Zack Snyder Reveals A BATMAN v SUPERMAN Easter Egg Which Would Have Tied Into JUSTICE LEAGUE: PART 2

Zack Snyder Reveals A BATMAN v SUPERMAN Easter Egg Which Would Have Tied Into JUSTICE LEAGUE: PART 2

Zack Snyder is never going to get the opportunity to direct Justice League: Part 2 but the filmmaker has now revealed an Easter Egg in Batman v Superman which would have paid off in that movie...

By JoshWilding - Mar 18, 2018 04:03 AM EST
Filed Under: Justice League
Source: Batman-News
When Zack Snyder was busy working on Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, Warner Bros.' plan was to release a two-part Justice League movie as a follow-up of sorts. Unfortunately, those plans changed when the team-up was met with a negative response from critics and underperformed at the box office and, well, we all know what happened to the standalone Justice League which was released last year.

Now, Snyder has taken to Vero to reveal that the crosses in the background of the image above were placed there as "a reference to Justice League 2...until it wasn't." That latter remark is clearly referencing the movie's cancellation but we're now left to speculate how the filmmaker was planning on using this scene as an Easter Egg; could it have had something to do with the death of another hero?

Snyder has been talking openly about his scrapped plans for Justice  League for a while now, so here's hoping he'll one day spill the beans on what exactly he had planned for the DC Films Universe. After all, it's clear that he had some very strong ideas for where things should go but the studio didn't agree with them. What do you think this Easter Egg could mean? Let us know your thoughts down below.

James Gunn Weighs In On JUSTICE LEAGUE Movie Rumors And Reveals Comic That's A Big Influence On DCU
Related:

James Gunn Weighs In On JUSTICE LEAGUE Movie Rumors And Reveals Comic That's A "Big Influence" On DCU

JUSTICE LEAGUE Star Amy Adams Praises Henry Cavill And Talks James Gunn's SUPERMAN Recasting
Recommended For You:

JUSTICE LEAGUE Star Amy Adams Praises Henry Cavill And Talks James Gunn's SUPERMAN Recasting

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
RageDriver2401
RageDriver2401 - 3/18/2018, 4:18 AM
First. I was just about to post this in comments somewhere. New trend on Vero. #UntilItWasnt. Snyder's cult on Vero is going crazy.
Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 3/18/2018, 4:21 AM
The Justice League was going to rival the Avengers, too.

#untilitwasnt
SisterSunday52
SisterSunday52 - 3/18/2018, 9:59 AM
@Spock0Clock - That's what happens when you fire the only person who has a plan and then replace him with someone who doesn't know the significance of the story. Especially with the divisiveness of The Last Jedi, there's no question in my mind that Justice League would have made just as much, if not more than Batman v Superman if Zack Snyder had been allowed to finish it, or if Whedon followed his story instead of going in a different direction with it. Their opposing directions tore the film apart, and it tore the audience apart too. Pretty much the audience who saw Batman v Superman for the novelty of it, saw Justice League for the same reason, with a few more DC fans who also watched it. Then the DC and DC Films fans who kept going to Batman v Superman, when everyone else rage quit, started #ReleaseTheSnyderCut and the Justice League theatrical film bombed. If the studio had trusted Snyder and actually HELPED him by getting his true message (of hope rising in a world that seems devoid of it) across, as Patty Jenkins did with Wonder Woman, instead of trying to destroy everything, the film would have done, and been much better.
WilliamHMacy
WilliamHMacy - 3/18/2018, 10:17 AM
@Spock0Clock - #untiljosswhedontookover
Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 3/18/2018, 11:13 AM
@WilliamHMacy - Yep... WB screened those early cuts and thought... "This movie will make a billion and a half dollars if we finish it, but instead, let's get the guy who already made that a movie that was super-successful and have him completely mess it up."
GreypilgrimXXX
GreypilgrimXXX - 3/18/2018, 11:22 AM
@SisterSunday52 - "If the studio had trusted Snyder "
Thats the first problem right there boyo, they trusted him with 1 movie and it was okay but divisive. They then trusted him with pitting the two biggest comic book heroes around and that did not pan out. They then trusted him to bring together one of the biggest Superhero groups ever and well, that turned into pure shyte. The best thhing the studio did was fire Snyders @$$.
SisterSunday52
SisterSunday52 - 3/18/2018, 12:44 PM
@GreypilgrimXXX - First of all, I'm a lass, not a boyo. Second of all, their mistake WAS in not trusting Snyder. Instead of giving Batman v Superman a 2 hour and 50 minute runtime (we didn't need the David Goyer self congratulatory garbage Easter egg or the scenes suggesting Wallace Keefe's innocence, and, if Snyder hadn't fully thought out his origins for Cyborg and what weapon Aquaman used, he could have come up with something better for that) they cut out a large portion of Superman's character arc to make room for more Batman, and the film was released at an uneven 2 hours and 30 minutes. Then, when the film was shredded by critics and audiences, they hired a trailer making company to finish the next film in their slate. Then, even though Patty Jenkins made a critical and commercial success out of his Wonder Woman story, proving that his vision does work when given proper attention, instead of being hacked to pieces, they had already fired him and hired Whedon to go in a completely different direction which tore Justice League apart. They didn't trust Snyder. He came up with a whole Cinematic Universe and they destroyed it to make that Marvel money by carbon copying them, which led to their biggest box office failure in years as #ReleaseTheSnyderCut sent a message to the studio that they were sick of the studio intervention. If Whedon was brought on to help Snyder tell people what he was showing them, instead of trying to tell a completely different story, the film would have been much more successful.
cbostont102
cbostont102 - 3/18/2018, 2:25 PM
@SisterSunday52 - never really cared for Synders plan. I’ll give him an A for effort but I wouldn’t have given him another shot after MOS. My expectations were too high for MOS and he never reached them.
SisterSunday52
SisterSunday52 - 3/18/2018, 3:55 PM
@cbostont102 - You didn't like the struggle of a boy from another planet to find a way to use his abilities to help others while protecting his secret and the people of Smallville, nor did you like how he finds joy in achieving that goal as Superman? Well, everyone likes different things. I guess.

