Empire Review X-Men: First Class What's their verdict?

Empire Review X-Men: First Class What's their verdict?

Know to be one of the most trusted and relaible sources for movie reveiws. Empire has published their take on FOX's X-Men: First Class. See what they had to say? Find out more...

Review Opinion
By DONNMARVEL - May 27, 2011 04:05 PM EST
Filed Under: X-Men: First Class
Source: www.empireonline.com

Here are a few excerpts from the 3* review by Empire's Dan Jolin. To read it in its entirety follow this link http://www.empireonline.com/reviews/reviewcomplete.asp?FID=136807

It is a strange world we live in where an X-Men movie without Wolverine turns out to be better than a Wolverine movie without X-Men. Although, that really says more about the awfulness of Fox’s first ‘Origins’ story (a spin-off with prequel DNA) than the brilliance of its latest (a prequel with mild retcon tendencies). Still, we should be heartened that, with the help of Brit genre-sharpeners Matthew Vaughn and Jane Goldman (who gleefully bruised the comic-book movie’s well-toned posterior with last year’s Kick-Ass), the X-franchise is back on the tracks laid 11 years ago by Bryan Singer. Even if they do only head towards the point where Singer first laid them.

Vaughn and Goldman prove a suitably bad influence on the franchise. This is easily the most brutal X-Men movie yet, pushing the rating to Dark Knight levels with some pretty raw violence. One superb sequence finds Jason Flemyng’s devilish teleporter Azazel revealing an especially nasty way of using his powers (think vertically).

The absence from the action of everyone’s favourite adamantium-clawed, cigar-gnawing semi-psycho isn’t too keenly felt, even given the more adult shadings. This is primarily because Fassbender’s Magneto more than capably fills the Wolvie-shaped hole.

In fact, nothing really lasts that long in X-Men: First Class, and that is its biggest weaknesses. It is so single-mindedly plot-driven that it whips along at too brisk a pace, rushing through scenes to an end point which feels too neat, too wrapped up, too contrived for a story which still has at least 40 years to go before we get to X-Men. It’s here that you really catch the scent of compromise, feel the pressures on the film-makers (also evidenced in a few too many disappointing FX moments — and don’t get us started on what they’ve done to Beast) to meet their release-date deadline.

A more steadily paced, character-driven story which focuses more on the Xavier/Lehnsherr relationship would have made for a much, much stronger entry in the X-canon. Who cares about all those kids with powers that are just slightly different variations on what we’ve seen in the series already, when you’ve got these guys in your movie?

Verdict
All you’d expect from an X-Men film (or spin-off, or prequel), but not all you’d hope for. It smacks of rush and compromise, but there’s thankfully enough to make you feel optimistic about the series’ future once more.

3 out of 5 stars

X-MEN: FIRST CLASS Was Partially Written In Claudia Schiffer's Hospital Room Due To Rushed Production
Related:

X-MEN: FIRST CLASS Was Partially Written In Claudia Schiffer's Hospital Room Due To Rushed Production

Matthew Vaughn Reveals Scrapped Plans For X-MEN: FIRST CLASS Trilogy And Who He Was Going To Cast As Wolverine
Recommended For You:

Matthew Vaughn Reveals Scrapped Plans For X-MEN: FIRST CLASS Trilogy And Who He Was Going To Cast As Wolverine

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 5/27/2011, 4:33 PM
3 out of 5 stars is pretty crap!

And I bet their not diehard X-Men fans too, guess we'll all know come June.

EMPIRES more a source I'd trust!

Cool find man!
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 5/28/2011, 6:10 AM
Empire are a mixed bag. If you read that review it's actually a 4 star write up, but they give 3 stars. Thor was a 3 star write up with 4 stars. Arse, elbow, arse, elbow..

Luis75
Luis75 - 5/28/2011, 6:41 AM
"It is a strange world we live in where an X-Men movie without Wolverine turns out to be better than a Wolverine movie without X-Men." I don't get it, Why is it strange?
DONNMARVEL
DONNMARVEL - 5/28/2011, 6:49 AM
Luis75@ i think they mean it's strange bcos wolverine is known to be the key element of the previous x men films but in a film by himself he does not flourish whereas a film without him does.

DONNMARVEL
DONNMARVEL - 5/28/2011, 6:52 AM
i have learnt not to take reviews to seriously as sometimes they ruin the film for me and at the end of the day it's just someone else's opinion.
dickmastaflex
dickmastaflex - 5/28/2011, 7:26 AM
sounds like a x film
dickmastaflex
dickmastaflex - 5/28/2011, 7:27 AM
all the fox advertising and clips made me a boycotter
you can clearly see by all the clips the fox influence
spiderneil
spiderneil - 5/28/2011, 7:33 AM
when empire gave;
SM2 - 4 out of 5 stars
IM - 4 out of 5 stars

but gave;
scott pilgrim 5 out of 5 stars
kickass 5 out 5 stars

I stopped buying the magazing because they clearly have no f***ing clue what they're talking about.
flames809
flames809 - 5/28/2011, 7:50 AM
spiderneil- they gave ironman 3/5
forthesakeofnow
forthesakeofnow - 5/28/2011, 8:06 AM
@spiderneil

Even though I wouldnt read trash like Empire or Total Film I think Scott Pilgrim and Kickass ARE better films than SM2 and Iron Man.
marvel72
marvel72 - 5/28/2011, 8:22 AM
this is empire star rating guide.

***** unmissable
**** excellent
*** good
** poor
* tragic

i said the film seemed rushed from the end of september 2010 - released june 2011.

just think when they started filming the amazing spider-man & when thats released.

they're still saying its a good film,just not excellent or unmissable as you lot want it to be.

@ teabag

comparing iron man to sex in the city both got 3 star reveiws,you really can't compare a film of one genre to another.

say for example the dark knight alot of people think thats the best cbm ever made which empire probably gave a 5 star reveiw.

so all other comic book movie will be measured against that & not a rom com.

also i do believe empire employs female reveiwers so they more than lightly got a young lady(the target audience)to reveiw sex & the city.
BigK1337
BigK1337 - 5/28/2011, 8:55 AM
Wow, the irony here. Everybody who favored this movie refuse to listen to this review, because it states the negatives of the movie and gave it low rating compare to all the others.

And they say us die hard fanboys are fickle about this movie. From what I read the movie is good and manage to revitalize the X-Men franshise; that doesn't mean it is immune to critism like it IS the "Greatest Comic Book Movie Ever Made".

It is obviously a rushed movie to begin with, due to how late it is filmed and how early it is to be realease. At least it delivered good movie for all you all to watch, just accept the criticism given in the movie. Just look at Thor; the movie is great, but still falls prey to negativity.
marvel72
marvel72 - 5/28/2011, 9:25 AM
@ theatonoshingcyclops

i also would only give the dark knight 3/5,i think its good but overrated.
MasterBlaster
MasterBlaster - 5/28/2011, 9:25 AM
Looks like this fucHer got his wittle feelings hurt by vaughns big bad meany movie. Oh how dare this movie be rated so naughtily!! Boohoo.

Somebody change this pussys diaper and get a real man to go and review this flick. I thought these reviews were supposed to b about the movie? Not insultive slights towards the guy who made it?
MasterBlaster
MasterBlaster - 5/28/2011, 9:34 AM
@Intruder

Look at you Bitch, jerking off to people's complaints. Lmao. Stupid FucH. Whatta weirdo.
XMEN2011
XMEN2011 - 5/28/2011, 9:44 AM
if Chris Hewitt wrote it it would have been better but he wrote the Article, however he works for Empire and he Loved it good enough for me
MasterBlaster
MasterBlaster - 5/28/2011, 10:21 AM
LOL.

ITS NOT UH TUMOR!!

Intruder, u dumbshit.
PoPcornDude
PoPcornDude - 5/28/2011, 11:09 AM
Wolverine is my least favorite hero, I always thought that Magneto can hold his own in any movie or comic besides Logan is being overexposed everywhere, so I'm glad that he's not the main guy here, I'll be watching !
:)
marvel72
marvel72 - 5/28/2011, 11:10 AM
@ teabag

so if they've got it wrong or right,i really couldn't care if its good or bad.

i don't think it'll be worth 3 stars,i think they're being more than fair.

if they had gave it 5 stars,you would be all singing there praises.
Deathlok
Deathlok - 5/28/2011, 11:35 AM
I won't pay money to see another X-film until one of the following happens...

A) Singer and Shuler-Donner are both absent from anything to do with the film whatsoever.

B) They reboot the franchise and start over with the original team.

Since we won't get B without A, it's really just if A happens.
capcyclopsftw
capcyclopsftw - 5/28/2011, 12:00 PM
Ha Tea! Is that a what the mother [frick] [frick]? Hahaha!
Soilworley
Soilworley - 5/28/2011, 12:03 PM
I saw the trailer before The Hangover Part 2 and it looks better than I originally anticipated.

Green Lantern looks awful. People at the theater were throwing things at the screen.
I lol'd.
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 5/28/2011, 12:27 PM
Be ashamed if your still defending this overrated yet another X-rush job!

Thank god we got THOR, GL & CAP this year... real cbm's!

JackDexx
JackDexx - 5/28/2011, 12:29 PM
@spiderneil
lol ur ass backwards comment was great to read.
spiderman2 and iron man are better then scott pilgrim and kick ass. fat chance
spiderman 2.... really.... one of the worst comic trilogies ever.
CherryBomb
CherryBomb - 5/28/2011, 12:41 PM

Reviews are subject.
People prefer action-driven movies, some prefer story-driven. It's almost impossible to find a balance.
BatmanDTW
BatmanDTW - 5/28/2011, 1:01 PM
@soilworley- quit making up dumb stories. no one thinks you're cool. you're just not a very good troll. x-men is the topic at hand, so talk about that.
marvel72
marvel72 - 5/28/2011, 2:49 PM
@ teabag

i'm definetly biased,but if all of marvel studios films got a 3 star rating,which is the rating for a good film in the eyes of empire.

i'd be pleased.

you supporters wanted the film to be excellent or unmissable,but it didn't get it.

just be grateful its still classed as a good film.

level1paladin
level1paladin - 5/28/2011, 2:56 PM
Glad to see some non-fanboy reviews coming out. When some of the sites that like Smallville also review a movie, well, that just ruins it for me.
marvel72
marvel72 - 5/28/2011, 3:26 PM
@ teabag

have you seen the troll chart,check out your postion.

@ theastonoshingcyclops

i wouldn't know a good film if i see one.

i gave the dark knight 3/5 star rating,if we check the empire film chart.

***** unmissable
**** excellent
*** good
** poor
* awful

so i think i do know a good film when i see it,just because i don't class the dark knight as a five star movie i'm an idiot.
1 2
View Recorder