WONDER WOMAN Star Gal Gadot Confirms That Brett Ratner Is No Longer Involved With The Sequel

WONDER WOMAN Star Gal Gadot Confirms That Brett Ratner Is No Longer Involved With The Sequel

Actress Gal Gadot appeared on the TODAY Show to address reports that she would not return as Wonder Woman for the sequel if Brett Ratner, accused of sexual misconduct, remained involved with the franchise.

News
By MattIsForReal - Nov 15, 2017 02:11 PM EST
Filed Under: Wonder Woman 1984
Wonder Woman star Gal Gadot has finally responded to reports that she wouldn't return for the sequel if Brett Ratner, who has been accused of sexual misconduct, remained involved with the franchise.

Warner Bros. has reportedly already broken ties with Ratner and his production company RatPac-Dune Entertainment, who co-financed the original, Gal Gadot has finally cleared the air herself.

Gadot weighed in on the entire situation on the TODAY Show, and confirmed herself that Ratner is no longer involved with the DC film franchise.

"The truth is, there's so many people involved in making this movie. It's not just me, and they all echoed the same sentiments. So everyone knew what the right thing to do, but there was nothing for me to say because it was already done before this article came out," Gadot said.


Warner Bros. recently shifted their calendar around and now Wonder Woman 2 is scheduled to release on November 1, 2019, avoiding direct competition with Disney and Lucasfilm's Star Wars: Episode IX.
James Gunn Reveals One Element Of WONDER WOMAN He Likely Won't Be Able To Adapt For The DCU
Related:

James Gunn Reveals One Element Of WONDER WOMAN He Likely Won't Be Able To Adapt For The DCU
Connie Nielsen Says It's Crazy That WONDER WOMAN 3 Is Not Moving Forward: I Hope They Change Their Minds
Recommended For You:

Connie Nielsen Says It's "Crazy" That WONDER WOMAN 3 Is Not Moving Forward: "I Hope They Change Their Minds"

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Do you have what it takes to write for us?
Want to contribute?
1 2
blvdnoise
blvdnoise - 11/15/2017, 2:44 PM
Girl Power...
RolandD
RolandD - 11/15/2017, 3:02 PM
@blvdnoise - Why does everyone say what I want to say before I can say it. Lol
ThePrettyNerd
ThePrettyNerd - 11/15/2017, 4:14 PM
@blvdnoise - Damn right!
Forthas
Forthas - 11/15/2017, 2:45 PM
This may have been just a rumor!
pitbull76
pitbull76 - 11/15/2017, 2:46 PM
[frick] the sleaze ball
L0RDbuckethead
L0RDbuckethead - 11/15/2017, 2:49 PM
Inb4 all the SJWs.
pitbull76
pitbull76 - 11/15/2017, 2:56 PM
@L0RDbuckethead - inb4 someone uses they same lame comment.
Griela
Griela - 11/15/2017, 2:53 PM
Brett Ratner is such a screw up. He went from directing Rush Hour to being a complete hack to being a complete scumbag.
GreypilgrimXXX
GreypilgrimXXX - 11/15/2017, 5:16 PM
@Griela - He was always a hack and you always a scumbag piece of shit, met his dumb ass some years ago and he was a major prick and his mother OHHHH HIS Mother, every [frick]ing word out her mouth is I am Ms.Ratner you know Brett Ratner's mother, he produces all the commercials for you guys.
Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 11/15/2017, 3:08 PM
@Griela - Point taken.
Griela
Griela - 11/15/2017, 3:11 PM
@Spock0Clock - Sorry, I didn't mean you. It's mostly Twitter.
Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 11/15/2017, 6:00 PM
@Griela - No need to apologize. It's all of us. That's the point.
Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 11/15/2017, 6:09 PM
For a long time, and especially in the internet age, the idea has been that open democratized discussion was a panacea. Lies would be exposed by the truth, as long as enough voices were heard.

But maybe (part of) the right response to misinformation (especially intentional misinformation) is individuals exercising a form of self-censorship. To withhold rumors and stories until they're well-founded, and not to just spout off and spread the initial misinformation, even as a means to understand it. Because we can't discuss lies without spreading them, and even the act of disproving them alters the conversation toward the framing of the lies anyway.

There's no easy answer to this, but it's clear there is a vulnerability exposed in that kind of openness. I'm going to have to chew on this...
Invasion96
Invasion96 - 11/15/2017, 3:29 PM
I READ THIS AS GAL GADOT IS NO LONGER APART OF THE SEQUEL AND MY HEART STOPPED
Invasion96
Invasion96 - 11/15/2017, 3:30 PM
What he said to Ellen Page was [frick]ed so I don’t care in the slightest about him
1 2
Related Headlines
Latest Headlines

Hot Headlines Hot Headlines

Sci-Fi & Fantasy

Anime & Manga

Gaming

Horror

Cartoons & Animated Features

Action Movies & TV

Pro Wrestling & MMA News
View Recorder