Watchmen: Ocular Penetration

Watchmen: Ocular Penetration

Does Synder use the graphic novel as the sole source for the film or just as a platform for the film to take off from?

Review Opinion
By CBMcontributor - Mar 04, 2009 10:03 AM EST
Filed Under: Watchmen

I am a watchmen junkie. I have read the graphic novel multiple times and have been watching the Watchmen: Motion Comic religiously. So I had my bases covered when going into the advanced screening for the film. In the end, I left the screening re-playing scenes in my head, thinking about certain bits of dialogue re-arranged, as well as being left puzzled in the wake of the film and most importantly, I was left wanting more. But, isn't that a good thing?

Did I attend the movie with my graphic novel in hand? Yes. Did I try to go page to page, chapter to chapter during the film? Well, I tried in the beginning. Not that everyone should, I felt I wanted to see how Synder would be pacing the film. A pace that turns out to be going by fast.

To say the least, Synder left little room to be bored with. Moving quickly through the chapters of the graphic novel, I felt that he was able to capture the constant movement from the novel, the type of movement that keeps you from turning each page in anticipation. But does the film move to quickly for the unexpecting and for those not familiar with the novel? Yes. Is that entirely
a bad thing? No, not by any means. However, will audiences hate the film because of these reasons? Again, I don't believe so, it will only make them want to see the film again and again in order to be in the know-how.

Focusing on the adaption of the novel to the film, we can't write the film off as it is now as either a success or a failure. Obviously, the studio exec's made Synder trim down the film to what we view it as currently, omitting the novels slow detective build up for a visual overload in the film. However, I believe it works great for the Watchmen.

The extended action scenes are way badass. No other way to describe it, Synder is all over that. Well done Zack.

The Comedian and Rorschach are both amazing. The actors truly became there characters. Silk Spectre II and Nite Owl II are everything you could ask for in the film. Dr.Manhattan voice shouldn't be so...human, but I understand why it isn't as cool sounding as it is in the Motion Comic. And in the end, Matthew Goode truly becomes Ozymandias. When the climatic fight scene at the end begins, with Nite Owl II and Rorschach fighting Ozy at the same time, there should be a true moment of happiness for any fan boy. Adrian Veidt is born on the silver screen.

Lastly, the soundtrack. Truly, the weakest part of the film. Thanks Tyler Bates for [frick]ing this one up. Soundtracks can make or break a film and while even Tyler Bates shitty attempt at the soundtrack doesn't ruin the film, it makes for obvious criticism. The original score is done quite nicely, especially when Manhattan gets to Mars. Pure cinematic heaven. Yet, the soundtrack with songs from Bob Dylan, KC & The Sunshine, Billie Holiday, Hendrix, Garfunkel and Nina Simone make the film more enjoyable, capturing the essence of the time periods throughout the film, the awkward Ride of the Valkyries during the Vietnam scenes make it feel way out of place. This isn't Apocalypse Now and it should've became one of the films centerpieces. I wasn't even taken that back with Leonard Cohens Hallelujah, it actually proved a nice break from the films relentless ongoings.

The there is the climatic ending and then the credits. Wanting to sit there and think about this great film was cut short by being blasted with the worst closing credits song ever, provided nonetheless by My Chemical Romance with the worst rendition of Desolation Row ever. [frick]ing horrendous. When the film ends, it certainly does end, just get up and leave. The quicker you get up and leave and you aren't subject to screaming bullshit will make the movie-going experience that much better. Who thought it was a good idea to have My Chemical Romance at the end of the film? It provides nothing but a headache after watching 2 1/2 hours of awesomeness. Tyler Bates dropped the ball on this one.

In the end, the moment of truth will come when the Directors Cut is released. Once the Tales of the Freighter is spliced in and once the extra hour of footage is added, only then will come the time to decide whether or not Synder did justice to the Watchmen. Until then, we are given quite the visual treat to watch over and over.

A job certainly well done. Bravo Zack Synder,

Cheers.

