREDEVIL: BORN AGAIN Star Charlie Cox Talks MCU Future And Awesome Possible Team-Up With THE AVENGERS
Recommended For You:

DAREDEVIL: BORN AGAIN Star Charlie Cox Talks MCU Future And "Awesome" Possible Team-Up With THE AVENGERS

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

harryba11zack
harryba11zack - 1/25/2025, 10:26 AM
just fix the shit!
Comicmoviejunki
Comicmoviejunki - 1/25/2025, 11:46 AM
@harryba11zack - YOU DO IT!!
harryba11zack
harryba11zack - 1/25/2025, 11:52 AM
@Comicmoviejunki - b1tch pay meeee!
WakandaTech
WakandaTech - 1/25/2025, 10:34 AM
Daredevil: Born Again is a big deal for Marvel

It needs to kill it

MisterBones
MisterBones - 1/25/2025, 10:50 AM
“At the very end of the Netflix show, Foggy, Karen and Matt had a dream written out on the back of a napkin," the showrunner explained. "We start with that dream.”

I like that
McMurdo
McMurdo - 1/25/2025, 10:52 AM
Wait so how much of this old footage was chopped and utilized for the new series? Surely they didn't just reshoot the pilot. If so that's concerning but I thought they had reshot the large majority of the series, no?
Polaris
Polaris - 1/25/2025, 11:05 AM
@McMurdo - Iirc they weren't done shooting when the strike started so I guess they didn't actually reshoot that much, just kept shooting with new scripts.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 1/25/2025, 10:59 AM
While I am glad that we are ultimately getting a show that’s more in line with the Netflix version of the character , I still am very intrigued to see or hear what the original iteration of the show with Corman & Ord as the showrunners was all about…

Aside from being a soft reboot presumably that only maintained some elements from the Netflix show , Did it have a lighter tone akin to Waid’s DD or was it more procedural then the previous serialized incarnation (perhaps both?).

I do hope we eventually learn more about it just for curiosity’s sake but as of now , the show looks good as is and I can’t wait to see it!!.

User Comment Image
supermanrex
supermanrex - 1/25/2025, 11:17 AM
@TheVisionary25 - it sounds like it would have went south. like more courtroom vs DD action. people would not have dug it. i imagine he wouldnt even have dawned the costume until three or four episodes in. and then from that point DD action in costume is probably at the end of each episode or just amounting to a couple minutes each show. another super hero show focusing mainly on the secret ID vs the superhero in costume.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 1/25/2025, 11:27 AM
@supermanrex - the report is that like the Born Again trailer indicates that Matt gives up being Daredevil which is what might have happened in that too albeit for a different reason then a line being crossed like he says in the trailer…

He wouldn’t have suited back up until episode which makes me wonder when he’ll suit back up in this considering it’s now 2 seasons of 9 episodes each for now rather then 1 full season of 18 as it was originally gonna be.

Going by Charlie’s previous comments , it did seem like it might have focused more on Matt as a lawyer and the procedural/episodic nature of him taking on different cases with a bit of a serialized thread going through it

I would not have minded that since some DD comics have gone down that route but again , depends on execution

Also to be fair , Matt didn’t really put on the costume much in his own show either if I remember correctly.
supermanrex
supermanrex - 1/25/2025, 11:45 AM
@TheVisionary25 - matt was in a sort of costume alot in the netflix show. the red costume was mainly special timing, but he always went out to fight in something. black mask, bandage hands etc. the point is there was alot of super hero action then vs what the original show sounded before they overhauled born again. people honestly wouldnt have minded the lighter tone if we didnt lose DD action time.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 1/25/2025, 11:47 AM
@supermanrex - ahhh fair enough

Will be interesting to see how much DD action there is in this show overall if the lack of it was the case originally.
supermanrex
supermanrex - 1/25/2025, 12:16 PM
@TheVisionary25 - the trailer emphasized alot of action. but of course that's a trailer. but i wouldn't think they wouldnt pay all that money for re shoots and rewrites unless they was going all in to make it align with netflix more. cox and vincent already on record said the show is more brutal then netflix. if they did their jobs right then we will get a nice balance between matt the lawyer and matt the superhero.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 1/25/2025, 12:19 PM
@supermanrex - yep

For all we know know , those are the only action scenes we get

However I agree and hope it does turn out well.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 1/25/2025, 1:25 PM
@TheVisionary25 - Other than starting out with the first few episodes seeming to be mostly coutroom drama and no action I am unsure how much if anything main narrative wise has changed OTHER than opting to ditch the idea of sidelining Karen and Foggy, likely killed offscreen. There seems to be action from the start now, and may still kill one of the two, but always appeared intent to launch with the the White Tiger story that leads to his death and the mantle handed down, always seemed to have Mayor Fisk as the backdrop but probably included more of his campaign for office too whereas looks more likely he will already have won the election at the start.

