John Barrowman Talks FAN EXPO San Francisco, ARROW, DOCTOR WHO Return, TORCHWOOD's Legacy, & More (Exclusive)

John Barrowman Talks FAN EXPO San Francisco, ARROW, DOCTOR WHO Return, TORCHWOOD's Legacy, & More (Exclusive)

Comic-Con In Crisis As Lucasfilm, Netflix, Sony, HBO And More Join Marvel In Skipping Annual Fan-Fest
Recommended For You:

Comic-Con In Crisis As Lucasfilm, Netflix, Sony, HBO And More Join Marvel In Skipping Annual Fan-Fest

DISCLAIMER: is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE], and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
staypuffed - 7/28/2014, 11:52 PM
Wasn't this posted already?
solidsnakeeyes - 7/28/2014, 11:53 PM
Sweet! looks like from the comics.
solidsnakeeyes - 7/28/2014, 11:54 PM
I wanna see some leak footage from Age of Ultron and Ant-Man. Whoever got it, please post the got damn video!
JimFiser - 7/28/2014, 11:58 PM
The face is completely different then the ones on the posters.. Could be the actual ultron
BrowniesExplode - 7/28/2014, 11:59 PM
staypuffed - 7/28/2014, 11:59 PM
Ah, okay. Didn't even notice this was you, nail!
AbrahamErskine - 7/29/2014, 12:00 AM
patrat18 - 7/29/2014, 12:00 AM
TAL0IV - 7/29/2014, 12:02 AM
Hey everyone (: new guy here, I've been going to this site for years and finally decided to join you, btw some of your guys threads are hilarious haha look forward to joining the gang
ferkinghulk - 7/29/2014, 12:02 AM
AstonishingArachnid - 7/29/2014, 12:04 AM
@Pending If it was made to promote Rage of Ultron why would it be with the props from Age of Ultron?
joniegogo84 - 7/29/2014, 12:04 AM
Show us the damn footage MARVEL!!
cyns - 7/29/2014, 12:12 AM
It looks incomplete to me. I wonder if they're going to do some CGI work on it when they get to post.
DavidChen26 - 7/29/2014, 12:12 AM
No one has the footage shown at comic con? I wanna see a trailer or something!!!
GLprime2814 - 7/29/2014, 12:13 AM
Got it ultrons in it now show something different like oh I don't know THE VISION!!
AontheheadStarontheChest - 7/29/2014, 12:17 AM
No need to complain about drones, because if they didn't have Robot Drones as enemies they'd do Aliens again.

I rather have the drones.

Why you ask? BECAUSE THEY DON'T NEED TO HOLD BACK ON THE POWERS AND VIOLENCE VS SOME NON HUMAN ENEMIES. They can show them getting ripped and torn apart by the Hulk, blown up by Iron Man's laser and missiles, Thor can burn them and electrocute them, and Cap could shield bash the crap out of them and could probably use a gun on these things without any backlash from fans.

If you give them anything sentient that can bleed or literally die and cause damage, you'd get the MoS complaint of "too much destruction" and "too much death".

And if they held back to not cause casualty or damage, you'd get complaints about "blah blah they nerfed Thor and Hulk" and "Captain America should've shot that guy in Avengers".

SMH, there's no pleasing people.

matthuliz - 7/29/2014, 12:21 AM
This movie needs The Thing to make it more laughable!!!


Oh, its on FOX which makes equally funny CBMs!
Earthbound - 7/29/2014, 12:28 AM

Epic mic drop, sir. Loved everything you said.
StrangeBatch - 7/29/2014, 12:33 AM
Yes!! Perfect.
RamonSuarez - 7/29/2014, 12:35 AM
"If you give them anything sentient that can bleed or literally die and cause damage, you'd get the MoS complaint of "too much destruction" and "too much death".

You totally missed the point of the MOS complaints. It wasn't the human element but the casual disregard for life.
NeoBaggins - 7/29/2014, 12:36 AM

FrankBerzerk - 7/29/2014, 12:38 AM
This one here is directly come out of comic book cover
JFerguson - 7/29/2014, 12:46 AM
Lol @nail. I think that Wilding's article was only for suggestions on how to make better articles. And if I'm not mistaken, although the article definitely stated that "a few guidelines which you have to meet in order to not have your article deleted", I believe the previous poster had all of the listed guidelines: aka, a good headline and a hooking premise in the teaser text. Basically, it was only the thumbnail image that wasn't exactly "appropriate for the site" by being somewhat blurry.

And still, in any case, when did an editor's article become law? When did Wilding's recent article become the zenith in say as to which articles (probably mostly focused on the news scoops) should be deleted. Let's, say, I make an article, but the teaser image happens to be shrunk down to 61x60 size instead of 60x60. Should you really have authority to delete it, and then post it under your won account. If I'm not mistaken, I thought that the editors were always supposed to give a warning to the first poster on what they need to fix, giving them some time in the process, of course, before deleting an already well made article. And if the user happens to be away from the site from some time, don't the editors have the authority to go into the other person's articles and fix, say, the teaser image, as I remember they used to. :P

Also, not everyone has even read Wilding's article, either refusing to read an article that they don't want to, or perhaps take a break from the news on this site for a day or so. So, technically, the previous posted article on this news WASsort of a correctly made article to the original poster, who may or may not (should I refrain from asking) have read Wilding's 101 article-- in this probable scenario most likely did not-- to fully understand concepts on what to include in a proper article. If he had, then I guess it would somewhat be appropriate to delete his/her article IF, and that's a big IF Wilding's article IS (which it is not, as you, in contrast, claim to be) the "base of operations" on how an article should appear. If it is, then why not make it official (as the site admins have not)(I am unaware if the admins are aware of wildings 101 articles being the new law, however, and can not prove otherwise, so i therefore, should not extensively be accounted for by saying this) by say, sending the article as a message to all the old users as MANDATORY TO READ and also making new users to agree to the "101" terms before making an account.

And in conclusions, I would like to state that although I should be unaccounted for for whatever the other poster "did wrong", that maybe they are bummed out because they worked really hard on finding that news scoop. So, although I am neither blaming you, nail, for doing anything "wrong" (on the deletion) either, or am I actually being entirely sarcastic in this response, I conclude my insight on this case, since I am indubitibly scared for whether all my news articles will "make the cut", according to Wilding's premises on how to make GOOD articles. I didn't mean to ramble, but rather share my insight.
Fidolemuet - 7/29/2014, 12:52 AM
Looks more like the actual Ultron than a Ultron drone to me...
LittleDanglyThing - 7/29/2014, 12:56 AM
So beautiful.
Looks straight out of a comic book. Glorious.
MakluIV - 7/29/2014, 1:02 AM
Whedon said there would be different forms to Ultron. This is either one of Ultron's drones or one of Ultron's forms. Either way, it' perfection. Age of Ultron will be epic!
SnapperCarr - 7/29/2014, 1:33 AM
AlexLaChiusa - 7/29/2014, 1:37 AM
Sorry but I still think this is fake/fan made. When you compare it to the other props that we have seen from the film, this looks VERY cheap and amateurish.
Floke - 7/29/2014, 1:38 AM
It looks a litte bit like a Spartan helmet if you imagen you have your face in that mouth.
Cartoon22 - 7/29/2014, 1:39 AM
I hope this is the final form of Ultron that face emotionless is so evil so heartless and cold
Gnoxorm - 7/29/2014, 1:44 AM
Meh the armors for these Marvel films. Iron Man, Thors Armor, they all look cheap and fake. And any body suit just looks like a rip off of Iron Man, including these. I'm sure Ant-Man will be just the same.
1 2
View Recorder