Tonytony comments on issues he has with marvel/disney fandom

Tonytony comments on issues he has with marvel/disney fandom

Tonytony comments on a couple of niggling things about Marvel fandom that is holding the genre back

Editorial Opinion
By tonytony - Mar 09, 2016 10:03 AM EST
Filed Under: DC Comics

THe issues i have with the current disney /marvel situation

1. They exploit and shape confirmation bias- 

Image result for manipulation


THis is one of my biggest issues with disney marvel. essentially disney tells people how to review their movies and not just their movies but also how to review movies they consider competition. How? well they perpetuate a narrative  that  creates a sentiment that shapes your perception before you see anything.
If you saw the anthony mackie interview at collider you would have been appalled

i attach the link here for you all 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yP6LkvXN5LY  

essentially its not just mackie there are many other parts of the mcu  (from actors and people in front of the camera) that displays consistent distatefulness like some sort of bully.

It causes two things, the first being that you if you go into the cinema being told something is wrong you are more likely to spend the time looking for whats wrong with the movie rather than simply appreciating what is in front of you and this then means if the movie is anything other than absolutely perfect(im talking empire strike back or dark knight level of perfection)  you can go "ah ha! thats what wrong with it" and overlook all the other good things.
 
Secondly if you are positive about the movie it makes it difficult to give it a high rating. Anyone who wondered how a movie like man of steel with A grade exit score scoring 56% on rotten tomatoes. Man of steel was not as divisive as many people say but some Disney trolls hijacked the conversation and really pushed against the movie. ANd it made that the accepted narrative and became self fulfilling 



A couple of things to note
  • Anyone who thinks it was a coincidence that the hitfix story dropped after the trailer of bvs is fooling themselves
  • anyone who thinks the smear bots on social media appearing about bvs has nothing to do with disney is fooling themselves
  • anyone who after seeing the circumstances in which disney got spiderman (from the sony hack) and watches all the nasty interviews so many different mcu guys give and acts like nothing is to do with them is fooling themselves.
  • You can expect the Disney trolls to start trying to attack this movie fairly early on, its being going on ever since man of steel was announced with all kinds of people attacking the movie before it was released
  • Anyone who thinks its an accident that the one negative (unsubstantiated ) commentary for hitfix has overshadowed all the positive feedback from more reputable  sources is fooling themselves. Disney and cohorts have made sure that all the positive reviews have been drowned out and simply decided to make the most of the one negative article (which could have been made up and has already been  debunked) rather than emphasising all the positive reviews from multiple and more reputable and verifiable sources. This is how you get a good movie being over critiqued.

 it makes me concerned about this studios methods and i think any responsible decent person would be too. After seeing the BVS  smear bots on twitter i was really staggered and i urge everyone here to google it.

I would urge all dc fans and do what fox fans did with deadpool to get ahead and don’t let the Disney trolls do to Batman v superman what they did to man of steel, that is create pressure that makes it hard to simply enjoy the movie.  Again I refer you to the Anthony Mackie interview for concrete proof of marvel trying to smear and attack the DCEU. 

The other thing that bugs me about Marvel cohorts is the hypocrisy

Image result for hypocrite

They are usually among the first to claim everyone copies them yet 
  • Marvel wouldnt make a movie with a female or black lead- the only reason they announced things is because dc announced it first, again if you think its a coincidence that marvel decided to suddenly announce movies about some minority groups after dc announced it you must be fooling yourself.
  • Dc announced the first versus movie in Batman v superman almost a year before civil war, where are the accusations of copying them then?
  • They constantly Bitch about changes anyone else makes to the characters yet will happily gloss over some abominations they make to characters like the mandarin, who got turned into a comedic buffon the mandarin wasnt a trick offering sexual favours.
  • Avengers movie will feature 68, no 69 characters, not a single complaint from any Disney troll about the film having lots going on, yet a movie like BVS with two and a half main characters (batman, superman and wonder woman cameoing).


Thats because the complaints are baseless and more about smearing or complaining about something.
 
 
I just want to get this off my chest as its something that truly bugs me about the current situation for fandom but I feel I need to mention this because the only way we can be consciously aware of what happens is by flagging it.
 
Quite frankly some of the smear and dirty tricks from Disney is not necessary,  they are in a good position but some of this stuff is going to bite them in the ass and lose them fans. Some of this like the smear bots towards BVS has been picked up by some parts of mainstream media, it just makes them seem like a bunch of insecure bullies.

I dont mind people doing things to help their movie but i absolutely hate seeing people try and attack others this is my main concern

Just my two cents let me know what you think below.

 

ABSOLUTE BATMAN #1 Puts An Unbelievable New Spin On Bruce Wayne's Origin And Supporting Cast - SPOILERS
Related:

ABSOLUTE BATMAN #1 Puts An Unbelievable New Spin On Bruce Wayne's Origin And Supporting Cast - SPOILERS

ABSOLUTE WONDER WOMAN First Look And Details Reveal That Diana Prince Is The World's First Public Superhero
Recommended For You:

ABSOLUTE WONDER WOMAN First Look And Details Reveal That Diana Prince Is The World's First Public Superhero

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
Matador
Matador - 3/9/2016, 12:23 PM
DC has a black lead in a movie? First time I hear of it does DC have any black heroes in the Justice League?

I know Marvel is ramping up Black Panther movie is that a black lead movie?

Besides that Marvel really doesn't have a female lead as powerful or iconic as Wonder Woman thus the non-lead female movie.

Just sayin.
RichardGrayson
RichardGrayson - 3/9/2016, 4:50 PM
@Matador - lol you are ignorant.

Will Smith is the lead character in Suicide Squad.... wtf are you talking about

and Cyborg is in the Justice League

Get educated breh
Matador
Matador - 3/9/2016, 8:06 PM
@RichardGrayson - Ok Major Dick Grayson you missed out on the whole conversation and responded to the first learn to read bra.

My question was pertaining to this from TonyTony Article:

- Marvel wouldn't make a movie with a female or black lead- the only reason they announced things is because dc announced it first, again if you think its a coincidence that marvel decided to suddenly announce movies about some minority groups after dc announced it you must be fooling yourself.

TonyTony response: technically you could say that a black lead is more like will smith in concussion, or say if you had a black person play thor in the thor movies for example, its not a supporting cast member. In movies where you have an ensamble its different but, the announcement of cyborg and wonder woman is pretty clear cut for dc.

Will Smith is a star but unless you've watched SS already for him to be the lead then it it would be Will Smith and his funky bunch. So what TonyTony is saying is his not the lead.

As for Cyborg he just a supporting character or the token black robot.
Matador
Matador - 3/9/2016, 12:33 PM
@tonytony - Well I thought a black lead is the main protagonist in the movie? Which I thought you were referring too.

Like Zedmore in Ghostbusters is he the lead or just a team member?
tonytony
tonytony - 3/9/2016, 12:43 PM
@Matador - technically you could say that a black lead is more like will smith in concussion, or say if you had a black person play thor in the thor movies for example, its not a supporting cast member. In movies where you have an ensamble its different but, the announcement of cyborg and wonder woman is pretty clear cut for dc.
Matador
Matador - 3/9/2016, 12:48 PM
@tonytony - But in there cases Cyborg and WW will be supporting role?
tonytony
tonytony - 3/9/2016, 12:32 PM
@matador @matador yeah they announced cyborg and that is a black lead also they announced wonder woman too.

Matador
Matador - 3/9/2016, 12:34 PM
@tonytony - But WW in her own movie IS the lead.
tonytony
tonytony - 3/9/2016, 12:45 PM
@Matador - i never said she wasnt in fact im saying its great that we are getting a movie with female lead and also a seperate movie with a black lead. You know what? just google the dc movie slate.
Matador
Matador - 3/9/2016, 12:46 PM
@tonytony - No that's not what I'm arguing about I know what's coming out.

What I'm asking you is what you consider is a lead in a movie?
tonytony
tonytony - 3/9/2016, 12:48 PM
@Matador - see my previous response
Matador
Matador - 3/9/2016, 12:49 PM
@tonytony - Did responded.
Superheromoviefan
Superheromoviefan - 3/9/2016, 1:13 PM
So, dc is virgin mary and marvel/disney is the devil who is trying to corrupt
#protectdcvirginty
RichardGrayson
RichardGrayson - 3/9/2016, 4:51 PM
@MrSuperheromoviefan - yes actually. DC is far superior
Ghostpointzero
Ghostpointzero - 3/9/2016, 1:47 PM
Yeah the Marvel fandom is annoying as shit but I've learn to just block and them and move on.

Some of the Marvel actors are dicks but again like you said it will come back to bite them in the ass one day.
Yaf
Yaf - 3/9/2016, 5:52 PM
@Ghostpointzero - Why block them? What they say [frick]ing hilarious sometimes.

However, this guy needs better grammar and I might read more than the comments.
Ghostpointzero
Ghostpointzero - 3/10/2016, 2:00 AM
@Yaf - It's no secret that this site in mostly a troll site. Even the staff mostly post click bait shit. I don't find what they say funny at all, I block them because they are annoying immature little shits. Hell it's the reason we got a block button in the first place to get rid of and avoid ignorant people on this site if we want to instead of dealing with them we can avoid them Altogether.
Batnut92
Batnut92 - 3/9/2016, 1:53 PM
Good god, the conspiracy theories you're spinning here is absolute bollocks.
Kyos
Kyos - 3/9/2016, 1:59 PM
I would urge all dc fans and do what fox fans did with deadpool to get ahead and don’t let the Disney trolls do to Batman v superman what they did to man of steel, that is create pressure that makes it hard to simply enjoy the movie.

I don't get this part. Do you want to say that the fact that an R-rated Deadpool movie made more money than a PG-13 Superman movie is primarily based on "Fox fans" (what are those anyways?) somehow being more effective in battling/ignoring "Disney trolls" when the latter try to "create pressure" to make it harder for people to "simply enjoy" a movie?
TucksFrom2015
TucksFrom2015 - 3/9/2016, 2:37 PM
#TriggerMeTimbers!

pesmerga44
pesmerga44 - 3/9/2016, 5:47 PM
@WeddingTux -
TucksFrom2015
TucksFrom2015 - 3/9/2016, 7:24 PM
@pesmerga44 - Marx debunked Confirmation Bias YEEARS AGO!!!!

kinghulk
kinghulk - 3/9/2016, 2:44 PM
i dont get why it matters dc announced wonder woman and cyborg first, there had been rumors for a very long time about a black panther and captain marvel film for phase 3. who cares either way we are getting a BP movie and a wonder woman movie (im naturally a little bit less excited for captain marvel and cyborg because they arent as cool characters imo but still excited)
BawbScharf
BawbScharf - 3/9/2016, 3:01 PM
This is the biggest problem with the D.C fan community as a whole: victimizing themselves and the brand they are loyal to.

When somebody doesn't like Man of Steel, they don't like the movie. Nobody is BULLYING Zach Snyder or the movie, they are giving their opinion. There are some qualities that rubbed people the wrong way; EXACT qualities that can be pinpointed. It isn't vague like the claim that all Marvel movies are comedies without any really evidence as to why this is. A lot of people, most just casual movie goers who have no stake one way or another (Brad Jones, Doug Walker, etc. ...who are the most casual of casual fans that they don't know what Marvel does or doesn't own.), just didn't like the movie. That doesn't constitute bullying. IF it was, I could state that anything is bullying. I could say that this whole article was bully behavior to Marvel fans ...but that would be petty and,oh yeah, absolutely crazy reasoning.

When there are bots spreading hate towards B V S, that isn't some massive conspiracy against the WB. It is some silly Marvel troll having no time on his hands. Here is what people who make this "smear campaign" argument don't get: both sides have petty assholes. It is no different than atheism and the christians. One person does one thing, and the other side points there finger at the group as the whole to say "SEE! THEY ARE ALL LIKE THAT."

Let us, be realistic here for moment ...why would Disney need to do something so petty? The answer is they don't. They own the [frick]ing world right now. Do they care about competition? Yes. Enough to stoop to internet troll levels? Absolutely not. I worked for the Disney corporation for five years and have come back with one truth: they let their fandom do the dirty work for them. They never needed to worry about something below the corporate level of things, because their devout fans of their product will do the promoting and fighting for them. This sort of internet warfare is below them as a corporation. The name of the game with them has always been "provide the world with a quality product with as much money and imagination as possible ...and the people will do the rest." They fight their opponents head on in facts, figures, and ideas, not petty internet flame wars. It makes no sense for the most powerful company in the world to behave that way.

With Anthony Mackie, you are focusing on ONE aspect of his interviews that supports your opinion ...and ignoring that he is just an obnoxious ass in general. I think he is a great actor, but there has been numerous reports of him being something of a child. Remember, there was a time when he would call the Marvel offices non-stop to to campaign to in Age of Ultron when that movie was still in development. Disney didn't ask him to say that shit, he didn't on his own because he is a grown up child. Notice, the BIG stars do not pick these fights because they are business men and women; they get that. You would think, if there was this mass conspiracy, that the big D would want the people with the most influence saying this crap. It would Evans, Feige, RDJ, Johansson saying this stuff, and not Sebastian Stan and Mackie. The former are brand names who are exclusively tied to the Marvel name and big name actors/incredibly influential figures in the media, while the latter are two supporting/character actors in holiday. Nobody associates them with the brand.

What you are doing is petty in its own right and it is a sad group think that the D.C community does as whole ...and I have no idea why they think it works. I am going to use two examples here, the first is personal and the second is another group of people that have been using the same tactic.

Okay, so first the personal. My mom is a hot mess of a human being. She is always in trouble and it is NEVER her fault. She loses her job, it is never because she straight up insults her boss to her face, it is because her boss could not handle criticism. If she doesn't get a job, it isn't because she wouldn't stop talking about how much money she was going to get paid when CONSTANTLY asked not to, it is because they were a company who didn't know what they were doing. Why was she a horrible parent who never had food in the house, rent, or money that kept the power on, but somehow always had money to go the movies and buy herself new clothes? Because my dad was a terrible husband to her. It was NEVER anything she was doing wrong, but she was a mess because the way somebody else. She took NO RESPONSIBILITY for the things she didn't do right and instead said it was the rest of the world's problem. Do you not see a little correlation here to the way she behaves and the way people act when it comes to something like M.O.S. Instead of looking at some of the things the movie did wrong, it is the critics and the Marvel-nati not getting it or this massive conspiracy against YOU. You are playing D.C off as some kind of victim, passing the blame to everyone else, and not looking internally as to maybe what the company might not have been doing right.

How do we know the difference? The same reason I know that my mom is wrong when she says that finding a job is impossible: the side of the victim never points out ANY of their own flaws. D.C is perfect and everyone else is just picking on them. No property is ever perfect. Marvel certainly isn't. It is never "Yes, the destruction of Metropolis might have been over the top." There is never admitting ANY flaw or blame and just trying to present things in black and white terms. That is my biggest tell of someone playing the victim card, because I have dealt with it my whole damn life.

Now, for a more universal example: the Republican party over the last few years, ESPECIALLY when Obama was put in office. So ...when Bush was in Office, there was a huge outcry against him because what he was doing in office. There was EVERY reason to criticize him because we, as a country, were doing things we were not supposed to be doing, wasting our budget doing it. When Obama gets put in office, the Republicans had this wild idea that they were allowed an equal right ...EVEN THOUGH OBAMA HAD ONLY BEEN PRESIDENT FOR A MONTH. Because people were outraged over their president, they believe they had the same right to be outraged over a guy who wasn't a President long enough to make any kind of executive decision. It was immediately "He is the worst and he is the reason we are all broke" even though, if you had any kind of deductive reasoning, there was no way that was possible. Logic didn't matter to them. Instead, the Democrats (and most of America) ripped their guy, thus it was okay to rip this new guy ...because, in their mind, just saying something meant it was the truth. This is what many on the D.C camp does. They believe that they are entitled to equal representation even though there is no reason to grant them it YET; there has been no good will earned between D.C and the casual audience. Like Republicans, they think stating ANYTHING about Marvel automatically makes it true. Something like Marvel movies are only targeted towards children is used almost as "Obama-Care is going to destroy our capitolist society" was YEARS ago. There was no real evidence to either, other than personal agendas that protected the accusers best interest.

My suggestion: chill the [frick] out. BVS is going to make bank. You are going to enjoy it. It is DEFINITELY going to open the door to the DCEU. It doesn't matter what Marvel does, because you are going to love this movie. Shouldn't that be what matters? Not some plea to explain why the rest of the world who doesn't agree with you is wrong and why you are right?
TitanicByMyself
TitanicByMyself - 3/9/2016, 3:41 PM
@Objectivelybiased - I see your point but it's extremely ignorant to just group DC fans into one group like that. A lot of them do have victim mentalities no doubt but you make it seem like every single DC fan is that way. There are plenty of marvel fans that are loyal to the MCU and have the same mentality that you describe. I mean just go to any Civil War article and say you aren't excited. I've been here long enough to know that they will rip you a new one there. Same for DC articles. It goes both ways.
chriskrispy
chriskrispy - 3/13/2016, 3:41 AM
@TitanicByMyself - it seems theres a huge difference between dc fans and dc trolls. I enjoyed MoS to an extent and I'm hopeful for BvS, yet I still prefer the output of the MCU so far. However because I like the MCU I'm sure some DC troll would tell me I'm either wrong, a kid, a pussy, an idiot, or possibly even mentally retarded, as opposed to having an intellectual conversation. Unfortunately it seems there's many more DC trolls than casual fans.
TitanicByMyself
TitanicByMyself - 3/13/2016, 6:16 AM
@chriskrispy - you're right. Especially seeing how WB is just not making one connected universe. They're basically unproven.
WYLEEJAY
WYLEEJAY - 3/9/2016, 5:07 PM
Holy crap man. Your obsession with hating Marvel Studios and their fans is bordering on unhealthy. Jeebus let it go. Your worse than them with this stuff. Been hearing you cry about this for years and where has it gotten you?
DallasAvenger
DallasAvenger - 3/9/2016, 5:07 PM
Ha ha ha. Delusional DCEU Only Fans. You're cinematic universe doesn't exist yet! Pretty easy to throw stones at Marvel movies when you don't even have a house. Yes MoS got low critical scores because of Marvel fans. Such a great smear campaign. Weird how a giant corporation like Time Warner, one of the big six that controls all media, is a underdog in your minds and can't figure out a way to outsmart a couple of über fans online. Or maybe it has character and story problems like the other Snyder which got it grades like the other Snyder movies...
1 2
View Recorder