AVENGERS Director Joss Whedon Shows Support For Edgar Wright

Joss and Kevin Feige from Marvel are both on Wright's side. Stop be haters.

He's on the right side. Am I Wright?

It's a business, and is surely to tussle done feathers if in fact what happened actually happened, all speculation. I'll be honest I wasn't a fan of what Edgar wright was trying to do, especially the age problem. So I'm not going to act like marvel is unwarranted in taking an issue with it.

But my whole thing is, the only reason they would have their own staff edit the script, is if it conflicts with something now continuity wise, or will in the future. And marvel works hard to keep everything in tact, though the universe is growing really fast. This isn't easy. This is my guys as to why it happened, and Edgar most likely didn't like what he was left with.

That's why a director like joss works so well. He understand the lore and the significance of continuity and reputation of the comic book form on the big screen, which requires working around creative limitations as he did as a comic book writer, one can't write one comic book that jeopardizes stories of other comics within the universe. Same thing is happening here.

Overall I think he is saddened that wright had to leave, but also understands why marvel did what they did.

He's probably the only one given creative control.

Corny!

@jollem

Wait what? Lol what does Marvel "extremist fans" have to do with the article? Do you need to find a way to troll EVERY marvel article?

Time will tell.

No one is bigger than the film. It has to fit in with the rest of the MCU.

For James and Kevin: Was there ever a time when you had very opposing visions on a scene or character and how did you resolve that issue?

James Gunn: Every day. But the great thing about Kevin and me working together is that neither one of us have big egos about what we're doing. What's important is always creating the best movie possible, not getting what we want just because we think we're right. The truth is we agree 99% of the time. Those times that we don't, we talk about it, argue about it. Usually one of us wins the argument (our editors Fred Raskin and Craig Wood are often a part of these). In those times no one wins we screen both versions and see what the audiences think. But, again, this has been over relatively minor stuff. Also, I trust Kevin on a lot of big issues and I think he trusts me a lot when it comes to comedy and character stuff. It's a really fun and enlivening partnership.

Getting "antsy" to hear the truth from the actual parties involved.
Want them to discuss it & not hear rumors only.

I like how the Marvelites have started to blame Wright and that it is all for the best............ so sad so sad!

Catch up^^

Who are this yes-men you are talking about? That's just stupid.
In TIH Norton had the control thanks for his big ego.
Jon Favreau had control of Ironman 1 and nobody said nothing about Thor and Cap.
The avenger, Marvel had a big part in the desicions of that movie (not just the ones you don't like).
Ironman 3, complete control on director and writer.
Thor 2, the only thing. marvel change was Loki's dead.
Cap2, anyone wil say something bad about it? No?

@Bekss It isn't ego when they promise you control and don't deliver.