An Analysis Of The New Wonder Woman

(Another one? Yup) Is Gal Gadot the right woman to play the Amazon Princess?

Editorial Opinion
By TwistedKingdom - Dec 05, 2013 04:12 PM EST
Filed Under: Wonder Woman
Source: eonline.com, oscars.org



As with Ben Affleck getting chosen this summer to be the next Caped Crusader, news of Gal Gadot nabbing the monumental role of Wonder Woman caused a stir amongst fans.

Hollywood has been trying to bring Diana to life for years, from Joss Whedon's feature adaptation, to the unaired David E. Kelly pilot, to the CW's proposed "Amazon" which is currently "on hold". At long last, Wonder Woman will finally make her big screen debut in 2015's "Man of Steel" sequel.

For those unfamiliar with Gadot, she started working as a model after winning Miss Israel in 2004. She served a two-year term in the Israeli Army while still modeling. Her first acting role was on an Israeli TV drama in 2007.

Her U.S. credits include minor roles in Steve Carell and Tina Fey's "Date Night" and Tom Cruise and Cameron Diaz's "Knight and Day". But some may recognize her better from the "Fast and Furious" franchise.

Taking all of this (and more) into consideration, Wonder Woman is just too large and important of a role to cast Gadot in. Yesterday's announcement was met with mixed reactions, to say the least, as fans expressed two major concerns…

HER ACTING ABILITY

One can't help but question Snyder's decisions so far.


While Affleck has grown as an actor, he's nowhere near the caliber of once rumored frontrunner Josh Brolin.

Affleck has received praise for his directing on features like "The Town" and Best Picture winner "Argo". But being a talented director doesn't necessarily make someone a better actor.

And while Affleck has Oscars for writing and producing, Brolin was actually nominated by the Academy for his acting. He received a nod in 2008 for his supporting role in "Milk".

So when someone like Brolin is passed over in favor of Affleck, it begs the question "How much of a priority is acting ability"?

That brings us to Gadot. All audiences have to go by are the bit roles she's had so far. As mentioned earlier, she's appeared in the "Fast and Furious" movies, a franchise known for its spectacle rather than the work of its thespians.

Yes, she is an unknown. And unknowns have been cast in superhero movies before.

But looking at previous superhero franchises where relative unknowns were chosen, these actors had solid bodies of work behind them. Christian Bale. Andrew Garfield. Henry Cavill. Neither was a household name when they were cast, yet they had already cut their teeth in meaty roles.

Some argue "Snyder must've seen something in her". This just says he preferred Gadot over the other two he brought in. It's like if Bryan Singer brought in Jessica Alba, Megan Fox and Kristen Stewart to read for a new Jean Grey part.

HER SIZE

The good news, she's 5'9" and stunning. The bad news, she's so thin.

Will Snyder throw her into the costume as is? Of course not. He's smarter than that. She'll undoubtedly train with Mark Twight's "Gym Jones". But, given her natural frame, realistically, just how much larger can she get? Amazonian warrior is far fetched.

Men pack on muscle for roles all the time but directors cast an actor already a reasonable size. See Chris Evans and Captain America. Chris Hemsworth and Thor. Christian Bale's transformation from emaciated to Dark Knight is an extreme case.

Wonder Woman is every bit Superman's equal and she looks like it. That's where Gadot has to get to. Only, in this case it would need to be Affleck's Batman not Cavill's Kal-El. Here's why…

Cavill bulked up for "Man of Steel" but he's still listed at only 6'1". Affleck, on the other hand, is an imposing 6'4". E! Online reported he's already started working out. Here's the article.

http://www.eonline.com/news/483262/ben-affleck-s-batman-body-don-t-get-too-pumped-up-yet

When cameras roll, Affleck will be more "Superman" in size and stature than Cavill. As an Amazon, it doesn't matter who Wonder Woman stands next to. Physically she demands just as much attention as the men in the Justice League and it's not because of her attire.


