THE BATMAN: New Rumor Claims To Set The Record Straight On Whether Robert Pattinson Will Be DCU's Dark Knight

THE BATMAN: New Rumor Claims To Set The Record Straight On Whether Robert Pattinson Will Be DCU's Dark Knight

Much has been said about the possibility of Robert Pattinson's Batman joining the DCU but a new rumour claims to set the record straight on whether The Batman star will fall under James Gunn's purview.

By JoshWilding - Feb 22, 2025 10:02 AM EST
Filed Under: The Batman

The prospect of Robert Pattinson's Batman becoming the DCU's Dark Knight continues to dominate fan discussions. If it were to happen, it would require a great deal of compromise on the parts of both James Gunn and Matt Reeves, though last month saw the former confirm the idea has been discussed within DC Studios.

There isn't necessarily anything in The Batman to stop it from retroactively becoming the first DCU movie, though how willing Pattinson is to potentially spend the next decade showing up in all manner of crossovers is hard to say. 

Ultimately, it doesn't seem overly realistic. Syncing up whatever we see in The Batman Part II with The Brave and the Bold, a story about the Caped Crusader training his son, Damian Wayne, as Robin, would be near-impossible without a significant time jump. Unless Andy Muschietti's movie is scrapped, of course. 

For what it's worth, following yesterday's rumoured DC Studios event for select press, scooper @MyTimeToShineH has chimed in to say, "Robert Pattinson is 100% not the DCU Batman. A new actor will take on that role."

This isn't overly surprising and with Reeves' sequel quickly taking shape, it's time for Gunn to get The Brave and the Bold where it needs to be...and cast one of the DCU's most important roles (possibly in time for next September's Clayface movie). 

Talking on the Golden Globes red carpet last month, The Batman director Matt Reeves was quizzed on Gunn's comments but didn't dismiss the notion of bringing his franchise into the DCU. 

"Sure, yeah, yeah, yeah. I mean, it really comes down to whether or not it makes sense," the filmmaker started. "What's been great is there was a story that I wanted to tell that we're calling The Epic Crime Saga which is the thrust of what we wanted to do. It's been important to me to be able to play that out. James and Peter have been really, really great about that and they're letting us do that."

"What the future brings, I can't really tell you," Reeves added. "I have no idea right now except that my head is down now about getting The Batman Part II shooting and to make it something special which is, of course, the most important thing."

Pushed on whether he thinks Pattinson's Bruce Wayne will eventually join the DCU, a flustered Reeves replied, "I don't know. We'll have to see where that goes." Both he and Gunn must be aware that fans want this to happen, so we'll have to wait and see what happens.

The Batman 2 will be released in theaters on October 1, 2027.

THE BATMAN Sequel Officially Listed As Untitled On Warner Bros. Website Under Sci-Fi/Fantasy Genre
Related:

THE BATMAN Sequel Officially Listed As "Untitled" On Warner Bros. Website Under Sci-Fi/Fantasy Genre

DOCTOR WHO Season 2 Trailer And Poster See Ncuti Gatwa Get Animated (Literally) With His New Companion
Recommended For You:

DOCTOR WHO Season 2 Trailer And Poster See Ncuti Gatwa Get Animated (Literally) With His New Companion

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
marvel72
marvel72 - 2/22/2025, 10:23 AM
Just keep him separate from the DC Studios reboot.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 2/22/2025, 10:41 AM
@marvel72 - keep the reboot separate from the reboot. And then keep that reboot separate from the other reboot. And then do a big multiverse thing with all of them in it, but keep that separate from the newest reboot. Then reboot that but don't include characters from the newest reboot. Rinse repeat. And lather, don't forget to lather. Really get up in those pits.
marvel72
marvel72 - 2/22/2025, 10:59 AM
@ObserverIO -

User Comment Image
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 2/22/2025, 11:04 AM
@marvel72 - I think I might have DC reboot fatigue. It'd be nice for them to just have one version that counts for once and stick to it until it's run it's course. THEN you have Bane's permission to reboot.
JustAWaffle
JustAWaffle - 2/22/2025, 11:38 AM
@marvel72 - Exactly. It doesn’t make sense to have him as the DCU Batman. The tone and feel already looks incompatible.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 2/22/2025, 11:58 AM
@JustAWaffle - And how do you feel about Charlie Cox being the MCU's Daredevil?
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 2/22/2025, 11:59 AM
@JustAWaffle - The fact is, Batman SHOULD be incompatible. That's why it works so well. That's why all these superhero universes work so well. The secret sauce of The Avengers is that it shouldn't work but it does. Same with the Justice League.
JustAWaffle
JustAWaffle - 2/22/2025, 1:39 PM
@ObserverIO - I think the MCU is diverse enough for that to fit, and it was loosely assumed to be connected in the Netflix series already.

But you make a good point. The DCU could have something similar. But the setting of The Batman seems pretty anti-supernatural so far.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 2/22/2025, 10:27 AM
We already knew that. Can someone banish MTTSH to the phantom zone already ? [frick]!
UncleHarm1
UncleHarm1 - 2/22/2025, 4:59 PM
@bobevanz - Breaking news: new rumor states Danny Devito will not be the new DCU Batman
Wahhvacado
Wahhvacado - 2/22/2025, 10:28 AM
User Comment Image
NonPlayerC
NonPlayerC - 2/22/2025, 10:50 AM
@ItsNotForMeWahh - they need to give the weekly reminder on this site. saw the article, knew what it was gonna say, I just couldn't help myself...
Malatrova15
Malatrova15 - 2/22/2025, 10:29 AM
He Will be in the movie ....such a rumor
DaHULK2000
DaHULK2000 - 2/22/2025, 10:32 AM
This is just them spinning there wheels..this movies not happening.
McMurdo
McMurdo - 2/22/2025, 3:14 PM
@DaHULK2000 - uh the DCU Batman is absolutely happening man. You don't have a DC cinematic universe without Batman.
DaHULK2000
DaHULK2000 - 2/22/2025, 4:53 PM
@McMurdo - oh..I was referring to the Matt Reeves Film.
UncleHarm1
UncleHarm1 - 2/22/2025, 5:02 PM
@DaHULK2000 - Unfortunately The Batman made good money, I feel like it's more a studio decision to keep pressing forward at this point. Gunn is probably not thrilled about it
Scarilian
Scarilian - 2/23/2025, 5:21 AM
@UncleHarm1 -
I feel the Batman was intended as a middle finger to the audiences honestly, a depressing deconstruction of the character by someone who dislikes the character - they insulted him for his race, his wealth, his role as Bruce and as Batman. I imagine if a sequel does get made it'd be more of the same deconstruction so perhaps they are worried about an audience drop-off as 'The Batman' does not hold up, especially on rewatches.

I don't think the Matt Reeves sequel happens either, remember that Reeves wants to do a trilogy. There's no way that they'll keep the franchise going alongside the rebooted DCU, it'd confuse audiences and conflict in regards to the marketing/toys/tone.

The normal plan for them to cancel popular projects that they announced is to delay them repeatedly until the audience kinda forgets and then they just quietly cancel plans for them. We've seen that happen with Blade, Armor Wars, The Runaways, Silver Surfer, The Incredible Hulk 2, The Warriors Three, etc...
Timerider
Timerider - 2/23/2025, 9:59 AM
@Scarilian - it would not confuse audiences, people are not dumb. Some fans want it to happen, and some fans don’t. I don’t think it will.
Scarilian
Scarilian - 2/23/2025, 10:56 AM
@Timerider -
There's general audience members who cannot tell what is Marvel and DC. Plus as a brand, DC has actively thrown confusion at people especially James Gunn, by picking and choosing what will be canon to his cinematic universe. The DC fanbase are already split between Snyderverse and hope for the Gunnverse - it'll be worse throwing the Reevesverse into the mix.

"people are not dumb"

The primary problem is more that they view a movie as just a movie, they'll watch a new superhero film and then probably won't think about it much past the day they saw it. They don't get invested into it as much as you or anyone else here.

If those seeing it are not familiar with the idea that the DCU is getting rebooted then you may think that Reeveverse Batman is meant to be a prequel to the Snyderverse Batman or the Gunnverse batman.

Especially when we are also dealing with a multiverse saga and the last main DC movie set-up the idea of multiple variations of Batman and that Flash's actions resulted in a new timeline.
UncleHarm1
UncleHarm1 - 2/23/2025, 12:17 PM
@Scarilian - Insulted him for his race??
Scarilian
Scarilian - 2/23/2025, 2:21 PM
@UncleHarm1 -
Selina's remarks throughout are intended to apply to Batman as the film is a deconstruction of Batman created by the same individuals who view Batman as a fascist or feel he is self-obsessed and can help society more if he gave away all his money and stopped being a vigilante/hero. It was created with that mindset.

The purpose of the scene below is that Selina wants Batman to help her, and Batman is being an a complete ass and refusing saying the person deserved to be kidnapped/die because they made poor choices. During her opening remarks she says "Whoever the hell you are, you obviously grew up rich". This is Selina and the writer laying the groundwork for how she'll convince Batman later.

00:44


The conclusion of the conversation has Catwoman says to Batman they need to stop these "White privileged assholes" (3:25) The line is intended to imply that Batman is also a "White Privileged Asshole" as Selina has correctly guessed that he grew up rich, has identified his race and is actively referring to him as an asshole due to him being an asshole in this conversation.



