Third Green Lantern Review! And It's...Another Negative?

Third Green Lantern Review! And It's...Another Negative?

Could this be the sign of a trend? Keith Uhlich adds another review to the currently-growing pile of negative Green Lantern reactions...

By Xenix - Jun 14, 2011 04:06 PM EST
Filed Under: Green Lantern
Source: New York Timeout



Hope springs eternal for the modern Hollywood superhero movie; someday, somehow, someone is going to make a real stunner. (Law of averages, right?) You feel a twinge of that let’s-do-better ambition at the start of Green Lantern, as the camera soars over a clearly digital, yet still beautifully designed, moonscape where three alien life forms stumble on something unholy. (The scene could have been transplanted directly from a ’50s space adventure like Forbidden Planet.) But no sooner are we introduced to giant-floating-head supervillain Parallax—who’s out to destroy the Lanterns, the universe’s cadre of protectors—than the film takes a ruinous detour to Earth.






Enter square-jawed daredevil Hal Jordan (Reynolds), he of the Ken doll physique and perfunctorily addressed daddy issues. The guy needs a calling, dammit! And boy, does he get one after being summoned to the side of a fallen Lantern, who gifts him his laser-light-show ring and cosmos-protecting powers. Time to kick it into high gear, right? Uh, sure, just after we attend to Hal’s nonstarter romance with plastic girl Carol Ferris (Lively, who isn’t). Oh, and there’s this other supervillain we gotta deal with—Hector Hammond (Sarsgaard, made up with a hilarious John Carpenter–esque bald pate). And hey, you ever wonder what happened to Angela Bassett? Oh, brother.





Hal does eventually travel to the mystical corps-HQ planet of Oa for some sequel-ready one-upmanship with baddie-in-training Sinestro (Strong), and the film’s very talented director, Martin Campbell (Casino Royale),handles these otherworld scenes, as well as the finale’s tentacle-tastic Parallax fight, with expected aplomb. But whenever this Lantern returns to terra firma (too often), its imaginative flights are ground down under the Warners overlords’ demographic-pandering heels.




This review follows two other negative reviews. Sadly, it seems a trend is starting for Green Lantern reviews. It sounds like the frequent Earth points in the film are the weakest points in Green Lantern, as some said for Thor.
2011's GREEN LANTERN Starring Ryan Reynolds Is Actually A Great Movie — Here's Why
Related:

2011's GREEN LANTERN Starring Ryan Reynolds Is Actually A Great Movie — Here's Why

GREEN LANTERN Director Martin Campbell Reveals The One Change That Would Have Made 2011 DC Movie Great
Recommended For You:

GREEN LANTERN Director Martin Campbell Reveals The One Change That Would Have Made 2011 DC Movie "Great"

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
TorturedXGenius
TorturedXGenius - 6/14/2011, 5:13 PM
why keep using fake/manipped pics? seems like this will be a mixed review movie (like thor eventually was) and the comparison that ppl wanted more 'outter space/realm' stuff than earth
Dynamo
Dynamo - 6/14/2011, 5:14 PM
Ah, god damn it Hollywood.
superotherside
superotherside - 6/14/2011, 5:18 PM
hmmm... weird... at least these aren't top reviewers at any rate i'll see the film before i judge...
greenlanter13
greenlanter13 - 6/14/2011, 5:19 PM
So did he like it or not?
greenlanter13
greenlanter13 - 6/14/2011, 5:32 PM
Well he says he likes the space stuff but not the earth stuff so I guess it's a mixes review
luckylu
luckylu - 6/14/2011, 5:33 PM
all these reviews sound like people who are already uninterested in fantasy/scifi movies
JatevinM
JatevinM - 6/14/2011, 5:33 PM
It looks to me like these people don't know how to review a movie.
LionPepsiJuice
LionPepsiJuice - 6/14/2011, 5:35 PM
if anything, at least this movie seems like its going to have a good climatic final battle, which some CBM's have a hard time getting right
Corpse
Corpse - 6/14/2011, 5:36 PM
LMAO! Every review so far has been strange. People are just giving these reviews too much than they deserve. Green Lantern is probably one of the harder comicbookmovies to make, of course some won't get it or understand it like us true fans will. So why are everyone getting so uptight about three bad reviews? It doesn't really matter. Just let the naive Marvel-fanboys do their thing, as every little kid does. "My movie had better reviews", please get out of the playground - reviewers are so relative to another it makes no sense comparing or drawing conclusions based on them. There will come positive reviews as well, so all you just have to do is to watch it for yourself and make up your own mind. And don't be a puppet.
ALmighty1080
ALmighty1080 - 6/14/2011, 5:48 PM
where the hell is the review, there is no review here. i am confused. read the review for xmen first class by these guys too, he insults the film but doesnt explain why. he also insulted Super 8. its just random paragraphs about the story but nothing about why its bad.
RockNRollCC
RockNRollCC - 6/14/2011, 5:52 PM
Im gonna laugh if this flops, but I'll be really pissed in the end.

I'll laugh because I'm a Deadpool fan, but i will be extremely disappointed because:

-DC and WB are gonna go hide behind Batman again.

-Instead of this, Ryan Reynolds could have been doing Deadpool, and we would have most likely seen a release date by late this year/mid next year.
axiouz
axiouz - 6/14/2011, 5:52 PM
Better we wait for 3 days than to trust on these reviews, I think they didn't get the feel of it and just started bashing, can't really accept the reviews till I see it for my self. You better not suck Green lantern .___.
Anthrax
Anthrax - 6/14/2011, 5:59 PM
HAHAHA I [frick]ING KNEW IT I WAS HOLDING THAT IN FOR MONTHS!
Anthrax
Anthrax - 6/14/2011, 6:06 PM
CAPS going to own this bitch.
pitchblack
pitchblack - 6/14/2011, 6:10 PM
Again with the artsy sites. The reviewers at this site also gave both Thor and First Class 2 out of 5 stars.
Chewtoy
Chewtoy - 6/14/2011, 6:10 PM
Rex Reed absolutely destroys the film in his review... So that's #4.
marvel72
marvel72 - 6/14/2011, 6:26 PM
all these bad reveiws means now the flash will be put on hold & we'll get f*ckin more batman films.

@ intruder

how comes you are no longer number 1 troll & where have all your tags gone.
TheBlur214
TheBlur214 - 6/14/2011, 6:46 PM
Hey guys, I'm a newbie here, but I created a account just to post that you're jumping the gun if you already think that Green Lantern is a bad movie just based on these 3 reviews. If you do your homework, you will see that:

Time Out New York gave only 2 stars to Thor, X-Men First Class, and now Green Lantern.

Village Voice slammed both Thor and X-Men First Class, and now Green Lantern.

And so far Total Magazine is really the only credible review for being negative towards it with 2 stars, since they did give Thor 3 stars and X-Men First Class 4 stars.

But if you go by those points, to me it's really just 1 bad review so far and let's wait and see over the next few days what all the main, more reliable critics think of it before we just assume this is going to be bad.
Anthrax
Anthrax - 6/14/2011, 6:47 PM
unfriendly spidey has a hard on for you
Anthrax
Anthrax - 6/14/2011, 6:48 PM
@TheBlur sup newbie
ThreeBigTacos
ThreeBigTacos - 6/14/2011, 6:50 PM
MrNoFear: butt hurt much?
seamuskeaneart
seamuskeaneart - 6/14/2011, 7:08 PM
Remember, when Star Wars was released it got mostly negative reviews and we all know how that turned out.
ISleepNow
ISleepNow - 6/14/2011, 7:09 PM
Strike 1, Strike2..

magma123
magma123 - 6/14/2011, 10:05 PM
Crappy 'reviews'. these are just attention seekers by releasing the review early...

To quote TheBlur214:

"Time Out New York gave only 2 stars to Thor, X-Men First Class, and now Green Lantern.

Village Voice slammed both Thor and X-Men First Class, and now Green Lantern.

And so far Total Magazine is really the only credible review for being negative towards it with 2 stars, since they did give Thor 3 stars and X-Men First Class 4 stars."

See that idiots? Of course this movie won't be [frick]ing great but these 'reviewers' all saying shit
young-gun
young-gun - 6/14/2011, 10:05 PM
People, why do we care so much about film reviewers? In a age where any tom dick or harry can "review" a film and give their - what usually is - negative opinion about it. If it sucks then it sucks if its good then its good. Some of us will like it and some wont but who cares about some reviews. Go see it if you want (I sure as hell do) and enjoy it. Us comic book fans need to loosen up a bit. Most reviewers are people who studied film and have no real clue how to make one so they give bad press about everyone who can.
1 2
View Recorder