So Gadot can't just "bulk up", she'll have to completely transform. She'll need to be able to stand next to Affleck and not get consumed by his presence.

And not only will she have to build all of this muscle, she'll need to maintain it. (More on why later).

Then again, Snyder bringing in petite prospects like Olga Kurylenko and Gadot suggests the Amazon size may not be as important to him as casting an exotic beauty. Otherwise, wouldn't choosing an actress with an athletic build be more logical?

It's easier to see Gadot packing on a few pounds and getting toned rather than actually reaching the necessary physique. Unfortunately, that wouldn't be enough.

Audiences need to believe it's Wonder Woman on screen. A goddess. That just feels unreasonable based on where Gadot is now.

Then there's her other career to consider. Just look at the cover of any fashion magazine. Models today are a certain size. Wouldn't putting on muscle affect her modeling?

WONDER WOMAN 2015 AND BEYOND

This is a personal concern.

Whomever was cast in this role wasn't just being chosen for "Man of Steel 2". This would be the Wonder Woman for the entire run in the DC Cinematic Universe.


She was being cast for the "Justice League" film and, more importantly, her very own franchise.

There are a handful of women in Hollywood who can carry a movie. And they all have Oscars. Wonder Woman needed a solo adventure to prove the actress in the role could carry a film. That she could have an entire franchise built around her. This is so, very crucial.

The same goes for the actors cast as the Flash and the other Justice League characters rumored to appear. Actors can "hide" in an ensemble piece but a starring vehicle is entirely different.

Is Warner Bros ready to risk $150 to $200 million on a Gadot? Are they ready to bank on her and give her a franchise off of Snyder's word alone? If she doesn't pan out they can obviously recast. But then the question becomes "why cast her in the first place"?

IN CLOSING

Maybe Gadot will surprise everyone. Maybe she'll steal every scene she's in. It would be fantastic if she did. Time will tell. But her pulling off Wonder Woman just feels like a stretch. There's a lot more to the character than a pretty face.


As stated before, she's every bit Superman's equal - in power and mystique. She's breathtaking and simultaneously intimidating.

Wonder Woman exudes elegance and grace as much as she does strength and power. A warrior goddess. She's mother and protector to us all.

Ironically, Warner Bros. had already cast an actress who embodies all of these traits.

The pilot got a lot wrong but who Kelly cast as the lead wasn't one of them. She got the role for a reason. At 5'11 Palicki is already genetically blessed, which would've given Mark Twight a lot to work with.

Adrianne Palicki + Gym Jones = Wonder Woman.

What do you think about Snyder's choice?
WONDER WOMAN Fan-Art Imagines Three Top Casting Picks As Princess Diana
Related:

WONDER WOMAN Fan-Art Imagines Three Top Casting Picks As Princess Diana

WONDER WOMAN: 8 Actors Who Could Play DC Studios' Diana Prince In The DCU
Recommended For You:

WONDER WOMAN: 8 Actors Who Could Play DC Studios' Diana Prince In The DCU

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

BenjiWest
BenjiWest - 12/5/2013, 4:37 PM
I recall someone once said that its far better to cast unknowns for superhero characters without mask, this allows the audience far less preconceptions, and allows the audience to identify and relate to them better as that character. Whereas with a masked superhero a more prominent actor is needed so the audience cab infer better to their tone and emotional reactions having seen it without a mask.
DeathstrokeTerminator
DeathstrokeTerminator - 12/5/2013, 5:08 PM
Just My Thoughts

1. You don't win best picture if the acting is not great, no matter how good the directing is.
2. You don't have to be an Oscar nominated/winning actor to nail a role (Ex. Chris Evans- Captain America)
3. Brolin would've been great...5 or 6 years ago, he is too old now. At least with Affleck, even though he is only 4 years Brolin's junior, he has a youthful look that is comparable to Cavill's Superman.
4. Ben Affleck being involved is a blessing in disguise (pun intended) because he will most likely direct the Batman solo movie when we eventually get around to it, and if you've seen his movies, especially The Town, you know its in good hands.
5. Gadot will get toned, she will NOT and doesn't have to look like Gina Carano. It's amazing, because so many people wanted Jamie Alexander and she is about the same size and frame as Gal is, (google it!)but because people saw her wearing a Wonder Woman-esque costume and kicking ass in Thor, she is the only person they can think of.
6. Fanboys are always bitching about how they want an "unknown" to take the roles, well she may have been in Fast and Furious, but that is all we have seen her in so it doesn't get much more unknown than that as far as her acting abilities are concerned.
7. The size thing! Are you Serious?! If WB can make normal sized human beings look like Hobbits, making Affleck and Cavill stand equal is no problem AT ALL!
SuperCat
SuperCat - 12/5/2013, 6:11 PM
1) Beauty: check

2) Height: check

3) Weight: Needs work

4) Acting: Uncertain
BenjiWest
BenjiWest - 12/5/2013, 6:21 PM
Nice checklist at least she's got two. I mean Cavill probably had just as similar benchmarks prior to playing Superman.
Tainted87
Tainted87 - 12/5/2013, 7:36 PM
@Slade
Jamie's a fan-typecast, it's true, but she's also a good deal more energetic in what people have seen her in. That's a big selling point for me. You see an actor like Chris' brother Liam Hemsworth, and he's a good-looking guy, but his acting is lousy. Why? Because he looks like he'd rather be somewhere else. He looks like he's ready to just get it over with and move on to something else. He doesn't know how to give a convincing delivery of his lines, which unfortunately, makes him a really big disappointment in the Mockingjay series.

I need to see what the actress can do. I need to see if she's enthused, if she can get loud, if she can be assertive, or if she's just going to play cute, sexy, and nothing else. Is that unfair? I don't think it is.
quas666
quas666 - 12/5/2013, 10:26 PM
Adrianne Palicki sucked as Wonder Woman. I seen the pilot of Amazon not to long ago and it was genuinely shitty. As far as Gadot goes I'm really not sure she has what it takes as far as acting but her look has me partially sold (needs to tone up as you guys have said).
BenjiWest
BenjiWest - 12/6/2013, 9:39 AM
I've never seen her in anything, does she have an accent? If you seen Haywire you knew then and there Gina would never make a good Wonder Woman. Why at all would they even look at Palicki, apparently the executives of multiple entertainment thought it so awful they refused to air it.
BenjiWest
BenjiWest - 12/6/2013, 2:08 PM
@BlackJack10 - Nice, I like the thought of Wonder Woman having a slight accent, it adds to exotic nature of her. Not really familiar with an Israeli accent, bet even better if hers is sexy. Tired of the flat baritoned Wonder Woman voice of her animated versions.
IronSuperBatWonder
IronSuperBatWonder - 12/7/2013, 12:03 PM
The Author of this would likely fall in the category of people who hated the casting of Anne Hatheway Disney princess Catwoman, Heath Ledger Brokebake Joker, Ben Affleck Daredevil Batman, Michael Keaton Mr. Mom Batman. Those hating people obviously never learn as the years go by and there surprised again again, but I digress.

In the matter of Gal Gadot,
Lynda Carter, (The beloved Wonder Woman of the 70's)
was 5'9 and 122 lbs during her Wonder Woman time. She also was Miss USA.
Gal Gadot is 5'9 and 115 lbs and she was Miss Israel. She also was a Sports Trainer/Instructor for the Israli military and done all of her own stunts in all of the Fast and Furious films she was in.
According to DC Wonder Woman herself is 6'0 and 130lbs
Both Lynda Carter and Gal Gadot have similar weight and both are the same height. Both were Beauty pageant queens.
How big do people think Wonder Woman is? I'm sure Gal will train and gain weight (As all actors do for roles) and she'll weigh as much as Lynda Carter NO time.
View Recorder