Andrew Garfield & Emma Stone Kissing In A Deleted Scene From THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN

that pic really looks a lot like Bella and Edward from twlight he even has the Edward hair as well. Not saying they're the same that pic just looks very alike to me.

@knight yes you are the first one to think that.

DID THEY GET DOWN AFTER.

How many deleted scenes this movie have?! I guess I will find out Nov. 9th

By the way, how pointless was that one scene of Peter and Gwen web-swinging for five seconds?

Wow... That was worth leaving on the editing room floor.

Yea youre right Peter wa irresponsible and self centered in this movie becasue he did recieve the famous " great power" speech till the end( well something in the vein of it) and the whole movie fleshed out the Peter Parker character and everyone around him and he wasn't truly spiderman till he learned his lesson at the end. The whole point of this movie was to set up the character of Peter Parker and illustrate how he develops. In the Sam raimi films( the first one) Peter became the perfect, good, hero right after his uncle Ben died and he got the killer. There was no in between development he just became spiderman. Well in TASM he learned from mistakes and learned the need to be responsible and put himself before others( the eggs at the end). But him breaking cap Stacy's promise is the perfect device used to further deepen peters responsiblity( the breaking of the promise foreshadows Gwen's death)

that was not a scene ... that was a snipet of a scene .... I WANT THE SCENE NOW!!!

CaptainObvious,

Yep, its obvious, you're 101% correct about Peter. Not only was he totally unlikeable in TASM but he also, obviously, bore no ressemblance to the Peter Parker of the comic book. So wrong in far far too many ways to list.

The original Peter Parker WAS a social outcast and was pretty much doted on by Uncle Ben and Aunt May, and he was NEVER completely rebellious towards them as they WERE his world outside of his love of science (seeing that in the TASM movie slightly sickened me with the utter disrespect he showed time and again until Uncle Ben was shot - and he was still pretty much a tool to Aunt May sometimes even after that event)... the original Peter Parker was picked upon/bullied, and rarely had any friends. He couldn't relate to most people even though he was smart and a teacher's model student. The transition in Raimi's Parker from zero to hero was more felt than Garfield's transition which wasn't much. As wooden as some people thought Tobey was, the story made the transition more believable as well as for him being a total socially retarded dork - the kind bullies pick on and shoved inside hallway lockers.

TASM was just Twilight watered down and covered up in a Spider-Man dressing. The only persons who I thought was believable was Curt Conners as a good scientist gone loco and Captain Stacey (he was doing exactly what the comic book Captain Stacey would do as a good cop and a father) - hell, even Sally Field as Aunt May did a passable run in her role as the doting and concerned Aunt like in the comics. They just changed Peter and Gwen too much from their original comic book counterparts.

...and for a first part of a new trilogy, THEY STILL HAD HIM UNMASKING EVERY SO OFTEN!

@Spidey31 - So that version of Peter Parker needs to have 3 people close to him to die before he actually learns something about responsibilities? 3 [frick]ing deaths before he finally gets his shit together? Seriously, that's you call great character development? Uncle Ben dies, he never once question himself, and doesn't get it. Cap Stacy dies after choosing to believe in him, fighting alongside him and understanding what Spider-Man is all about. Tragic heroic death, inspiring speech... This is followed by the last message Uncle Ben sent him via voicemail before he died. Another inspiring speech. And after all that... Peter still doesn't get it, still didn't learn a GODDAMN THING! How is that some great character development?

its funny that andrew said this was his favoruite scene, and i like it, its a good scene

Oh yeah it's great character development becasue he LEARNS @ kingdork no offense but your comment doesn't really make sense becasue you're just stating what he has to go through to learn his lesson yet that's the whole purpose of character development, it's developing the character.

i loved this movie so much

@Spidey31 - I think we'll have to disagree on this. I still think a movie should work on its own and shouldn't depend on its sequel to come. Here we have a character that doesn't grow into anything else, and hasn't solved the issue of his moral and psychological weaknesses (which what good character development tends to do). He didn't grow into anything else. He listened to the speech but reverted to his former selfish self at the very end. And on a fanboy side, even despite Andrew Garfield's delightful performance (I gotta hand it to the guy) this isn't the Peter Parker I grew to know and love.