First Official Reviews For THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN Hit

First Official Reviews For THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN Hit

We have seen a few false/iffy reviews and early Twitter reactions, but here are the first official verdicts on Marc Webb's The Amazing Spider-Man off the heels of its premiere in London last night..

By MarkCassidy - Jun 19, 2012 04:06 AM EST
Filed Under: Spider-Man
Source: Various

I guess some embargo has been lifted somewhere, as the very first (official) reviews for The Amazing Spider-Man have appeared. So far early Twitter reactions to the premiere in London last night have been positive, but by no means overwhelmingly so. The general consensus seemed to be that while all of the performances were spot on, the movie fell a bit flat in some other areas, and that seems to be reflected in Empire's 3 star review which you can read some excerpts from below..



..It takes the high school bit of Raimi’s flick, expands it to three acts, then sutures in a scientist/green alter-ego thread, this time in the shape of Rhys Ifans’ Curt Connors/The Lizard. The result is a mixed bag, beset by muddy plotting and decent (not jaw-dropping) action set-pieces but enlivened by a focus on people and strong performances, especially from Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone.

This is solid rather than spectacular blockbuster filmmaking. When Parker finally suits up, we get a return to the irreverent wisecracking of Stan Lee and Steve Ditko absent from Raimi: this is your sarcastic, neighbourhood Spider-Man (“Oooh, my weakness is small knives”), nonchalantly sneezing webbing to apprehend villains or beating up street hoods — to use Andy Townsend parlance — for fun.

Graced with great performances from Garfield and Stone, The Amazing Spider-Man is a rare comic-book flick that is better at examining relationships than superheroism. If it doesn’t approach the current benchmark of Avengers Assemble, it still delivers a different enough, enjoyable origin story to live comfortably alongside the Raimi era.


Of course this is only one review, more are now beginning to appear. Total Film award the movie 4 stars, and in summing up say - "It isn’t perfect but this reboot’s wins outweigh its wobbles. The leads charm, the action crackles and the grooves are well-laid for part two. Untold story? Next time, then.".

Similarly, The Guardian Writes - "Marc Webb's successful synthesis of action and emotion, together with a terrific performance by Andrew Garfield, means that this Spider-Man is as enjoyable as it is impressive".

The Telegraph writes - While Raimi got fanboys drooling with Kirsten Dunst in a rain-soaked vest top, Webb’s leading lady remains clothed and dry. Instead, the camera ogles Garfield, whose enviable glutes are showcased quite magnificently in his skin-tight bodysuit. Raimi’s films were for the teenage boys who used to dress up in Spider-Man pyjamas; Webb’s is for girls whose other halves may soon be dressing up in Spider-Man pyjamas for their benefit.

Pretty positive overall then, if not quite the enthusiastic response many were hoping for. Of course the only reviews that matters come from CBM, and you can check out what our own Josh Wilding has to say about The Amazing Spider-Man a little later on.









RUMOR: Marvel Studios Could Return To Plan For Street-Level DAREDEVIL Crossover With SPIDER-MAN 5
Related:

RUMOR: Marvel Studios Could Return To Plan For Street-Level DAREDEVIL Crossover With SPIDER-MAN 5

SPIDER-MAN 4 Is Reportedly Being Described By Insiders As The Wall-Crawler's Biggest Movie Yet
Recommended For You:

SPIDER-MAN 4 Is Reportedly Being Described By Insiders As The Wall-Crawler's "Biggest" Movie Yet

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4 5 6
AmazingFantasy
AmazingFantasy - 6/19/2012, 4:42 AM
Verdict
Graced with great performances from Garfield and Stone, The Amazing Spider-Man is a rare comic-book flick that is better at examining relationships than superheroism. If it doesn’t approach the current benchmark of Avengers Assemble, it still delivers a different enough, enjoyable origin story to live comfortably alongside the Raimi era.


Reviewed by Ian Freer
From here:http://www.empireonline.com/reviews/review.asp?FID=135132

You didn't get the right one my friend.
Thank me later :)

As for the review:


GIFSoup

CANT WAIT FOR THIS OR TDKR.
ModernAvenger89
ModernAvenger89 - 6/19/2012, 4:46 AM
Guardian gave it four, so did Total Film. But The Guardian have a few reviewers. I remember Avengers getting and 3 stars by one guy and 4 by another.
AmazingFantasy
AmazingFantasy - 6/19/2012, 4:48 AM
They were many others review sites such as:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/9340774/The-Amazing-Spider-Man-the-first-review.html

and the RT review gave it a 4/5:

The Avengers fans have enough heroes already. What a thrill to see one fighting for another cause.
June 19, 2012

-Robbie Collin
Daily Telegraph

and others who gave it a 4/5.

We have a good flick on out hands.

DukeAcureds
DukeAcureds - 6/19/2012, 4:54 AM
I didn't like it.
I thought Gobby looked like a damned Power Ranger and the relationship between Parker and MJ (bad casting for MJ) was strained and sickly.
Why are they re-releasing this piece of shit?
TheOther
TheOther - 6/19/2012, 4:57 AM
@Duke what the hell are you talking about? haha
VIKEME
VIKEME - 6/19/2012, 5:00 AM
I've kind of had a softball in my stomach for the past few days when I think about TASM. The early, early twitter buzz was all over the place. Now that we know the majority of reviews will be positive, that's good enough for me. I don't need it to be the best CBM of the decade or anything. Just knowing this is a solid building block for the future of the franchise is good enough for me.

I even read a review a little while ago that thought Andrew Garfield delivered the single best performance in a CBM since Heath Ledger. He said ultimately the film had very high highs and a few downers that kept it from being truly great but was still a very good movie.

Imax 3D, midnight showing. Can't wait!
DukeAcureds
DukeAcureds - 6/19/2012, 5:08 AM
Oh yeah. New version. Well, now that's something else. Alright!
AmazingFantasy
AmazingFantasy - 6/19/2012, 5:19 AM
@Spidey23- Im gonna get a blowie after this film then :P
MetropolisMarvel
MetropolisMarvel - 6/19/2012, 5:20 AM
Superman Returns was a chick flick, too.

I blame Twilight.
iJackSparrow
iJackSparrow - 6/19/2012, 5:26 AM
Hey Mark, I've been working my ass off trying to post my article, but I posted later than you and others because I was taking my time making the article more clean. Could you look at mine and reunite what I've posted with your or something?

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/MarvelMovieverseNews/news/?a=61986
AmazingFantasy
AmazingFantasy - 6/19/2012, 5:27 AM
Overall-Positive and great movie.

No but as one user said here , it will suck because hes suit sucks....

Can the users of ComicBookMovie please ban keyboard warriors because frankly there pathetic...unless we ignore and laugh at them :)
Ill take the latter.
Superheromoviefan
Superheromoviefan - 6/19/2012, 5:30 AM
Good enough for me
AmazingFantasy
AmazingFantasy - 6/19/2012, 5:31 AM
From RT so far its this:


AmazingFantasy
AmazingFantasy - 6/19/2012, 5:32 AM
Im happy to contribute to this article @RorMarchine, from the looks of it @IJack aswell.
RidiculousFanBoyDemands
RidiculousFanBoyDemands - 6/19/2012, 5:33 AM
I think when it is all said and done it will be around 85% like Batman Begins. I'm really looking forward to this.
AC1
AC1 - 6/19/2012, 5:34 AM
I agree with Empire most of the time, but they've been known to make mistakes here and there - everyone's already mentioned their Green Lantern review, and they also said The Grey barely had anything to do with wolves, and they gave Haywire a four star review, when it's clearly more of a three star film.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 6/19/2012, 5:35 AM
iJackSparrow, sorry dude, doesn't really work that way! But you do have some reviews in your article that I don't quote here, so what I can do is post a link to them in this one?
Minotauro
Minotauro - 6/19/2012, 5:40 AM
So the movie is getting some mild reviews. Or so it will eventually.
wyokid
wyokid - 6/19/2012, 5:43 AM
Lots of people comparing it to Twilight. Best case scenario this film bombs and Sony finds the franchise dead and sell it back to Marvel! :)
iJackSparrow
iJackSparrow - 6/19/2012, 5:44 AM
@RorMachine

That's what is my idea, you could get the best parts of our article and use it on your article. It's for Spidey and for the Spider-Fans, I don't care about who deliver the news. What amazing morning this is for comic book fans, man. :D
Minotauro
Minotauro - 6/19/2012, 5:45 AM
@wyokid - I don't it should bomb, but I hope it isn't successful enough to make more. I'm more of a Raimi guy. We'll see if Mark can change that.
ralfinader
ralfinader - 6/19/2012, 5:46 AM
That sounds a little discouraging, compared to the over-whelming praise Avengers recieved. I'll wait to read some more reviews, but the synopsis from the one above didn't ring my bell.
iJackSparrow
iJackSparrow - 6/19/2012, 5:46 AM
@Minotauro Mild reviews? From [frick]ing Empire? The one that gives everything Warner at least a 4 and gave SUPERMAN RETURNS a 5/5? LOLOLOLOLOLOL. Reviews are looking AMAZING so far, mate.
moviesrawesome
moviesrawesome - 6/19/2012, 5:47 AM
I don't know. Really looking forward to this one but the Telegraph makes it sound like Spidey just got 'Twilighted'.
AmazingFantasy
AmazingFantasy - 6/19/2012, 5:48 AM
inb4 Twilight comparisons.
iJackSparrow
iJackSparrow - 6/19/2012, 5:50 AM
I've been saying for quite sometime that this film would rock the face of the Earth. So glad to see all these glowing reviews pouring in. I'm ready for July, 3rd!!!!
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 6/19/2012, 5:51 AM
Sorry but although it is getting a majority of 4 star reviews, the actual content of them is NOT reflecting that. Every one of them points out the same flaws but says the movie succeeds despite them. Great, but not what I was hoping for. This reboot needed to be ..well, amazing to justify its existence and I'm not getting that impression. Course it doesn't really matter anyway, we won't know until we see for ourselves, I'm just saying I'm slightly disappointed with the reception.
thingrock4
thingrock4 - 6/19/2012, 5:51 AM
CAN'T WAIT!!!!
iJackSparrow
iJackSparrow - 6/19/2012, 5:51 AM
@moviesrawesome

I've been chatting with the reviewer this morning, what he is trying to say is that GIRLS are also a demographic for this film, like I've been saying here for quite some time. That's what he meant, there's nothing of Twilight on this film, except that will appeal to girls, even more than The Avengers did.
Minotauro
Minotauro - 6/19/2012, 5:52 AM
@ijacksparrow - Will see. will see. @ralfinader said it best. ;)
iJackSparrow
iJackSparrow - 6/19/2012, 5:53 AM
@RorMachine

LOL. Okay, let's do a revisionist history here. Rotten Tomatoes will tell this story if you don't, mate. The reviews are glowing at this point. Saying anything else is denial at this point. But suit yourself. ;)
AmazingFantasy
AmazingFantasy - 6/19/2012, 5:53 AM
@iJackSparrow-

>Take a girl to see this film
> Get laid.

Has this become the new "Twilight scam" for guys, see a CBM to get laid?

Im in :)
iJackSparrow
iJackSparrow - 6/19/2012, 5:56 AM
@THEGODDAMNDEADPOOL

The funny thing is, I'm dead serious about this. My ex-girlfriend "asked me out" to see The Amazing Spider-Man last Friday. Like I wouldn't go, but yeah, I'm getting laid because of Spider-Man. Literally.
wyokid
wyokid - 6/19/2012, 5:59 AM
Glowing? No. All I'm seeing is "meh, it was okay".
AmazingFantasy
AmazingFantasy - 6/19/2012, 6:00 AM
@iJackSparrow- You lucky bastard. Getting laid and seeing the greatest film of the year for you!

I cant wait for this either, ill just get a blowie :)
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 6/19/2012, 6:02 AM
Don't get me wrong, I'm glad to see it didn't get a pasting! (honestly I was almost expecting one) but those reviews are NOT glowing. They are "pretty good". Avengers reviews were glowing.
RidiculousFanBoyDemands
RidiculousFanBoyDemands - 6/19/2012, 6:03 AM
Yeah, I wouldn't call any of these reviews glowing either. They aren't horrible by any stretch of the imagination, but let's not kid ourselves. Nobody is gushing over this film like they were with The Avengers. Still an opening day watch for me regardless if it gets positive or negative reviews.
Minotauro
Minotauro - 6/19/2012, 6:05 AM
@Rormachine & RFBD

+1
ralfinader
ralfinader - 6/19/2012, 6:07 AM
RorMachine - 6/19/2012, 5:51 AM
Sorry but although it is getting a majority of 4 star reviews, the actual content of them is NOT reflecting that. Every one of them points out the same flaws but says the movie succeeds despite them. Great, but not what I was hoping for. This reboot needed to be ..well, amazing to justify its existence and I'm not getting that impression. Course it doesn't really matter anyway, we won't know until we see for ourselves, I'm just saying I'm slightly disappointed with the reception.

Yeah, I'm in agreement that the reviewers and tweeters should be falling over each other to justify this reboot. I am also not liking the way sthe reviewers are describing the basic layout of the movie. I'll still see this the weekend after the 4th, to judge for myself.
SS2894
SS2894 - 6/19/2012, 6:09 AM
I just hope the fight scenes scenes are great, that is something that I still enjoy from the Raimi trilogy over other superhero movies. CBM fight scenes just felt underwhelming or rushed after 2007(with the exception of The Incredible Hulk).





1 2 3 4 5 6
View Recorder