Connie Nielsen Says It's "Crazy" That WONDER WOMAN 3 Is Not Moving Forward: "I Hope They Change Their Minds"

Connie Nielsen Says It's "Crazy" That WONDER WOMAN 3 Is Not Moving Forward: "I Hope They Change Their Minds"

Wonder Woman and Justice League star Connie Nielsen can't understand why DC Studios has no interest in moving forward with a third movie starring Gal Gadot...

By MarkCassidy - Oct 10, 2024 02:10 PM EST
Filed Under: Wonder Woman

A third Wonder Woman movie was in development at Warner Bros. right up until James Gunn and Peter Safran took over as co-heads of the relaunched DC Studios, and the decision to scrap the project evidently came as quite a surprise to a number of people involved with the now defunct threequel and the previous WW films.

While speaking to Den of Geek about her return as Lucilla in Ridley Scott's Gladiator 2, Connie Nielsen - who played Queen Hippolyta in both Wonder Woman movies and Justice League - admitted to being baffled by the studio's call.

“I think it’s crazy. I mean, frankly, I don’t understand it,” Nielsen tells the site. “[Wonder Woman] made $800 million just in the movie theaters, and it has an enormous and passionate, passionate fan base. These are spectacular films, and there’s just no reason I can understand whatsoever for not investing in that. If I were a business person, I would say that’s money on the table. It’s right there. Plus every time we’ve done it, [it was] with budgets that were way smaller than any of the other DC budgets.”

While the first movie was indeed a huge hit, WW84 is seen as a far inferior film, and didn't come close to making what its predecessor did at the box office - though a day-and-date theatrical/streaming release couldn't have helped in that regard.

“It’s a pity,” Nielsen adds. “I really hope that they change their minds, and that they realize this is crazy. This is a billion dollars that is lying on the table. Not claiming those fans and making them happy is something I just don’t really understand at all.”

Jenkins was all set to return to helm the third instalment, and had reportedly completed her script. Things changed when (or before, depending on who you believe) Gunn and Safran came aboard, however, and the threequel was shelved.

According to one report, the initial plan was to move forward with the project under the DCU banner, but it was actually Jenkins who decided to walk away after "receiving notes on the treatment she submitted to the studio." It seems WB higher-ups weren't completely sold on her pitch, which was said to contain "character arc problems which rivalled that of Wonder Woman 1984."

More recently, star Gal Gadot claimed that Wonder Woman 3 was still happening without Jenkins.

"I had a meeting with (DC Studios CEOs) Peter Safran and James Gunn, and they both told me that they're going to develop a third Wonder Woman with me," the Heart of Stone star told USA Today. "They said, 'You're in the best hands, you've got nothing to worry about.' Time will tell."

Gunn didn't weigh in on Gadot's comments, but a trade report would later clarify that Wonder Woman 3 was not currently in the works, and there are no plans in place for Gadot to reprise the role in the DCU.

There are no current plans (as far as we know, at least) for any incarnation of Wonder Woman in the first chapter of the DCU slate, "Gods and Monsters," but a Max TV series titled Paradise Lost is in development that will focus on “a Game of Thrones-type story about Themyscira.”

ABSOLUTE WONDER WOMAN #2 Recap And Review - The Masterpiece Of The Absolute Universe You Must Read
Related:

ABSOLUTE WONDER WOMAN #2 Recap And Review - The Masterpiece Of The Absolute Universe You Must Read

ABSOLUTE WONDER WOMAN #1 Recap And Review - A Bit Of A Let Down
Recommended For You:

ABSOLUTE WONDER WOMAN #1 Recap And Review - A Bit Of A Let Down

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
Lisa89
Lisa89 - 10/10/2024, 2:04 PM
Do 'WW3' as an Elseworlds story, as Gunn currently has No Plans At All to make a Wonder Woman film.
Just keep the budget reasonable.
DanFlashesShirt
DanFlashesShirt - 10/10/2024, 3:44 PM
@Lisa89 - he literally announced a Max series called Paradise Lost set on Themyscara.

Also NO ONE would go to see a sequel to that pile of trash.
Lisa89
Lisa89 - 10/10/2024, 3:53 PM
@DanFlashesShirt - He literally announced a Max series called Paradise Lost set on Themyscara… set BEFORE the birth of Diana.
GameOn
GameOn - 10/10/2024, 6:18 PM
@Lisa89 - I mean, do you think he would do that with zero plans to make a WW movie in the near future?
Lisa89
Lisa89 - 10/10/2024, 10:48 PM
@GameOn - How do you define “near future”? If Gunn announces a WW movie tomorrow, it would be for 2027 at the soonest.
GameOn
GameOn - 10/11/2024, 8:29 AM
@Lisa89 - 2027 is a lot sooner than “no plans at all”
Lisa89
Lisa89 - 10/11/2024, 11:25 AM
@GameOn - I wrote "If Gunn announces a WW movie tomorrow, it would be for 2027 at the soonest."
He hasn't announced one. There is no indication that he will announce one anytime soon. Most of the projects he HAS announced are still in very early pre-production and may, at best, be out by 2027. A 'WW3' (with Gadot) already has a script and half the cast ready to go.
JobinJ
JobinJ - 10/10/2024, 2:06 PM
First one was great

WW84 was dogshit.

Hal should still be WW. I thought she did well.
Conquistador
Conquistador - 10/10/2024, 2:07 PM
I didn't mind WW 84, but I'm not going miss not having a WW3.

I would have preferred a proper Man of Steel sequel, but here we are...let's move on.
Nomis929
Nomis929 - 10/10/2024, 2:08 PM
They really screwed the pooch with 'Wonder Woman '84'. It was so different from the first movie in style and tone and the plot was so bad.

They should've done an adaptation of "the Contest" as the sequel. With Rosario Dawson as Artemis.

User Comment Image
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 10/10/2024, 2:27 PM
@Nomis929 - Man, there was a stretch in the 90s where comic book artists just lost all sense of human anatomy.
UncleHarm1
UncleHarm1 - 10/10/2024, 2:41 PM
@Clintthahamster - User Comment Image
Nomis929
Nomis929 - 10/10/2024, 2:42 PM
@Clintthahamster - It was the 'IMAGE' affect. ;)

User Comment Image
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 10/10/2024, 3:08 PM
@Nomis929 - Larson, McFarlane, even Silvestri had their issues from time to time, but Liefeld was the absolute pits. I mean, what even is this?

User Comment Image
Nomis929
Nomis929 - 10/10/2024, 3:34 PM
@Clintthahamster - For me, the only artist of those late '80s Early '90s that left MARVEL to form IMAGE that impressed me was Jim Lee.

His style developed into something that was consistanly solid. Extermely stylistic but not over the top.

User Comment Image

The rest were all hit or miss.

However, I did like That McFarlene brought somthing new to Spiderman but the shine wore off for me on Spawn.

I will Say t hat Marc Silvestri come in to his own a bit later while doing Witchblade but it took some time. And I'm really diggin' his style now.

User Comment Image
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 10/10/2024, 4:17 PM
@Nomis929 - Silvestri's run on X-Men is an all-timer for me, but yeah, that recent work is very impressive.
Nomis929
Nomis929 - 10/11/2024, 12:15 AM
@Clintthahamster - I'm old school Bronze age when it comes to the X-Men..John Byrne and terry Austin is who i think of when I think of them.
RolandD
RolandD - 10/11/2024, 12:36 AM
@Nomis929 - Gotta love their work on X-Men but I actually preferred Cockrum even though he had a short run. Sometimes Byrne’s work was too cartoony like the cover of the issue with a giant Dark Phoenix. Austin’s inks were unparalleled though. With that WW cover, I was looking for Liefeld’s signature but it was a masterpiece compared to the cover @Clintthahamster posted.
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 10/11/2024, 6:53 AM
@Nomis929 - That was a hair before my time, but I read and loved all those books once I got into X-Men. All the artists on Claremont's run hold up really well (even if Claremont's writing is more than a little maudlin and overwrought for my tastes these days.)
WakandaTech
WakandaTech - 10/10/2024, 2:10 PM
Maybe because the last one was a complete dumpster fire critically and financially

But she still does not understand why they just can't make another one

lol
JustAWaffle
JustAWaffle - 10/10/2024, 2:22 PM
User Comment Image
Steel86
Steel86 - 10/10/2024, 2:39 PM
Lol, she just ignoring part two like everyone else did. Anywhats WW won't be ignored just not her and Gal's version. WW will be just fine when Gunn decides to bring her back.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 10/10/2024, 2:44 PM
@Steel86 - yeah

I wouldn’t be surprised if Paradise Lost is our enteyway into getting Diana in this universe

That series could help build and flesh out that Themyscira and the Amazonian culture so WW doesn’t have to.
Forthas
Forthas - 10/10/2024, 2:43 PM
That entire take on Wonder Woman was wrong! Even the first one was overrated! I am glad they have moved on.
DanFlashesShirt
DanFlashesShirt - 10/10/2024, 3:47 PM
@Forthas - oh, the one Snyder oversaw?
Forthas
Forthas - 10/10/2024, 4:15 PM
@DanFlashesShirt -

User Comment Image
KennKathleen
KennKathleen - 10/10/2024, 6:33 PM
@Forthas - User Comment Image
Forthas
Forthas - 10/10/2024, 9:06 PM
@KennKathleen -

User Comment Image
KennKathleen
KennKathleen - 10/11/2024, 7:39 AM
@Forthas - User Comment Image
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 10/10/2024, 2:43 PM
I mean , I get perspective to an extent but she likely doesn’t know or hasn’t paid attention to the fact they are more or less soft rebooting the universe hence her confusion.

That’s really the only reason WW3 isn’t happening and not due to the mixed critical reception or B.O of 1984 (the latter was affected by the pandemic so the studio would be more understandable to its performance)…

Also many movies have had mixed critical receptions and still gotten sequels.

Anyway i liked the first one and while the sequel was inferior to it , I got some enjoyment in that aswell!!.

User Comment Image
Moriakum
Moriakum - 10/10/2024, 2:58 PM
Did she see WW1984?
campblood
campblood - 10/10/2024, 3:06 PM
Well I mean Wonder Woman r6pes a guy in part 2 so I see what 3 isn’t happening
Steel86
Steel86 - 10/10/2024, 3:19 PM
@campblood - Right, it makes me laugh when I see a review on an older film and there like, " That wouldn't happen now a days or that was the time. WW84 and Poor Things are currently people.
ModHaterSLADE
ModHaterSLADE - 10/10/2024, 3:06 PM
Guess she's either in denial or oblivious to how bad WW1984 was when it completely killed the momentum for a part 3...
ProfessorWhy
ProfessorWhy - 10/10/2024, 3:18 PM
Gal was a bad choice, and the WW movies were old hotdog water
MisterBones
MisterBones - 10/10/2024, 3:18 PM
User Comment Image
99OPTIMISTPRIME
99OPTIMISTPRIME - 10/10/2024, 3:33 PM
Had Gal Gadot been able to sort of grow her star power after the first Wonder Woman movie, I think the trilogy would've happened.
micvalpro
micvalpro - 10/10/2024, 4:30 PM
@99OPTIMISTPRIME - She kinda did. Problem is shes kind of a one trick pony. Lets see what happens after Snow White.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 10/10/2024, 3:34 PM
They will do Wonder Woman at some point.

They're rebooting all of DC. We'll see everyone at some point. Wonder Woman, Aquaman, they're even doing a Lanterns series. Oh and a Wonder Woman prequel series. We'll get there.

It might not be the Gal Gadot Wonder Woman, but who seriously cares? It's the character that counts not just one particular iteration.
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder