Tom Brevoort Talks About The Correlation Between Marvel Comics And Movies

Tom Brevoort Talks About The Correlation Between Marvel Comics And Movies

Executive Editor, Tom Brevoort, sat down to talk about how publishing effects Marvel movies, as well as the difference in dealing with X-Men: First Class and The Amazing Spider-Man compared to the in house properties such as Thor, Iron Man, Captain America, and The Avengers.

By WaylonJones - May 16, 2011 02:05 PM EST
Filed Under: Marvel Comics
Source: Comic Book Resources



Comic Book Resources recently got the chance to sit down with Tom Brevoort, Executive Editor at Marvel, where he talked about how involved publishing is with Marvel movies. He also talks about how involved Marvel is with franchises such as X-Men: First Class and The Amazing Spider-Man.

Said Brevoort:

Certainly we publish a lot of X-Men comics and a lot of Spider-Man comics. The difference is that – at least in publishing – on a day-to-day basis we're not even aware of what's going on with the film production on both of those characters. I've seen the "X-Men: First Class" trailers, and I know exactly as much about it as you do. Where as with the Marvel Studios films that we're doing ourselves, we're much more actively involved on a regular basis, and so there's a little more opportunity for cross-platforming and cross-integration. A lot of that also has to do with the fact that the Marvel Creative Committee – which includes Dan [Buckley] and Joe [Quesada] and a few other folks – are involved in giving notes and feedback to Kevin Feige and his guys. So there’s a more direct pipeline. Every once in a while, Brian Bendis will start talking about something in regards to an Avengers script, and it’ll take me a few seconds to realize “Oh! He’s had some previous conversation with someone who’s involved with one of the films, and he’s put forth an idea there that he also wants to explore in Avengers.”

The immediacy of the interaction is such that it’s more natural that those characters are going to come to the fore. I think regardless, if you’re doing a big film with any of the characters, they’re going to become bigger. And if you have a successful film as we did with “Iron Man,” well then Iron Man is almost immediately going to become a much more important, much more prominent Marvel character. That’s true regardless of what we do in Publishing, though I think we should certainly take advantage of that in Publishing and steer into that. As Marvel Studios gears up towards a major film, we’re going to know about it, and if we’re not doing a lot of stuff with the characters involved yet – though it’s not like we were ever not doing stuff with Iron Man, Thor or Captain America – it’s easier when we know what things are coming up to direct our efforts on them. We aim for the movie release time and make sure there’s an accessible, mainstream-friendly story that’s in a collection on bookstore shelves. And we make sure there’s enough exposure for those characters, to help prime the pump for the film release.

So I don’t think there’s any greater emphasis on the Marvel Studios characters than the ones optioned by other studios. If you look at our Previews catalogue, it’s not like we’ve taken our foot off the gas on X-Men or Spider-Man. We still publish plenty of both, and we still put the same kind of resources against those books as we do Iron Man or Thor. Those characters matter to us. It’s just a little easier to get behind Iron Man or Cap or the Avengers because we know more about what’s going on on the film side. More of us have read the script or seen the production designs, and that tends to get people excited about the possibilities.


X-Men: First Class is the next Marvel movie to come out, look for it in theaters on June 3, 2011.

free twitter icons
Eisner Award Winner Jen Bartel Reveals Why She Stopped Illustrating Covers For Marvel Comics
Related:

Eisner Award Winner Jen Bartel Reveals Why She Stopped Illustrating Covers For Marvel Comics

IRON MAN #1 Variant Cover Reveals New Look At Tony Stark's Improvised Armor By Artist Philip Tan
Recommended For You:

IRON MAN #1 Variant Cover Reveals New Look At Tony Stark's "Improvised" Armor By Artist Philip Tan

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

WaylonJones
WaylonJones - 5/16/2011, 2:20 PM
;)
superotherside
superotherside - 5/16/2011, 2:35 PM
interesting... still marvel should at least try to get spiderman and the xmen back!
marvel72
marvel72 - 5/16/2011, 2:36 PM
marvel should have more say into what goes into other studios films.

they did create the characters after all i.e if you put galactus in your movie,make sure he looks like galactus & not a f*ckin cloud.
AlcoholicA
AlcoholicA - 5/16/2011, 2:43 PM
@ marvel 72

ahh yes....cloud Galactus.... <-------face palms slowly and sighs
Reasonnnn
Reasonnnn - 5/16/2011, 2:56 PM
This is a nice way of saying eff you Fox and Sony.
JULES
JULES - 5/16/2011, 2:58 PM
@marvel & Al - I agree biggest let down since I found out my old high school's abstinence program wasn't about how to skip school. I don't know why studios make some iconic villains into evil clouds. Clouds should be fluffy not Evil.

I have seen the future the next Cloud Baddie aka "cumulus villainous" will be Apocalypse. He will have 15 mins screen time and be defeated by Wolverine (duh).
ironpool007
ironpool007 - 5/16/2011, 3:35 PM
Marvel Studios for the win! Sony's ok. FOX can go [frick]!
EastcoastAvenger
EastcoastAvenger - 5/16/2011, 4:12 PM
How in the world can Marvel get the rights to X-Men, FF, Silver Surfer and Spiderman. I mean SPIDERMAN and WOLVERINE can't be touched by Marvel Studios?! That would be like DC/Warner Bros. not being able to make a Superman or Batman movie. It's absurd!
valeriesghost
valeriesghost - 5/16/2011, 4:16 PM
I asked Brain Michael Bendis about that @ the Emerald City ComicCon this year and he said pretty much the same thing. They don't know shit about what sony and fox are doing, even though they are using Ult Spidey as an influence, he said i probably know more then he does about it. Its sad, really.
Spock
Spock - 5/16/2011, 4:19 PM
Ah the clouds, Darkside & Galactus, next will be Thanos!, nice to have another opinion.
JohnTom88
JohnTom88 - 5/16/2011, 4:37 PM
The difference between DC and Marvel is Marvel can still thrive without its 2 biggest characters because Marvel lineup is wider and the smaller guys are still relevant.
TheDorkKnight
TheDorkKnight - 5/16/2011, 4:40 PM
@eastcoast so true, it is absolutely [frick]ing preposterous. oooh weee what up wit that? what up wit that?
soberchimera
soberchimera - 5/16/2011, 5:10 PM
@JohnTom88 Well we have yet to see a movie from the DC Universe that hasn't been Batman or Superman related. Hopefully Green Lantern will open the door for Wonder Woman, Flash, Aquaman, and Green Arrow.
Ryguy88
Ryguy88 - 5/16/2011, 5:15 PM
FF2 would have been a shit movie whether or not Galactus was cloud.

It's great that the Marvel writers are somewhat involved in making their own movies but it really has nothing to do with making the movies any better. A bad movie will be a bad movie no matter how close it is to the source material, and I think that could be said to some degree for a good movie as well.
Chewtoy
Chewtoy - 5/16/2011, 6:02 PM
I'm mildly horrified by Quesada and Bendis now giving input to the Marvel films. Everything I've liked about the films produced so far predates the current creative regime. Those guys more or less got me out of reading comics.
DeadPoolLax
DeadPoolLax - 5/16/2011, 6:31 PM
Does that piss anybody else off? That they're putting more into the marvel movie properties than the fox and Sony movie properties. As a more Deadpool/x-men fan, it deeply depresses me. Don't get me wrong, from a business standpoint, its smart; but, goddamn that's a punch to the metaphorical crotch. F(rick) fox and Sony. They ruin CBMs to no end. The first x-men and Spiderman were good because they the first of their kind, and marvel didn't know what they could have had. Its sad. I just hope that marvel gets the rights before I die.
xstryker
xstryker - 5/16/2011, 6:55 PM
Fox can keep the right to X-Men for all I care - the last thing I wanna read as a fan of X-Comics is "an accessible, mainstream-friendly story". Keep X-Men weird!
WarnerBrother
WarnerBrother - 5/16/2011, 9:16 PM
Its not a question of Marvel having a wider lineup then DC.Rather,it is the fact that Marvel was broke in the 90's when it made it's film deals with FOX,SONY,UNIVERSAL and LIONSGATE. People seem to have forgotten that Marvel could not get a superhero movie made to save it's life back in the day,while WB/DC was making cash money hand over fist with Superman and Batman.Marvel was over a barrel and in no position to set conditions to have the properties returned if/when Marvel films became hits.Thats why Marvel got for lack of a better term,raped by the studios.Keep in mind that back in the 90's nobody was certain that CBM's would ever be cost effective beyond Superman and Batman,2 heros with mass recognition by the general public and unlike Spider-Man had powers that could be effectively presented by the limited special effects tech of the day. Even DC,after the success of Batman failed to see the potential of starting a family of DC films in the 90's when it should have adapted The Flash as a film series.Imagine if the money that was spent on one season of the show had been invested in a movie with a popular star of the era (say Kevin Costner) as Barry Allen,DC would have had a monopoly on it's hands.
JohnTom88
JohnTom88 - 5/16/2011, 9:52 PM
^ Marvel didn't have WB subsidizing its movie ventures. It's not wise to look behind. As it's now Marvel have 6 of their biggest characters already on the big screen and having Disney as the big daddy like WB to DC. Couple of its secondary characters like Blade, F4, Daredevil, Ghost Rider, Punisher and the X-Men bunch are also on screen. Feige are also talking about characters from Nova, Dr Strange, Ms Marvel to Kazar as future movies while I never heard Rubinov talking about Hawkman or some other more obscure DC characters. Well yes DC have Vertigo and Wildstorm characters but will people remembered them as DC's own? Most likely similar to how people recognized Constantine, V for Vendetta and so on.


EarOne
EarOne - 5/16/2011, 11:18 PM
how LONG are the rights to characters sold by Marvel to other studios last?? is it a lifetime???

why did they agree to this?? they could've sold it for a period of a decade or two, but not unlimited...

and what is Disney doing about all this?? is THERE anything Disney can do to get those property rights back to Marvel???
robvillain
robvillain - 5/17/2011, 1:00 AM
^^^ehh, shut it
JohnTom88
JohnTom88 - 5/17/2011, 1:30 AM
History has shown Vertigo properties are not exactly commercial winners. The Losers? V for Vendetta? Pfft. What's cool in comics doesn't automatically get cool on the big screen. Especially those that are niche like what's done in Vertigo.

On the other hand, growing non-superhero tales are not so hard. Disney is going to integrate Marvel more to its non-superhero lineup (Pirates, Tron, etc) or try to get accomplished writer like Steven King did with Dark Towers comics as soon as the superhero fad crunch goes in full effect.

Edit: Constantine is somewhat a financial success. So I think there's a good chance for Vertigo stuff to be a BO hit.
TheDorkKnight
TheDorkKnight - 5/17/2011, 5:47 AM
DC is not that great. They've been Marvel's shit bucket for a while now so sorry.
View Recorder