The Wizard of Oz Ruined Batman V Superman

The Wizard of Oz Ruined Batman V Superman

From all the core characters to some of the most poorly written moments - Batman v Superman is based on The Wizard of Oz.

Editorial Opinion
By UndeletedScenes - Apr 21, 2016 09:04 PM EST
Filed Under: Batman vs. Superman
Source: Undeleted Scenes

How The Wizard of Oz Ruined Batman v Superman

(Here is a breakdown in case you missed our video of this theory) 
 
Batman v Superman is The Wizard of Oz, excluding the manufactured confrontation between Bats and Supes.  What’s more, BvS’ worst scenes (the Martha moment and Superman’s death) came from The Wizard of Oz’s story line. 

The similarities between Superman and Dorothy go well beyond the red footwear.  The two are a pair of hayseed orphans raised by Kansas farmers.   Both fell from the stars to an alien world.  Both became responsible for confronting the evils of their new world.  Not to mention Dorothy’s greatest wish is to fly (albeit just over a rainbow).  
 
Of course the Superman-Dorothy similarities would exist in any one of his outings.  So it would be fair to assume Darkseid’s parademons aren’t flying monkeys, Lex’s use of a cheap timer wasn’t a nod to the witch’s hour glass, and Lex’s claim that Superman’s mother is witch was just odd and out of place writing.  However when the writers of any movie choose to include 3 overt references to another film right in the dialogue then they are inviting comparison.  
1.     Lex says Emerald City when he finds receives the kryptonite
2.     Perry White remarks that it’s like Clark clicks his heels 3 times and goes back to Kansas when he can’t find him
3.     Lex parodies the line Ding Dong the witch is dead at the end  
 
So we needn’t bother pretending the similarities could be accidental or that this is somehow a reach.  Clearly the writers tipped us off at what was coming.  And with that in mind, let’s jump straight into it.
Dorothy’s first and truest friend – and most fragile - is the scarecrow.  Superman’s scarecrow would have to be Lois Lane.  While Lois is by no means brainless, like the scarecrow she is guided almost entirely by emotion in her relationship with the protagonist.  This is especially clear near the end of the movie when she inserts herself in battles that she has no business being a part of. 
 
Next comes the heartless tin man.  There is no question that cold calculating Batman is this heartless friend.  Batman’s metal suit is just a doubling down of the point.
 
                                                                       

That leaves Wonder Woman to fill the role of the cowardly lion.  While she may seem a poor choice for a coward in a classic sense, like the lion she actively avoids confrontations despite her amazing strength and natural fighting prowess.
 
Taking MOS into account the order of introduction of the 4 core characters is the same in both the DC Cinematic Universe and in the Wizard of Oz.
 


Lex Luther is the man behind the curtain – figuratively and literally.  He is clearly the one pulling all the strings and engineering the conflicts from behind the curtain placed over Zod’s world engine.  

Martha Kent is Auntie Em.  Both farmers from Kansas are the parental figure the life of our orphan hero.  And it is Ma’ Kent’s link to Auntie Em that is responsible for the Martha moment between Batman and Superman.  

Zod is the Wicked Witches of the East.  Like Dorothy and the Wicked Witch, Superman and Zod come to the new world from the same place.  And like in The Wizard of Oz Zod’s death heralds Superman’s arrival in Oz (which is the world once it has the knowledge of Superman’s existence).

Doomsday is the Wicked Witch of the West, and while he is not quite Zod’s sister like in The Wizard of Oz, the two are pretty closely related.
 
If the similarities ended with just the characters then we could perhaps chalk this all up to chance and the use and reuse of natural archetypes that pop up in fiction.  But it doesn’t stop here.   
 
At the end of the second act of The Wizard of Oz, Dorothy, having travelled to the Emerald City, is denied access to the Wizard.  At this point all of her hope is lost and she laments that she’ll never get to see her dying Auntie Em again.  The wizard’s doorman hears this and has a complete change in heart because he, like Dorothy, had an Auntie Em once too.  
This is the origin for the low point of BvS - the Martha moment - where Batman, like the doorman has an incredible change of heart because he had a Mom Martha once too. And just like in The Wizard of Oz this critical moment occurs right at the end of the second act in Batman v Superman.  It was soft writing for 1939 kids movie.  It was much worse in the context of BvS.  
 
In the third act when Dorothy and her friends confront the Wicked Witch, it is the scarecrow’s life that is threatened when the witch lights him on fire. Dorothy races for a bucket of water to douse the flames and in so doing discovers the witch’s weakness when some of the water is accidentally splashed on the witch.  It is only by good fortune that Dorothy’s efforts to save the scarecrow that yielded this secret from the water.  
In BvS it is Lois Lane, our scarecrow, who was placed in mortal danger when Doomsday damages the building in which Lois is attempting to retrieve the kryptonite spear that she had nonchalantly discarded in some shallow water  (to setup a Wizard of Oz pay off).  Superman sensing Lois is in danger races to the water to save her, and it is in the water that he discovers the one thing that can defeat Doomsday, the spear.  So in both cases it is Dorothy/Superman’s efforts to save Lois/scarecrow from the witch/Doomsday that leads our protagonist to the water, and from the water comes the antagonist’s demise.
 
With the witch killed and Oz now safe Dorothy’s leaves her friends and the land of Oz.  This brings us right to Superman’s death, or his departure from Oz.  It was rushed.  In The Wizard of Oz we wanted Dorothy to leave.  In Batman v Superman it came from out of left field.  Superman’s death should have been the crescendo of the DC cinematic universe after years of setup, not an afterthought in the introductory film.  Why did he need to die? Batman and Wonder Woman were still in the fight against Doomsday.  It hadn’t even reached the point of lost-cause.  So why kill him off? Sadly, I am forced to conclude that it was just to match the story arc set by The Wizard of Oz.
 
I would be remiss if I didn’t point out one last similarity.  In the middle of the second act the witch tried to put Dorothy to sleep, only in BvS it wasn’t the witch but the director, and the target wasn’t Dorothy, but the audience. 
 
 
James Gunn Reveals His Title For A (Hypothetical) BATMAN And SUPERMAN Team-Up Movie
Related:

James Gunn Reveals His Title For A (Hypothetical) BATMAN And SUPERMAN Team-Up Movie

BATMAN: Ben Affleck's DCEU Appearances Ranked From Worst To Best According To Rotten Tomatoes
Recommended For You:

BATMAN: Ben Affleck's DCEU Appearances Ranked From Worst To Best According To Rotten Tomatoes

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

BlacktimusPrime
BlacktimusPrime - 4/21/2016, 10:15 PM
@Undeleted Scenes - Dex, old buddy, is that you? Either way, I was entertained.
UndeletedScenes
UndeletedScenes - 4/21/2016, 10:22 PM
@BlacktimusPrime - I am not Dex, and thanks either way.
CrappyNappy
CrappyNappy - 4/21/2016, 11:32 PM
@BlacktimusPrime - He's not Dexter. Trust me, if he was Dexter you wouldn't even need to ask.

"
DerekLake
DerekLake - 4/22/2016, 5:46 AM
@BlacktimusPrime - This is coherent. Dexter was not coherent.
Hulk94
Hulk94 - 4/22/2016, 12:32 AM
This was a great comparison and only lends credence to the fact that handing scripting duties to someone with no prior knowledge of these characters or their stories only leads to trouble, no matter the calibre of the writer himself/herself.
Atleast with the nolan batman movies, Jonathan Nolan has always been a self-professed comic-book fan and David S. Goyer....well, Goyer sucks, so I don't know how to defend him.
AwesomePromoz
AwesomePromoz - 4/24/2016, 4:53 AM
If this movie is based on Wizard of Oz, then all movies are.
UndeletedScenes
UndeletedScenes - 4/24/2016, 5:34 AM
@TheFamousJMC - Or you you made a claim with no support. Come on - the allusions are clearly there.
AwesomePromoz
AwesomePromoz - 4/24/2016, 8:45 AM
@UndeletedScenes - What in your analysis do you suspect to be the through line (protagonist's objective) of Wizard of Oz, and how does that relate directly to BVS-DOJ?

All you have done is make loose connections to the various members of the respective films' ensemble casts, and that is not a basis for the conclusion that one product is derived from the previous.
UndeletedScenes
UndeletedScenes - 4/24/2016, 10:07 AM
@TheFamousJMC - So did you read the article or just look at the pictures?
"If the similarities ended with just the characters then we could perhaps chalk this all up to chance and the use and reuse of natural archetypes that pop up in fiction. But it doesn’t stop here." Did you read past that?

Also I didn't just connect "various" cast members. I connected every core cast member in both films. Pointed out 3 direct references in to the Wizard of Oz in BVS. Identified 3 other subtle references. And explained the similarities between the end of Act 2 and all of Act 3 between the 2 movies.

I am not sure that I accept your premise that a movie can't be derived from another one if the protagonist's objectives aren't identical.
AwesomePromoz
AwesomePromoz - 4/24/2016, 11:36 AM
@UndeletedScenes - It's not derived from Wizard of Oz just because one of the many screenwriters in one particular draft put in a couple of references to one of the greatest films of all time, and they happened to make the final edit.

In what way do the plots of the films bear similarities?

What design influences do you see?

What particular shots were created as an homage to particular shots in Wizard of Oz?

You may think you've created an entertaining piece of editorial, and maybe you have, but I demand a better level of proof.
UndeletedScenes
UndeletedScenes - 4/25/2016, 10:38 AM
@TheFamousJMC - You demand a better level of proof? This is an editorial on a fan site. If I had proof it would be on the news tab. If you are looking for proof you'll have to talk to David Goyer.

There were 3 - not 2 - distinct and separate references to a movie that came out 77 years ago. And it wasn't a running joke or references to the same part either. That to me suggests the writers were pointing us in a direction. If it suggests nothing to you then so be it.

I don't have access to the movie in a way that I can compare shot for shot. One that Jack Carr from movie pilot pointed out the following:

"Later, in the fight with Doomsday, Snyder's camera captures a shot of Superman's red feet sticking out from beneath the memorial statue, right before they take the fight up into space — a clear nod to Dorothy's iconic red shoes. That's pretty cool."
AwesomePromoz
AwesomePromoz - 4/24/2016, 11:40 AM
An example of how I think you are skipping over the point and just reaching to fulfil your weak comparison.

The title of the movie is Batman VS Superman. The reasons for Batman's vendetta are clear, and serve well the driving through line of the movie.

In what way could Wizard of Oz be otherwise given the permutation or alternate title Tin Man VS Dorothy?

You cannot separate Batman VS Superman from entire cohesive fibre of the film. The comparison holds no water, you just gathered a bunch of cute coincidences.
UndeletedScenes
UndeletedScenes - 4/25/2016, 10:42 AM
@TheFamousJMC - I completely agree that this doesn't fit the mold. I acknowledged it in my write up. I think it would be a stretch though to call that a cohesive fiber of the film, as the film was not cohesive. And in the end the conflict was manufactured by Oz by withholding something from Dororthy. Also I don't understand how this confilct precludes the film from having significant allusions to the Wizard of Oz. (Alright I moved the goal post a little there - but you get my point).
AwesomePromoz
AwesomePromoz - 4/24/2016, 11:46 AM
I think even just the fact that there is a quartet of friends is an intrinsic design and thematic part of the iconography of Wizard of Oz. You need to have FOUR FRIENDS and Lois Lane does not fit with the iconic triumvirate of Batman, Superman and Wonder Woman. Not even a tiny little bit.
UndeletedScenes
UndeletedScenes - 4/25/2016, 10:48 AM
@TheFamousJMC - Couldn't agree more. What you said makes it even more odd when Doomsday is terrorizing the world and the 4 individuals who show up to fight him off includes Lois Lane.

Make no mistake - I am not saying it was well done, just that it was done. I think it explains the worst parts of the movie.

Fight that was already brewing was forced by the man behind the curtain.
Change in tide based on 2 characters having relatives with the same name.
Lois tossing the one thing that could kill the man she loves into shallow water for no reason.
Lois Lane showing up to fight Doomsday.
Superman's abrupt death.
AwesomePromoz
AwesomePromoz - 4/24/2016, 11:48 AM
And who is Toto?

Toto is as important a supporting character in Wizard of Oz as any of the others. He is a living symbol and reminder of Dorothy's connection to Kansas and the urgency of her return. You cannot take Toto out. So who is Clark Kent's faithful companion from Krypton?
UndeletedScenes
UndeletedScenes - 4/25/2016, 10:50 AM
@TheFamousJMC - Superman did have a dog in MOS, but it died when it was taking up by a cyclone. Hmmm, another "cute coincidence".
AwesomePromoz
AwesomePromoz - 4/26/2016, 4:23 AM
@UndeletedScenes - Actually didn't he murder his dad so he could save the dog? I guess the dog died of old age between films? What a waste of Kevin Costner lol.
UndeletedScenes
UndeletedScenes - 4/26/2016, 9:02 AM
@TheFamousJMC - It was a tragedy for all involved. So, that was my best effort - still unconvinced?
AwesomePromoz
AwesomePromoz - 4/26/2016, 9:20 AM
@UndeletedScenes - No, it's all good. But I'll be bored until you post another one!
UndeletedScenes
UndeletedScenes - 4/26/2016, 9:40 AM
@TheFamousJMC - Thanks, but you'll have to be content with the stupid cartoons I do. Admittedly I am out of my wheelhouse when it comes to movie theories.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6yrAwWg0CVJcG4_h2vyS-A
AwesomePromoz
AwesomePromoz - 4/26/2016, 10:06 AM
@UndeletedScenes - I like the cartoons. Do you have plans to be a pro animator?
UndeletedScenes
UndeletedScenes - 4/26/2016, 11:12 AM
@TheFamousJMC - Not really. I wouldn't mind if my youtube channel took off or something presented itself, but right now it is just a hobby - a very time consuming hobby. Glad you liked to the cartoons.
View Recorder