WATCHMEN CHAPTER I Clip Recreates Two Big Scenes From Alan Moore And Dave Gibbons' Iconic Graphic Novel
Related:

WATCHMEN CHAPTER I Clip Recreates Two Big Scenes From Alan Moore And Dave Gibbons' Iconic Graphic Novel

WATCHMEN CHAPTER I Red-Band Trailer Released Along With Full Cast List And Blu-ray Cover Art
Recommended For You:

WATCHMEN CHAPTER I Red-Band Trailer Released Along With Full Cast List And Blu-ray Cover Art

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Shaman
Shaman - 3/4/2009, 1:42 PM
"But does the film move to quickly for the unexpecting and for those not familiar with the novel? Yes. Is that entirely a bad thing? No, not by any means. However, will audiences hate the film because of these reasons? Again, I don't believe so, it will only make them want to see the film again and again in order to be in the know-how."

Actually, i just read the book for the first time and it made me feel like i should read it again. So if the same goes for the movie, that means Snyder did a monumental job of capturing the source and adapting it to the screen.

Great review!!!
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 3/4/2009, 2:50 PM
Yeah, nice one man. lol at the Chemical Romance rant..seriously, i dont know what they were thinking getting those [frick]wits to do a song for the movie..and THAT song aswell!
Trioch
Trioch - 3/4/2009, 8:57 PM
Nice review! I agree the song in the end credits was ridiculous, but I liked all other parts of soundtrack used throughout the movie. Great action and good adaptation for the general non-watchmen orientated public. Cant wait to see the directors cut!!!!!
FalconX2
FalconX2 - 3/4/2009, 9:10 PM
(Sorry for the length, I'm just getting ansy/excited to see this monster! Just ignore me if you like, I'm just rambling at this point. Haha)

"But does the film move to quickly for the unexpecting and for those not familiar with the novel? Yes."

This is actually one of the reasons Alan Moore didn't wanted to see Watchmen as a movie. He wanted to make a story that you not only had to read over and over, but allowed you to flip back a few pages to make the connections between scenes.

This was before DVD/Bluray/PCDVD tech was common. I believe Dave Gibbons has even said that the movie will give a more Watchmen-esque experience (than the big screen) because you can pause, stop, and go between scenes with a touch of a button.

"Focusing on the adaption of the novel to the film, we can't write the film off as it is now as either a success or a failure."

!!!SPOILER!!!
Personally, I don't think the movie needs to be judged on how accurate the story matches the book (even though I do so love that squid). My wife is reading it at the moment for the first time, and one of the things she noticed is that you really don't get a whole lot of storyline progression until around chapter 9. You start with Blake's murder and Rorshach's investigation which leads to Doc M, Laurie and Dan and then plot is almost placed on hold. It then becomes a massive character study for almost 3/4 of the book.

Sure you get moments like Rorshach getting set up at Moloch's. But really that was just a reason to get into his background more, and then once you find out about Ozy in the end, even the act of Rorshach's setup becomes part of a character study of Ozy.

The biggest point for me would be to make the audience want to question those with the "power."
/SPOILER

Really, if the film does more justice to expressing the characters, regardless of what story progression is, then (to me) it is a success.

I'm more likely to go into the movie with a checklist of philosophical studies rather than the novel to gauge what I believe is accuracy.

But all this is just what I would find important. Everyone takes something different from Watchmen, that is one of things that makes it so awesome! The same images, same words, on the same pages, but we all see something different.

Great review!
Ilw1331
Ilw1331 - 3/5/2009, 6:42 AM
Nice review man. I'm glad you know exactly what you're talking about and viewing it with an open mind. Thank you.
saturnkid13
saturnkid13 - 3/6/2009, 2:51 PM
Okay, so I saw an 11:55 showing of Watchmen last night, which was incredible. Tyler Bates’ score in particular was fantastic. He’s doing a CD signing at Emerald Knights Comics and Games in Burbank on Saturday March 7th at 3:00pm.

Emerald Knights Comics and Games
4116 W. Burbank Blvd.
Burbank, CA 91505
818-588-3631 / 588-3641

http://ekcomicsandgames.com/

Also, he made a recent appearance on a Los Angeles NPR Station (KCRW’s “Morning Becomes Eclectic”) and gave an interesting interview. You should all give a listening:

http://www.kcrw.com/music/programs/mb/mb090305tyler_bates

His score along with the soundtrack to the film are both awesome, and available now in stores and on iTunes. Check it out!
blacksword7
blacksword7 - 3/6/2009, 11:19 PM
the score has had a bit of controversy surroundiing it, i thought it was great.
View Recorder