SDCC '14: One Of Ultron's Drones From AVENGERS: AGE OF ULTRON?

Wasn't this posted already?

Sweet! looks like from the comics.

I WANT TO SEE SOME FOOTAGE NOW!!!!!!!

perfect

C'mon Baby! WE WANT THE TRAILER!

Show us the damn footage MARVEL!!

No one has the footage shown at comic con? I wanna see a trailer or something!!!

No need to complain about drones, because if they didn't have Robot Drones as enemies they'd do Aliens again.

I rather have the drones.

Why you ask? BECAUSE THEY DON'T NEED TO HOLD BACK ON THE POWERS AND VIOLENCE VS SOME NON HUMAN ENEMIES. They can show them getting ripped and torn apart by the Hulk, blown up by Iron Man's laser and missiles, Thor can burn them and electrocute them, and Cap could shield bash the crap out of them and could probably use a gun on these things without any backlash from fans.

If you give them anything sentient that can bleed or literally die and cause damage, you'd get the MoS complaint of "too much destruction" and "too much death".

And if they held back to not cause casualty or damage, you'd get complaints about "blah blah they nerfed Thor and Hulk" and "Captain America should've shot that guy in Avengers".

SMH, there's no pleasing people.

@AontheheadSharontheChest

Epic mic drop, sir. Loved everything you said.

Yes!! Perfect.

UH OH

Lol @nail. I think that Wilding's article was only for suggestions on how to make better articles. And if I'm not mistaken, although the article definitely stated that "a few guidelines which you have to meet in order to not have your article deleted", I believe the previous poster had all of the listed guidelines: aka, a good headline and a hooking premise in the teaser text. Basically, it was only the thumbnail image that wasn't exactly "appropriate for the site" by being somewhat blurry.

And still, in any case, when did an editor's article become law? When did Wilding's recent article become the zenith in say as to which articles (probably mostly focused on the news scoops) should be deleted. Let's, say, I make an article, but the teaser image happens to be shrunk down to 61x60 size instead of 60x60. Should you really have authority to delete it, and then post it under your won account. If I'm not mistaken, I thought that the editors were always supposed to give a warning to the first poster on what they need to fix, giving them some time in the process, of course, before deleting an already well made article. And if the user happens to be away from the site from some time, don't the editors have the authority to go into the other person's articles and fix, say, the teaser image, as I remember they used to. :P

Also, not everyone has even read Wilding's article, either refusing to read an article that they don't want to, or perhaps take a break from the news on this site for a day or so. So, technically, the previous posted article on this news WASsort of a correctly made article to the original poster, who may or may not (should I refrain from asking) have read Wilding's 101 article-- in this probable scenario most likely did not-- to fully understand concepts on what to include in a proper article. If he had, then I guess it would somewhat be appropriate to delete his/her article IF, and that's a big IF Wilding's article IS (which it is not, as you, in contrast, claim to be) the "base of operations" on how an article should appear. If it is, then why not make it official (as the site admins have not)(I am unaware if the admins are aware of wildings 101 articles being the new law, however, and can not prove otherwise, so i therefore, should not extensively be accounted for by saying this) by say, sending the article as a message to all the old users as MANDATORY TO READ and also making new users to agree to the "101" terms before making an account.

And in conclusions, I would like to state that although I should be unaccounted for for whatever the other poster "did wrong", that maybe they are bummed out because they worked really hard on finding that news scoop. So, although I am neither blaming you, nail, for doing anything "wrong" (on the deletion) either, or am I actually being entirely sarcastic in this response, I conclude my insight on this case, since I am indubitibly scared for whether all my news articles will "make the cut", according to Wilding's premises on how to make GOOD articles. I didn't mean to ramble, but rather share my insight.
;P

So beautiful.
Looks straight out of a comic book. Glorious.

It looks a litte bit like a Spartan helmet if you imagen you have your face in that mouth.