He exceeded expectations in my opinion.
cbostont102
cbostont102 - 3/18/2018, 4:21 PM
@SisterSunday52 - if that’s what I saw I would’ve been happy. However, you described “Smallville” and episodes of that show were written better than MOS. BvS and Justice League. there were some fantastic episodes of Smallville.
OptionFour
OptionFour - 3/18/2018, 7:59 PM
@SisterSunday52 - How much negative press, bad publicity, comparatively flat box office takes, and bad writing were they expected to 'trust' Snyder through for him to put out one good film?
Even as a huge DC fan I can't imagine rating MoS better than 'okay' as a film, and it was better than both BvS and JL. He didn't understand the characters or the stories, and if he did then he simply had no interest in showing them. Instead he opted for a half-assed "deconstruction" of the DC heroes that just didn't work. How long did they have to just trust him before he was going to have something pan out? Three films? Four? Six?
SisterSunday52
SisterSunday52 - 3/18/2018, 9:39 PM
@cbostont102 - That is what you saw in Man of Steel. You may not have known that you saw it, that's Snyder's biggest problem is that he'll show you what I just described above, but he doesn't tell you in his films that that's what you saw, so you misinterpret as something that gets the characters wrong. Either way, you did see what I described and you could probably realize you see it if you recognize the plot points throughout the film.
SisterSunday52
SisterSunday52 - 3/18/2018, 9:48 PM
@OptionFour - He both understood the characters and created stories that developed them into the heroes we know and love. The only thing he did wrong was that he showed us how they became the heroes we know and love. He did not tell us in his films so, because you misinterpreted his work, you ASSume that he doesn't understand the characters, when he actually gave us a Superman who uses his abilities because he wants to (not out of some tragic origin or because his Kryptonian father told him to) he gave us a Batman who learns that his rules against killing still matter even in a world of superpowered people and a Wonder Woman who has seen the worst of humanity, but still is determined to protect them. Just because people misinterpreted his stories of hope rising in a world that seems devoid of it as something else, does not mean their criticisms we're justified or even accurate. Man of Steel, Batman v Superman and Wonder Woman are the best DC Films and that's thanks to Snyder. Trailer Park's Suicide Squad and Justice League are the worst films and that's thanks to studio interference.
cbostont102
cbostont102 - 3/18/2018, 10:39 PM
@SisterSunday52 - I get what you’re saying. You loved it, I don’t. The movie wasn’t too smart for me I just didn’t care for some of the direction and execution.

Please don’t be one of the defenders that preach that someone doesn’t understand a scene when they have a different opinion.

Everyone doesn’t like the same cup of tea.

I’ll give another classic example from MOS. I can’t stand the scene where Pa Kent dies. I get it....I mean it’s not like it was all that subtle...I just don’t like it.

You can reply and say I have crappy taste or that I’m just too “unsmart” to understand what I’m watching but I like what I like and you like what you like.

Neither one of is is wrong. We have substantiated opinions of why we feel the way we do. Agree to disagree and don’t try to belittle the other party in the process.but hey, where’s the fun in that right?
OptionFour
OptionFour - 3/19/2018, 2:05 AM
@SisterSunday52 - There's no need to be insulting. Really? Calling me an ass? Grow up. Speak to me like an adult.

I understood exactly what he was trying to do and I didn't misinterpret his works at all - he just largely failed in his aims. I can completely understand a thing and still disagree with you about whether or not it was successful. That's the nature of opinions. Everything he did was stilted, poorly written, and hacky.
GreypilgrimXXX
GreypilgrimXXX - 3/23/2018, 9:52 AM
@SisterSunday52 - Snyder is not a good character director period? The closest he ever came to directing characters in a movie without focusing on visuals is Dawn Of The Dead. I have watched MOS, BvS and JL. Several times and Superman's capes had more character focus in the latter movies than anything else. The whole premise for BvS was a gamble and executed poorly, there were so many ways they could have approached that but Snyder in all his indulgence just wanted to see Batman and Superman fight. So many missed opportunities and you couple that with an indulgent director and you have a recipe for disaster. Yea the studio holds some blame but they should have never trusted the man to carry three films. After MOS they should have found another director to spearhead things. Said it before I will say it again, sorry for his tragedy but glad they fired his @$$.
CamtonoOfBeskar
CamtonoOfBeskar - 3/18/2018, 4:22 AM
Zack Snyder is just annoying now and both he and his stupid Easter Eggs need to go away.
Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 3/18/2018, 4:23 AM
@Primordiac - That's a lot funnier if they were literal eggs and he was just an eccentric chicken farmer.
RageDriver2401
RageDriver2401 - 3/18/2018, 4:30 AM
@Primordiac - Snyder's an attention whore. He keeps commenting on these random fan theories to get attention.

Someone needs to teach him how to prioritise.
1. Put together a cohesive, coherent story for the movie you're currently developing.
2. Then think about Easter eggs for movies that are years in the future and may or may not even happen.
Highflyer
Highflyer - 3/18/2018, 4:53 AM
@RageDriver2401 - I doubt its for attention reasons.
BloodyBed
BloodyBed - 3/18/2018, 5:40 AM
@Highflyer - maybe not consciously
SisterSunday52
SisterSunday52 - 3/18/2018, 1:25 PM
@BloodyBed - People, who collectively paid an additional 200+ million dollars on Batman v Superman and even more on its Ultimate Edition, then started a movement to get Snyder's cut of Justice League released demand more of his vision. All he is doing is satisfying our curiosity. If others have a problem with it, they don't have to click on the articles referencing it.
BloodyBed
BloodyBed - 3/18/2018, 3:30 PM
@SisterSunday52 - I mean, I am also in the group of people who bought the dvd. So I wouldn’t say that entire group wants more Bvs.

Also, I’m more concerned with Snyder’s mental health here. I think moving on is what he needs to do.
SisterSunday52
SisterSunday52 - 3/18/2018, 4:10 PM
@BloodyBed - I think he actually finds it therapeutic. I know if I were to devote all my creative energy to a series of films about my favorite characters in an effort to make them relatable to the general audience so that they would love them as much as I do, only for them to misinterpret them as this nihilistic demonization of the characters I love so much (even though that's not what I intended) and I was hated by one half of the fan community and one half of all other film audiences for what they thought I did, I would cry tears of joy if I were seeing that not everyone hated my work, and that they were willing to start a movement if it meant seeing more of it.
Kurne
Kurne - 3/18/2018, 4:22 AM
It seems like Zack wants to tell-all but he can't because it'll ruin the narrative.

I feel bad for what happened with his daughter. But there must have been some tampering with the story of his departure anyway. I really do think it collided with whatever his relationship with WB was at the time.
BlindAl9
BlindAl9 - 3/18/2018, 4:24 AM
Okay!that bvs easter egg shit is getting out of hand. Noboday cares anymore
BlindAl9
BlindAl9 - 3/18/2018, 5:09 AM
@BlindAl9 - *nobody
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
View Recorder