LOKI Merchandise Seemingly Reveals The Hero's New Moniker In The Marvel Multiverse

@ChocolateMousse - Dude, Loki's been more interesting as a hero than he ever has as a villain.

@URCOMMENTSUCKS - never had a screen name described his own comment so well. Earth X had the best approach to this: who the hell decided he was to be the god of evil? Not him. And it was his nature AS a trickster god that allowed him to question his very nature. Why couldn’t he be destined to be happy? So yes, changing his fate in the comics, kid Loki, all the way to his agent of Asgard and god of stories arc was a truly GOOD character development arc for him. Otherwise, besides creating the Avengers he was becoming so one note and boring he himself would HATE how predictable he became.

@URCOMMENTSUCKS - Cool your tits

@DENNISsystem - >never had a screen name described his own comment so well.

At least my username can be spelled without stuttering.

>Earth X had the best approach to this

Earth X was an alternate universe where Aesir were mutants. Don't care.

>who the hell decided he was to be the god of evil?

He did. He's the one who came up with that moniker.

>Not him.

Yes, him. I think it was during the times when Stan Lee was still writing Thor comics where Loki started referring to himself as that.

>And it was his nature AS a trickster god that allowed him to question his very nature.

No, it wasn't. He was a power-hungry dipshit who sought power and wanted to bring on the suffering to those he felt wronged him. His motive was not to try to prove his worth or be seen as equal. His point was the opposite: that he can outsmart and outpower everyone and impose suffering onto everyone.

>Why couldn’t he be destined to be happy?

Because he's a villain who murders innocents and seeks to rule over everything with an iron fist. He didn't deserve happiness. That's his contrast with a character like Thor. Thor is a man who endures great pain and still stays true to himself no matter what. Loki is a self-centered snake who bites the hand feeds it. They're Yin and Yang. That's called basic storytelling.

>So yes, changing his fate in the comics, kid Loki, all the way to his agent of Asgard and god of stories arc was a truly GOOD character development arc for him.

No, it wasn't. It was character assassination, character degradation, and, most of all, Agent of Asgard and God of Stories already had been using MCUfied Loki. So that's a shitty argument already if you're using MCUfied BS that retcons the original character? Like that shit about Loki being genderwhater and gay. That came after the MCU Loki became popular among the fangirl community, they started writing those terrible fanfics with Thor and Loki, and there was a demand for gay Loki in comics, and Marvel's editorial was stupid enough to do it, even though the previous comics absolutely dismiss that idea, as he was always portrayed as a hyper-masculien straight dude who only likes women and was in fact married to a woman named Sigyn whom he used just to have sex with her and gaslight her.

>Otherwise, besides creating the Avengers he was becoming so one note and boring he himself would HATE how predictable he became.

I don't know whether you're referring to the comics or the movies. If it's about the comics, then you clearly haven't read anything with Loki beyond the shit you mentioned, because him being the catalyst behind the creation of the Avengers is one of his least impressive feats. If you're talking about the movies, then also [frick]ing wrong, because had the MCU actually did the right thing and faithfully adapted the story of Ragnarok, and had Loki as the main villain who fulfils his destiny as the villain and brings on the end of the world, it would make him a far better character than him being reduced to a third wheel who acts like an SNL sketch.

@philinterrupted - Yes. And I also remember that he's supposed to be the King of Jotunheim, but it seems the MCU doesn't remember it.

@SpiderParker - You're still having a hissie months later, you little insecure P-word? I won't go on a big rant about your stupid overlong comment, so I'll instead get to the basics:

1. Your ad hominem attacks are irrelevant. So shove them up your [redacted].

2. Loki is a genocidal piece of shit who murdered innocent people for fun. Debate that, not whine about my comments for their mere existence.

3. The MCU didn't have Loki from an alternate universe turn out to be a good guy. They took a villain from their universe, who was, get this, a VILLAIN, and made him a good guy.

In short, [frick] off and nothing in your shit response refutes any of my points. They all still stand.

@URCOMMENTSUCKS - In Norse Mythology, Loki mated with a woman, a man, and a horse. Not all at once though, different tales.

@santoanderson -

@lazlodaytona - He has an infectious positivity that we all thought came from his roles in Temple of Doom and The Goonies, but after watching him in interviews, in Everything Everywhere and Loki, I think that's just who he is.

The world needs more Ke Huy Quan. He's hard not to love.

@Usernametaken - I whole heartedly agree. He's the kinda dude u just wanna hug when you see him. And he had me sobbing at the end of Everything, Everywhere when begging to his wife. I mean, dang!

@bobevanz - happy birthday

@bobevanz -