ONLY major question for me is if they always intended to also include Muse, Bullseye and Punisher in the first 9 episodes or not beyond that initial trial of the century story but doubt it was ever any more comedic than the occasional levity we had over on Netflix but maybe NOT AS dark and violant as it seems this may be (at least at times anyway).
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 1/25/2025, 1:30 PM
@Apophis71 - you are probably right

The exclusion of Foggy & Karen did feel odd to me so if they do write off both or kill off one now , it would connect better then them just not being there

I feel like Muse was gonna be a part of the original show but Bullseye and Frank are new additions since we didn’t hear about Bernthal coming back till after the overhaul
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 1/25/2025, 1:43 PM
@TheVisionary25 - That IS how I see things too, Muse was already set to be part of it and Bullseye/Frank added in for more action.
Vigor
Vigor - 1/25/2025, 12:00 PM
Creatives will hate this, but Marvels Mantra going forward should just be give people what they want. It's working out dividends for the sonic, the hedgehog series

People want daredevil back. But not some reimagined daredevil. They literally want daredevil season 4. Because it worked so well before. Don't fix what isn't broken

Im glad marvel TV is hearing that message
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 1/25/2025, 12:18 PM
@Vigor - oh man , I disagree entirely and that is such a depressing thought to me

You see it every day on this site that people want different things and it’s rare to get a real unified consensus to something

If you don’t allow creatives to do what they want to do then you wouldn’t have the great moments you have gotten in the MCU and admittedly , you may not also get the less then great moments but at the end of the day , doing any project is risky since it can go either way


At that point , just let AI make your entertainment for you so they can just shit out what they think people want.

This is a dangerous statement man and one I can rant about for days but I’ll just leave it at that.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 1/25/2025, 12:39 PM
@Vigor - however I will say that while I agree with not trying to fix what isn’t broken , I also appreciate them trying to do something different even if it wasn’t quite working in Marvel’s eyes.
Vigor
Vigor - 1/25/2025, 12:51 PM
@TheVisionary25 - I hear what you're saying. And I wouldn't have made my statement several years ago when it seemed like mcu could do no wrong. But after missteps like secret invasion and thor 4 and the focus on all these much lesser known characters in phase 5 (although I love them!), from a business and making g money standpoint i feel like playing it a little safer may well, be safe

But i totally hear what you're going with
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 1/25/2025, 1:10 PM
@Vigor - I get what you mean but even something like Secret Invasion or Thor 4 as you mentioned have had their redeemable aspects or things I have liked enough about them even with their issues (plus Love & Thunder was still a success)

It’s a weird time for the box office in general right now but the movies for the most part are still making money.

I just personally with how toxic fandom in general for properties has gotten would rather always be on the side of the creatives then anything else…

I just don’t want to reward those people of which the majority now make up this site.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 1/25/2025, 1:40 PM
@Vigor - Oh the MCU has always done things wrong, just rose tinted glasses and all that but pretty much all of phase one was extremely formulaic with third act problems even when well recieved and included films considered flops at the time like TIH and Iron Man 2 moving into phase 2 with Thor Dark World but I get what you mean, folk were generaly more forgiving and even if things have been hit and miss for me LIKED they tried new things and less reliant on old tired formulaic CBM narratives post Endgame.

We will never know for sure but still tend to think they would have ironed out most the issues with almost all the content in phase 4 & 5 if there hadn't been so many external factors cos everything after Black Widow till DP&W had to deal with the pandemic and/or strikes at various points of production (and most cases with some of the filming too).
fanboy03191
fanboy03191 - 1/25/2025, 5:09 PM
@Vigor - Indeed.
dagenspear
dagenspear - 1/25/2025, 10:31 PM
@Vigor - I think they've never been a do no wrong.

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder