THUNDERBOLTS* Director Explains Decision To Reveal NEW AVENGERS Rebrand So Soon After Movie's Release

THUNDERBOLTS* Director Explains Decision To Reveal NEW AVENGERS Rebrand So Soon After Movie's Release

Thunderbolts* director Jake Schreier has addressed Marvel Studios' decision to reveal that the asterisk in the movie's title refers to The New Avengers so soon after the film was released...

By MarkCassidy - May 05, 2025 10:05 PM EST
Filed Under: Thunderbolts

The big reveal that the asterisk that was added to the Thunderbolts* title shortly after the release of the first trailer referred to "The New Avengers" probably didn't come as a shock to many here on CBM, but it would have been a surprise for general audiences who haven't been keeping up with rumors relating to the movie.

For this reason, the decision to officially rebrand the movie as The New Avengers just three days after its theatrical release was seen as a bit of a head-scratcher.

Some believe the marketing campaign kicked off a little earlier than planned when the opening weekend box office numbers came in, but it sounds like it was always set to begin shortly after the movie hit the big screen.

“It felt like, if Val is also trying to pull a switcheroo and sell the New Avengers to the world, we could do that, too,” director Jake Schreier explains to The New York Times. “Especially given that the asterisk has been on the movie for a year, hopefully it doesn’t feel sweaty — it feels like this was a plan and we built up to it.”

“It’s very fun [Marvel was]open to embracing that,” the filmmaker added. “It’s so interesting in this world, and Kevin [Feige] talks about it sometimes, where sometimes they wanted things to leak and they don’t. I think we all assumed that it would be a bigger part of the conversation already, so it’ll be interesting to see what happens.”

It's worth clarifying that Marvel Studios hasn't actually changed the movie's title to The New Avengers, and is simply "spelling out the asterisk" as part of a new marketing push. It remains to be seen if it pays off, buy the switch is sure to gain the film at least a little more attention as we head into its first week in theaters.

In Thunderbolts*, Marvel Studios assembles an unconventional team of antiheroes — Yelena Belova, Bucky Barnes, Red Guardian, Ghost, Taskmaster and John Walker. After finding themselves ensnared in a death trap set by Valentina Allegra de Fontaine, these disillusioned castoffs must embark on a dangerous mission that will force them to confront the darkest corners of their pasts. Will this dysfunctional group tear themselves apart, or find redemption and unite as something much more before it’s too late?

Returning to their Marvel Cinematic Universe roles are Florence Pugh, Sebastian Stan, David Harbour, Wyatt Russell, Olga Kurylenko, Hannah John-Kamen and Julia Louis-Dreyfus. The cast also includes newcomers to the MCU—Lewis Pullman, Geraldine Viswanathan, Chris Bauer and Wendell Edward Pierce.

Jake Schreier directs Thunderbolts* with Kevin Feige producing. Louis D’Esposito, Brian Chapek and Jason Tamez serve as executive producers.

Marvel Studios’ Thunderbolts* opens in U.S. theaters on May 2, 2025.

Marvel Studios Releases New Trailer For THE NEW AVENGERS - But Is THUNDERBOLTS' Title Change Official?
Related:

Marvel Studios Releases New Trailer For THE NEW AVENGERS - But Is THUNDERBOLTS' Title Change Official?

THUNDERBOLTS*: 10 Easter Eggs, References, And Cameos You Need To See - SPOILERS
Recommended For You:

THUNDERBOLTS*: 10 Easter Eggs, References, And Cameos You Need To See - SPOILERS

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Lisa89
Lisa89 - 5/5/2025, 10:11 PM
Meta.
Feralwookiee
Feralwookiee - 5/5/2025, 10:31 PM
This marketing campaign is more desperate than me at singles night at my local bar.
SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 5/5/2025, 11:01 PM
@Feralwookiee - Is that why you ended up at that Glory Hole two Saturdays ago?
AleSir19
AleSir19 - 5/5/2025, 11:17 PM
@SonOfAGif - yes
MikeyL
MikeyL - 5/5/2025, 10:33 PM
“It’s so interesting in this world, and Kevin [Feige] talks about it sometimes, where sometimes they wanted things to leak and they don’t. I think we all assumed that it would be a bigger part of the conversation already,“

Man, it didn’t need to leak. Most people guessed it the second the asterisk was added. If you wanted an Avengers-level turnout for the film, you can’t play coy for a year when the film is about the B/C-tier characters of other projects. You’d have to have hyped it as New Avengers from the jump.

It doesn’t take a marketing degree to know that a super last minute switcheroo with the title won’t generate as much buzz as they wanted when the general audience don’t care about these characters or this film a lot to begin with.

TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 5/5/2025, 10:34 PM
It’s interesting to hear about how Marvel has apparently wanted some stuff to leak but it hasn’t which makes me wonder what those are?.

Personally , I felt the asterisk was a tongue in cheek thing since Red Guardian would be the one pushing the Thunderbolts name while the rest of the team was hesitant or against it to fit the somewhat irrevent tone of the film but many had already speculated it was a placeholder for New Avengers which they were right.

Anyway , I don’t think it’s any sort of nervous response to the film’s opening weekend since 160 or so million for a movie that stars these characters is pretty damn good but moreso it was indeed a planned marketing strategy that likely drums up more interest for the film hopefully since the Avengers brand still carries weight.
LeonNova
LeonNova - 5/5/2025, 10:39 PM
Translation: To try to boost the box office
epc1122
epc1122 - 5/5/2025, 10:41 PM
The movie just opened, having new posters and marketing takes time, if I had to guess, this was the plan all along and not reactionary to this weekends box office take. But people are going to think what they want.
Itwasme
Itwasme - 5/5/2025, 11:38 PM
@epc1122 - it would have been impossible to do this last minute. Just think how long Disney's legal team likely needs to sign off on certain things. Plus this level of coordination simply isn't realistic for it to happen without months of time.
SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 5/5/2025, 10:43 PM
Valentina is in control of the marketing. That bitch ...
Lucasberg
Lucasberg - 5/5/2025, 11:03 PM
There is no mystery about why the marketing has turned to this. Trying squeeze money outta this
Gambito
Gambito - 5/5/2025, 11:11 PM
I did like that they followed the comics and had Sentry as a member I remember those issues were my first introduction to the character in the same way the movie will be to a lot of people. Only thing they need is a true A-Lister
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 5/5/2025, 11:34 PM
Marvel being more desperate than me trying to find a Ne Zha 2 showing for my 6th viewing after it has been pulled out of theaters 😅

#DesperateMarvel
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 5/5/2025, 11:37 PM
Tbh, i hate to see this film fail while the pathetic D&W got 1B. It's a guarantee what Feige will do from now on

#DesperateMarvel
TheShellyMan
TheShellyMan - 5/5/2025, 11:37 PM
Cause they need the $$$.
Itwasme
Itwasme - 5/5/2025, 11:39 PM
I really like how it plays into the real life reaction of the internet "fans" who crap on everything. It's like the more they complain about it, better it works. Very meta.
SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 5/6/2025, 12:18 AM
@Itwasme - Deadpool would love how meta this is.
JusticeUnity
JusticeUnity - 5/6/2025, 12:02 AM
It is worth noting that on Marvel's official website, the movie is now being referred to as The New Avengers. I'm not sure if they'll be able to officially rebrand it through theaters, but at least internally it seems like they have a clear understanding of the new title.
WakandaTech
WakandaTech - 5/6/2025, 12:58 AM
Marvel has fallen so low

That they are reduced to stupid gimmicks to try to make
box office

You should never put avengers name on any Marvel movie unless it’s for an avengers movie

Stupid mistake
Truoptimusprime
Truoptimusprime - 5/6/2025, 1:03 AM
Trevor should have been in this movie with a busted ironman armor that shit would have been a pretty funny touch 🤣
NinnesMBC
NinnesMBC - 5/6/2025, 1:15 AM
I agree with the director's explanation, it's been there for a whole year and it's about time to reveal it without any kind of delays. This was always in their marketing's plan and good of them that they are sticking with it. Their numbers at the box office were good too, #1 in USA and soon will make back their budget.

Can't wait to see it.
PartyKiller
PartyKiller - 5/6/2025, 1:32 AM
Wyatt Russell as US Agent really stood out on the movie. The fact the mArVeL considered making him evil & killing him off shows that have no damn idea what works & what doesn't. They wanted us to hate the character in the awful Falcon & Winter Soldier series but he was great.

It's the same thing with Daryl & TWD. He was supposed to be hated & get killed off. Marvel has an interesting character there but he's a white male...so they won't develop him properly.

Bucky had some great moments but he never gets to go all the way. He gets reeled back in to be just another character.

Shitry was not a good idea. The actor fit the part but Shitry is another bad idea from 2000s comics that should never have made it to the MCU.

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder