Are you a real X-Men fan?

Are you a real X-Men fan?

As I'm sure I'll receive much flak for this, it needs to be said. While I read people's posts day by day, I notice this consensus stating that the X-Men franchise is irreparably damaged to the point it is unsalvageable, and I wonder if those people stating this really know anything about the X-Men at all.

Editorial Opinion
By TheMyth - May 10, 2009 01:05 AM EST
Filed Under: X-Men

Why all the hate against the X-Men movie franchise? I hear all these people griping about how bad they suck and how completely unfixable the franchise is. But instead of hearing any reasons aside from recent events in the Wolverine movie(the DP screw up and a few others) all I see is outrage, which ultimately makes me wonder... how much do some of you know about the X-Men? This franchise is nowhere near dead by any means. I promise half of what some of you call '[frick]-ups' weren't [frick] ups at all, and the ones that are can either be easily fixed or linked in the comics. Don't get me wrong, there are some unique instances of silliness that really can't be excused/undone, like Emma Frost being anywhere near Wolverines origin or Weapon X. However, for every instance like this, there are 20 in which so many rabid fans perceive one of Fox famous 'liberties' but can in fact be tied to the comics in some way. That said, I issue a challenge to all CBM readers. Call me out on this by all means. "How can you tie Blob to the Wolverine movie?", "How can we bring Cyclops back logically?", "How can Xavier die and then be in a new body?" I can answer all those and more, and I am more then ready to. So bring it on folks, I'm ready to show you how Fox stood by the source a bit more closely than anyone thinks.

X-MEN: Kevin Feige Says AVENGERS: SECRET WARS Leads Us Into A New Age Of Mutants In The MCU
Related:

X-MEN: Kevin Feige Says AVENGERS: SECRET WARS "Leads Us Into A New Age Of Mutants" In The MCU

X-MEN Rumor May Reveal MCU Reboot Team And Surprising Plans For Hugh Jackman's Wolverine - SPOILERS
Recommended For You:

X-MEN Rumor May Reveal MCU Reboot Team And Surprising Plans For Hugh Jackman's Wolverine - SPOILERS

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4 5 6
Tobuttica
Tobuttica - 5/10/2009, 2:06 AM
Amen. Personally, I enjoyed the X-Men movies. I'm not like a super huge fan, but I read the comics and have seen all the movies and I'll tell ya what I'd like to see. Trask from the 3rd movie develope into a villain and have the Sentinels created to wreak some havoc. Not only that, but how cinematically badass would it be to have Apocalypse show up and tear Angels wings off and force him into the Horsemen. That would be killer. Archangel anyone?
TheMyth
TheMyth - 5/10/2009, 3:33 AM
Thanks Tobuttica. I am a "super huge fan" and have read X-Men for nearly 20 years now. I collect all X-titles and mini-series as well as most individual character spinoffs. I know X-Men. I figure I'd give everyone a chance to get some answers, as I keep hearing the protests and some are honest mistakes that can be overlooked by just not knowing a small portion of their history, but some are almost like they got their X-Men history from the 90's TAS.

Actually, Angels wings were ripped off and he was crucified during the Mutant Massacre by Blockbuster and Harpoon, 2 of Sinisters Marauders. How much more badass would that be to see?!?!
TheMyth
TheMyth - 5/10/2009, 4:14 AM
@joshw24: Costumes fall under the category of things easily fixed. Each new X-Movie gives another opportunity to finally put some color to the team. While Sabertooth wasn't very vocal in X1, there were a few scenes, at least 2, in which it was clear that Sabertooth knew who Wolverine was. An X4 'Mutant Massacre'* could give another chance to bring Sabertooth back into the franchise and allow Liev to play him again(with some added animal features to show his embrace of his inner rage and in keeping with a look that seems progressive) Not every character requires an in depth introduction. Colossus was in X2 and Shadowcat was in all 3(though as a different actress each time) being setup as supporting characters. Your right about the corny climax in X1, but if you remember correctly, X1 is what started this whole modern age of Comic Movies and Fox was taking a chance on something unproven, so naturally they didn't throw piles of money at it, initially. On Magneto, it's time for an X-flic with another antagonist.

In the above paragraph you state how some X-Men didn't get proper introductions in the trilogy, yet in this paragraph, you say X2 didn't introduce enough. It was because of all the time spent developing Nightcrawler and incorporating him into the story that little was left for others, yet in X3, they spare the lengthy involvement to put a few extra's on the team. So which is it bud, not enough introduction or too much?

Everything done in the 3rd film can be fixed in X4. Cyclops and Jean could be brought back, Juggernaut can still be Xaviers step brother, no that was not Blob in the mutant meeting, the cure undone easily, all this and more of X3 can be fixed and by pulling it back into the source material. The Cyke and Jean situation even open a unique opportunity to use another comic story.

I agree, they should have put more time in parallel plot development, setting up new characters. A new villain PLEASE. I don't want to see anymore Magneto. There is a whole pantheon of rogues to battle the X-Men, lets pull them out! Sentinels would have definitely been in X2. Stryker could have just as easily been working with Trask to create Sentinels as opposed to the complicated method he chose.

There is nothing about these films that is so bad they can't be made better by continuing with this continuity. Not to be rude, but I saw the movies as well, lol, the goal of this article is more to explain specific moments in the movies which some fans think deviated from the source when a majority of these occurrence's can either be linked through the source, reigned back to the source, or in some cases didn't deviate at all. Pick an instance or two which you feel were pivotal to the franchise downfall and I will be able to better explain my point.
rockingrich1webb
rockingrich1webb - 5/10/2009, 7:07 AM
Okay I honestly like the X-men franchise but their were so many mistakes they did in the X-men Origins that were honestly stupid like the part where wolverine escapes weapon X, he slices an X in the exit and jumps down a water-fall. While in X-men 2 he had a flash back on him escaping Weapon X with blood all over his body. Then he screams in pain and exits the weapon x facility (with the door undamaged). Next he goes outside and what does he do jump of a water-fall? no he dosen't. This flashback I just said was actually came in hand later on in X2 where they can't find a exit and wolverine guides the way because of this flashback. And then when they exit what do the see a waterfall or a freezing Taiga. Just imagine what would happen to the X-men if the waterfall was their instead of the Taiga. SEE THEY REALLY SCREWED THE MOVIE UP!!!. (But even though I loved the movie I just did this thing because you said you wanted the challenge).
rockingrich1webb
rockingrich1webb - 5/10/2009, 8:26 AM
FIRST OF ALL i'm sure you know not much people would understand that and SECOND OF ALL I admit that mistake about the dream-flashback thing BUT how would he know where the exit was in the first place THIRD OF ALL I may said they screwed up the movie but I enjoyed it.
TheShakeBake
TheShakeBake - 5/10/2009, 9:38 AM
Kinda off the subject but i wish Nightcrawler never left between 2 and 3 even thou i think he did in the comics lol "i think" thats just hopw good of a fan iam lol

See ya, The ShakeBake
gestlmutant
gestlmutant - 5/10/2009, 10:01 AM
Thanks for posting this bud! I'm really relieved that there are true x fans out there who actually get the source material. I'v seen a plethora of reviews crusifying the franchise and bringing up continuity issues that aren't inaccurate at all

for example a self proclaimed die hard x fan wrote a review on cbm where he stated that he had no idea who blob was...blob was big villian for a very long time.

TheMyth
TheMyth - 5/10/2009, 4:27 PM
@Rockingrich1webb: Lansdowne5 took the words straight from my mouth. In regards to people understanding, it isn't a hard concept to grasp. Besides, what happened to all the hoo-ha that the comics don't need to be diluted to be understood by the typical movie going audience?

Gestlmutant: Blob first appeared in Uncanny #3. Xavier wanted him as the 6th X-Man, and has openly expressed regret that he was unable to get Fred to join them. Blob was the 3rd villain the X-Men had to face off against in their long career. Just think, if that person didn't know who Blob was, he certainly would have been lost had they used Mastodon instead(Mastodon is the Weapon X team member who Blob replaces from the comics)

@Pietro: Actually, Blob in origins is far from the biggest mistake of the franchise or in the Wolverine movie for that matter. Blob was never part of Weapon X, but he has been part of another government founded mutant super group, Freedom Force, whose roster consisted of mostly old Brotherhood members. This is where Blob is tied to the movie. You see, not as random as once thought huh.

I have a post above addressing a comment made by joshw24. Apparently he deleted his post, not sure why.
dogchasingcars
dogchasingcars - 5/10/2009, 5:53 PM
Myth i completely agree with you i am a huge fan of the x-men movies, comic and old TV show. the only real beef i have ever had with the x-men movies was some of the cast choices like hallie berry as storm she never did fit te part for me she had the beauty and height but not the voice and my only real beef with x-three besides hallie berry and her too much screen time ,i mean i do know that storm is second in command after scott, but like i said before i hate hallie berry. anyway the only beef i had with x-3 was collosus only having a few lines and not having his russian accent that was actually my only problems.
JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 5/10/2009, 6:14 PM
THEMYTH: hey, I accidently deleted it when i tried to edit it after i noticed all the spelling mistakes....im pissed cos it took me ages to write as well, lol!
HUSoldier
HUSoldier - 5/10/2009, 6:51 PM
HOW CAN GAMBIT HAVE MET WOLVERINE BEFORE THEY WERE IN THE X-MEN? and also how come they had wolverine lose his memory from being shot in the head when (i was pretty sure) he lost his memory just because of his getting the adamantium and all that?
OriginalPhysco
OriginalPhysco - 5/10/2009, 7:34 PM
Go Myth
joob234
joob234 - 5/10/2009, 8:30 PM
what about when magneto and the mutants arive at alcatraz in X3 and its the middle of the day, then a frame changes and its pitch black night and everybodys standing in the same spot???? explain that
TheMyth
TheMyth - 5/10/2009, 8:40 PM
@dogchasingcars: I'm with you on the Colossus deal, basically because he is my second favorite X-Man after Gambit. The accent and screen time issue could easily be addressed in later movies. As far as correcting the accent, they could do it subtly but never as thick because of how he is portrayed in X2 and X3, as he didn't have many lines anyway, nor were they very long. I would liken it to the Colossus who appeared in Astonishing X-Men when it was revealed he was alive after many years of being 'deceased'. I'm glad you recognize this as a personal issue and not as a franchise sinking catastrophe ;)

joshw24: it's cool bud, I once wrote an entire article that I lost before posting cause my Internet crashed. Just so you all know, his post wasn't a pandering retardation, but contained many good points, which is why I replied with such detail.

HUSoldier: Aspects of Gambits own origin were simply condensed into this story, as some events bear striking similarities between the 2 characters. First, on Gambits first mission with the Thieves Guild, he was to accompany and assist his cousin, Etienne, in an effort to steal an item for the 'Tilling' During this mission, Remy and Etienne are captured and Gambit is sent to a mutant slaver and imprisoned (sound familiar to his capture and stay in Strykers lab) While escaping, his cousin was killed(escaping a mutant prison...) Gambit remained with the Guild and was eventually trusted enough to be sent on his first solo mission, to steal a necklace called the Charmers Star, i think it was called. Gambit elects to seduce the items owner, a woman named Genevive(can't remember her last name) in order to get close enough to steal the item. Unbeknownst to Gambit, another party had sent their own agent after the item, the agent was a man named Victor Creed. Victor waited for Gambit to steal the item, then kidnapped Genevive and Henri Marcinieux(a friend of Gambit) and coerced gambit into giving him the item, resulting in the death of Genevive. Gambit was about 21 when this happened, long before he ever met the X-Men. The purpose of that brief was to show while Gambit had never met Wolverine pre X-Men, he did know Sabertooth, quite well actually, and that story is only the first of Gambit and Sabertooths interaction before Gambit joined the X-Men. Want more justification for his link in this movie, how about Wolverine and Gambit's own personal interactions in comics. The two characters are undoubtedly the most popular X-Men in comics, Wolverine being #1 in this I concede. These 2 have always been portrayed as competitive rivals, and while a small level of distrust exists between them, they know one can count on the other in a pinch. The dynamic between the 2 even spawned it's own mini series in the mid-90's called "Wolverine & Gambit: Victims" Point here being, Gambits interaction with Wolverine is as important as his relationship with Rogue, Bishop, or Storm. It's a more personal relationship than with other X-Men, whether a good or bad one.

the adamantium bullet thing sucks, as adamantium is exactly that, indestructible, but not impervious to magnetic forces(this has often been portrayed in the comics) nothing can puncture, break, melt, freeze, or otherwise destroy it once processed then cooled. As for adamantium bullets themselves... they do exist in comics, though more for the purpose of piercing the skin of characters like the Hulk and Luke Cage. While the impact of one on Logans skull from a .44 mag would certainly lay him flat out on his backside, it wouldn't pierce his skull to then ricochet within his braincase, scrambling grey matter like eggs. It has however been shown that this effect applies in the comics and can seriously mess Wolverine up(read World War Hulk when Hulk holds him by his arms and pounds his head til Wolverine looks retarded, Hulk noting this as he beat him, then hurling him into a treeline) but this doesn't effect his memory, just scrambles his mind(literally) for a time. If Stryker had fire a few into Wolverines eye sockets, however, this plot idea becomes somewhat more viable, while certainly not from the source. The reason for his memory loss has been portrayed several ways in comics. Until most recently, it was thought his memory loss was a result of his healing factor. I read just a few weeks ago that Professor Xavier wiped Wolverines memory, as Wolverine tried to kill him when they first met. Wolverine knows this and actually thanked Charles, as it "...gave me a chance to become a Hero." How do you like them apples.
dogchasingcars
dogchasingcars - 5/10/2009, 8:44 PM
easily explained joob bad editing
Betty
Betty - 5/10/2009, 8:57 PM
@joob234--storm did it.lol

I think the problem with the X-franchise is not that so many died in X3 or the discrepancies in wolverine. Its that in order to "fix" what has been done or bring so many back from the dead would be LAME. Can you imagine? Explaining that much in the beginning of a film? It would kill itself.

In comics, characters come back from the dead all the time. The difference is that all those rising dead are spread out through many issues in between.

I want to say it cant be done. Making an X4 in the continuity of the first 3 is not an easy task.
Betty
Betty - 5/10/2009, 9:04 PM
Myth-- Jeez, i know wolverini is tough but how many times can a man have his memory wiped? He's going to end up like memento.

Now that i think about it my memory was wiped many times in college.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 5/10/2009, 9:04 PM
you tell em themyth!
TheMyth
TheMyth - 5/10/2009, 9:07 PM
Pietro: It's aggravating when silly changes are applied to these characters. I don't know why he needed blonde hair instead of brown or why he wasn't a fatass the whole time. Mastodon would have been fine, as we'd never have had to see him again, while Blob is a more recurring X-nemesis, and we may have to see him in the future, thinking to ourselves "remember how he was a muscle man in Wolverine? Bs huh." I will say I was happy with how the fat Blob looked and talked and that it is possible to see him in the future as a fattie. This is something that no character hasn't endured being put in a movie. Some are worse off for it than others.

@joob234: That is a cinematography issue, not a story or history issue, but what the hell... Magneto used his powers to speed the earths rotation via the electromagnetic field ;)

@Betty: your right. I was thinking maybe the X3 Phenix could have been Madelyn Prior, the clone created by Sinister and that Cyclops isn't dead, but instead is in Sinisters possession. It would have to be done carefully, and I personally think character resurrection in movies isn't a great idea and should be careful not to be taken lightly. I just want people to know the possibility to fix it and do so in keeping with the source is there. You are correct about the risky endeavor of an X4. I wish I could write it and it actually be used, but we all know that's a pipe dream. lol, the previous possibilities regarding his memory loss actually circulate what Xavier did and are all a product of Xavier doing this, as well as maintaining a level of mystery to it. Xavier acknowledges this as one of his most inhumane acts, ranking with the treatment of the AI called Danger, and many other things. Momento is a great movie!
Joslezio85
Joslezio85 - 5/10/2009, 10:26 PM
This is a little off subject. But, a buddy of mine is in a deeply intellectual conversation over who he can beat Gambit. His friend is a die hard X-men fan and will not admit to anyone being able to beat gambit. I know your a huge Gambit fan. But, I figured you could have a few names to throw out there. I said Vulcan. I really think he could take him or atleast throw down pretty hardcore against him.
rockingrich1webb
rockingrich1webb - 5/10/2009, 11:17 PM
Okay I just watched X1-3 now and I found another misake. When Wolverine had a X-ray in X-men 1 the bullets were not there. well, myth let's see if you can link that.
rockingrich1webb
rockingrich1webb - 5/10/2009, 11:27 PM
oh was that blue kid who did that tounge thing night crawler and was the kid who tried vibrating very hard quicksilver. (sorry if this is off the subject I just wanted to know)
TheMyth
TheMyth - 5/10/2009, 11:30 PM
@joslezio85: If you take away the hero/villain complex and pit Gambit against just about anyone he would win. There was even a story after Gambit was tried for he Mutant Massacre when an entity named the New Sun appeared for a while, he turned out to be a Gambit from another reality whose powers had grown beyond his control and he had literally burned away every living thing on the planet in his reality. In the mainstream universe, Gambit had actually had to seek out a geneticist to help him dampen his steadily increasing powers. at this time he could charge objects with shear line of sight, but the overflow of kinetic energy would often cause objects in his vacinity to explode without warning. He eventually met Sinister, who performed a procedure on Gambit to dampen his power so that he could control it. This is why Gambit was endebted to Sinister. Gambit at full power is an Omega level mutant capable of complete planetary destruction. Jean Grey, Storm, Jubilee, and Iceman, and potentially Rogue(given her powers of absorption) are also in this status among a few others if they would drop the hero complex and realize their true power. While Vulcan is wildly powerful, he is not powerful enough to individually destroy on such an epic scale. In terms of raw power, while Vulcan is still relatively new and hasn't been established as his brothers, Havok has him beat. I say this because it seems Vulcan has more of an energy manipulation ability rather than manifestation or transmutation, though I can't honestly prove that yet as a lot of information regarding the extent of his abilities just isn't there yet. What makes characters like Vulcan seem so powerful is the villain complex, the disregard for the needs/wants/safety of others and blind ambition to achieve a goal, typically self serving, through any means. Simply put, characters like this embrace their power and relish the use of it, while heroes are more reluctant which makes them weaker in a way.

@dellamorte1872: Iceman is probably one of the most difficult to kill characters in Marvel U, including the likes of DP and Wolverine. If you throw down the gauntlet and both characters are out for the death of the other, Wolverine and Marrow are dead before they take their first step against Gambit, Emma wouldn't last much longer, as his powers make his mind nearly impossible to penetrate, even by psychics as powerful as Professor X and Jean Grey. Iceman and Gambit in a Deathmatch of supreme power, I can't call that one it'd be a toss up.

@rockingrich1webb: Absence of bullets in Logans braincase in X1: They were a foreign element not bonded to his body, therefore his healing factor purged them from his body over the course of several years. That work for you? Regarding young mutants in X-Origins Wolverine: The one bungee strapped in the cage 'vibrating' was indeed Quicksilver. The mutant with a tongue actually had a green tint to his skin and was most probably Toad. Banshee, Riptide, St. Croix twins, and Fever Pitch are other noteables(though Toad and Fever Pitch might not actually be who I think they are)
OriginalPhysco
OriginalPhysco - 5/11/2009, 5:30 AM
Wow thank you Myth, cuz i wouldnt have the energy to read every comment; i barely do, LOL. But some people on CBM dont beleive that Weapon X1 is Wolverine's son Daken, the only one who could kill Wolverine because of his blades
saymekian
saymekian - 5/11/2009, 8:37 AM
I am sorry Myth, did you just put Jubilee in the possible Omega mutants category? I also am a reader from childhood (now 23) and I definitely have to disagree with you there. She is not a "potential" case. Her powers are as powerful as they are going to get. Oh wait, she doesn't have them anymore LOL.

And yes, if Gambit hadn't had his powers dampened he would be one of the most powerful mutants alive. But the whole planet would also have been destroyed most likely, so it wouldn't have mattered. As he is right now, he is middle-tier at best and Wolverine could take him down with almost no trouble.

That page in WWH was one of my favorite moments in comics.

Also, "I came to hear you scream." Classic.

Also, Iceman has been told many times that he has the potential to be the most powerful mutant on the planet. I mean when he shut down Sunfire's powers on the molecular level in Messiah Complex, I had a nerdgasm.

I have enjoyed all the X movies and hope they keep feeding me more.
MetalHead
MetalHead - 5/11/2009, 8:41 AM
Myth,
I only skimmed through the replies (I'll re-read them after this) but I am and have been with you on this FOR THE MOST PART. Here are my few discrepancies, NONE of which make the series dead, in my opinion.

-The Phoenix/Dark Phoenix Saga. This can't be argued as WAY inaccurate, UNLESS something drastically changed in the "Ultimates" universe, which as I have said before I refuse to read because I hate the entire concept-- not just the X-Men Ultimates but all Ultimates.

-SOME of the chronology. Here's my biggest issue: how can they make "First Class" correctly WITHOUT a reboot? (Not saying to reboot it, just saying that it can't be done correctly according to the timeline that they are using.) Throughout the course of the 3 X-films they have established a timeline where (a) Scott & Jean are already X-Men (and FOR THE MOMENT have both already been killed), (b) Iceman is only just becoming a member, (c) Beast already has his hair, and finally (d) Angel has just joined the group. According to this timeline it is not possible to have the hairless Beast, a living Cyclops, a living Marvel Girl (who joined AFTER the other 4 were already members), and Iceman and Angel all members at the same time. SO, my issue ISN'T a prequel, it's calling it "First Class."

-The whole Cyclops death thing annoyed me, BUT it can very easily can be fixed, which I have said how to do several times on here. (We never saw him die, we could find out that Sinister has both Scott and Jean captured and that he made Madelyne Pryor and SHE became The Phoenix.) The same can be said with bringing back Jean and with getting back Magneto's, Rogue's and Mystique's powers. Here is a link to the indepth breakdown of how I would fix these things while staying true to the comic (the posts at the end of the comments section):

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/FalconsNest/news/?a=7206

So for me, my main issue is the chronology, like for example, for Jubilee was apparantly an X-Man BEFORE Angel!!! But those are liberties that I can understand.
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 5/11/2009, 8:50 AM
IF YOUR A REAL X-MEN FAN ; ) YOU KNOW WOLVERINE WAS A LAME A$$ B MOVIE HOLLYWOOD DISASTER OF A TRAIN WRECK!!!

The Actors 10 out of 10!!! ; )
saymekian
saymekian - 5/11/2009, 8:52 AM
At MetalHead
The only people that couldn't be in First Class logically are Iceman and Angel, as they just joined.

Cyclops, Jean, and Beast could definitely be in there though. It would be a PREQUEL, meaning Jean and Scott aren't dead yet. Beast wouldn' have his second mutation yet into...a beast.

And if you watch closely, Hank McCoy is actually in X2 on the television - sans fur.
Johno
Johno - 5/11/2009, 9:18 AM
Is it possible/legal age wise for Gambit and Rogue to get it on in a possible X4?
TucsonRican
TucsonRican - 5/11/2009, 9:19 AM
I think they will put Storm in the First Class movie. The trilogy set it up that she's been at the mansion, forever...
TheMyth
TheMyth - 5/11/2009, 9:33 AM
Actually Reco, Weapon XI in the comics is quite a mystery. The best bet honestly is that XI is a clone of Deadpool. Daken has no ties whatsoever to Weapon Plus programs, but is the bastard son of Wolverine and Mariko Yashida.

@saymekian: Yes, Jubilee is a potential Omega level, and I was as surprised as you to learn this, but it is true. Although she did lose her powers on M-Day, when she had them, she could detonate matter on a subatomic level... like a hydrogen bomb. Like many heroes, she never realized her whole potential. It was during her time with Generation X that this was revealed. Emma Frost noted her as one of the most potentially powerful mutants in existence. You are spot on with Iceman which is why I said a Gambit vs. Iceman deathmatch would effectively be a toss up. Bobby Drake is quite literally a God.
namor1781
namor1781 - 5/11/2009, 9:33 AM
i like the movies too for the most part, but what about this x men first class movie i hear about, a young cyclops, beast, and jean grey, what about iceman and angel?? they introduced the xmen at wrong times, making some younger than others even though in the comic they had been around the longest. Since they already screwed that up and there is no logical way to fix it, they shouldnt do anymore prequals, make a part 4 and go huge, do the age of apacolypse story, see angel become arcangel, more colossus, bring back nightcrawler, see iceman really use his powers, building bridges in frozen state, introduce bishop and cable, and i know it probably doesnt translate over to film very well, but i know alot of the die hard fans would like to see wolerine in costume just once! maybe change the colors or something.
Shadowelfz
Shadowelfz - 5/11/2009, 9:44 AM
Good job keeping the faith, Myth.

What these 'true' comic fans fail to realize is that there are fourty plus years of X-MEN comics to draw from, including multiple series each with their own characters and story arcs. In order to 'keep it true to the comics,' they would have to follow the evolution of the X-Men through the comics. This would require an extrodinary amount of movies to keep it all together. Since Wolvie, Storm, Colossus and other fan favs didnt join until the early eighties (dont quote me on that), we would have to sit though dozens of x men movies to get to them, and then dozens more to get to Gambit and others. I dont think anyone, hollywood or fan alike, is that patient so the writers ADAPT the characters to the big screen. It requires writing an original story to accomodate that, or just start of the Ultimate X Men line (don't even start LEEE.... ;))

As for the movies themselves, you can hate individual parts of it (like the Barakapool thing), but you can't hate on characters for not keeping close to their counterpart.
Shadowelfz
Shadowelfz - 5/11/2009, 9:47 AM
Oh and yes, Watchman did it (to a degree), but Watchman was part of a limited run that fit nicely in a single graphic novel, so you cant apply that to more established comics like X-Men.
1 2 3 4 5 6
View Recorder