The movie as a whole spends a lot of time just insulting, belittling or portraying Batman as an unlikable character when you examine what he is actually doing and what is being said to him.

Selina wins this argument because Batman was acting out of character like an asshole so the writers could call Batman a "White Privileged Asshole".
Scarilian
Scarilian - 2/23/2025, 2:23 PM
She even directly states Bruce Wayne is one of the 'White Privileged Assholes'.
UncleHarm1
UncleHarm1 - 2/23/2025, 11:56 PM
@Scarilian - Bruce is white privelaged lol. He's literally the definition. He is rich because of generational wealth, something that historically white people have a heck of a lot more of than other people. And history has shown that most people don't use their granddaddy's money to fix all of their city's problems. So if he's gonna keep being Batman, by your own logic, the only thing to do is stop the other white privileged assholes from using their power for evil. It makes sense as a Batman movie, I don't get why it offends you so.
Scarilian
Scarilian - 2/24/2025, 7:04 PM
@UncleHarm1 -
It doesn't offend me, it's just immature and racist so it devalues the movie. It's why I won't watch the sequel, though chances are it'll never be made anyway.
UncleHarm1
UncleHarm1 - 2/24/2025, 7:17 PM
@Scarilian - User Comment Image
Scarilian
Scarilian - 2/28/2025, 1:13 PM
@UncleHarm1 -

Directing hatred at someone because of their race is racist. I'm not sure why you are trying to claim anything otherwise.
UncleHarm1
UncleHarm1 - 2/28/2025, 5:25 PM
@Scarilian - There is no hatred toward any race in a Batman movie lol. They do touch on the cultural and socioeconomic imbalances but so does the Simpsons. So do Roseanne reruns. That's quite the mountainous molehill ya got there.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 2/22/2025, 10:36 AM
Unless it comes from James Gunn himself, disregard anyone saying they're gonna set the record straight until at least after Superman.

I think it's obvious from the way both James Gunn and Matt Reeves have been speaking recently that the decision hasn't been made yet.

Wait. Be patient.
Nolanite
Nolanite - 2/22/2025, 10:54 AM
@ObserverIO - always telling the truth around here!

Stay slick brother
HulkisHoly
HulkisHoly - 2/22/2025, 1:49 PM
@ObserverIO -

Yeah. It’s obvious that the higher ups are going to see how Superman performs before making more decisions, which I don’t really like.

Good-creative decisions are good decisions regardless of just box office numbers.

Hulk, Thor, and Cap 1 didn’t kill at the box office but feige stuck with the plan and it all proved to pay off when avengers hit the screens.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 2/22/2025, 1:53 PM
@HulkisHoly - That was a pretty clever plan though. And you didn't have Jon Favreau wanting to keep Iron Man in it's own separate universe, Nor did we get a random second Iron Man.
McMurdo
McMurdo - 2/22/2025, 3:20 PM
@ObserverIO - I think Gunn made it obvious way long ago that Reeves universe was elseworlds, aka not connected to his DCU, and seemingly, some fans of Reeves' Batman film seemingly haven't been able to let go of a extremely small thread of hope (that they themselves have ushered into existence) that somehow Gunn is going to change his mind, change the entire story of his proposed DCU Batman and Bat Family, and allow Robert to be the guy.

Ya'll have been coping incredibly hard over this since day 1 and it's only going to make it more difficult to reconcile once you have to accept reality.
harryba11zack
harryba11zack - 2/22/2025, 10:36 AM
Pattinson will be middle aged by the second film even comes out. we need a younger more hip, more of a swagger fueled batman in order for disney to get the general audience back in the cinema, have the fight scenes edted like a tic tok vid, add some shitty rap music over the trailers and bring back the nipples.
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 2/22/2025, 12:19 PM
@harryba11zack - Sure... I mean, If Batman had anything at all to do with Disney.
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 2/22/2025, 10:39 AM
Set the record straight ? We've known the record for years now.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 2/22/2025, 10:43 AM
@TheJok3r - As of Creature Commandos the decision had not yet been made.
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 2/22/2025, 10:48 AM
@ObserverIO - Gunn literally said at least twice that it was made. The current director attached to the Brave and Bold also said it was made.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 2/22/2025, 10:52 AM
@TheJok3r - The director of the Flash movie is not James Gunn. We know that when Brave and the Bold was being developed it was to be a different Batman. That was then. That movie's been put on hold.

I don't remember James ever saying that they'd decided who the new Batman was gonna be. Why, who is it?
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 2/22/2025, 10:54 AM
@ObserverIO - Gunn said that Reeves wanted it separate and him and his team respected his wish.
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder