THE FANTASTIC FOUR Spoilers: Everything Revealed In Set Photos...Including Who's Wearing The Thing's "Suit"

THE FANTASTIC FOUR Spoilers: Everything Revealed In Set Photos...Including Who's Wearing The Thing's "Suit"

Work has begun on The Fantastic Four: First Steps and we're now rounding up all the earliest reveals to explore what those tell us about the long-awaited debut of Marvel's First Family in the MCU...

Feature Opinion
By JoshWilding - Aug 29, 2024 12:08 PM EST
Filed Under: Fantastic Four

Marvel Studios' long-awaited reboot of the Fantastic Four franchise, titled The Fantastic Four: First Steps, finally arrives in theaters next summer. First announced at Comic-Con in 2019, it's been a long time coming for fans of Marvel's First Family.

An impressive cast has since been assembled for a movie which promises to have major implications for the wider MCU as we head into the next Avengers movies. Production recently began in the UK, bringing an early wave of surprisingly revealing set photos. 

By far the biggest talking point so far is, of course, our first look at The Thing. In this feature, we share a new shot of that practical costume (which confirms there is indeed someone wearing the suit) after taking a deep dive into everything else we've spotted in recent weeks.

You can take a look through this fantastic feature by clicking on the "Next"/"View List" buttons below. 
 

5. Sue Storm And Franklin Richards

Pwecxgn0 o

Vanessa Kirby's Invisible Woman was spotted from afar holding a baby who many fans are convinced is the young Franklin Richards. However, one overlooked possibility is it's his sister Valeria. 

Given what we've heard about Galactus wanting Franklin (perhaps as a result of his ability to warp reality and create new dimensions), it makes more sense for him to be a child rather than a baby when we first encounter Marvel's First Family in the MCU.

Regardless, photos and footage showed Sue seemingly lying down with her child as she levitates in the air. Without context, it was impossible to say what was happening but this has to be Franklin or Valeria. 

With Incursions taking place and the Multiverse in peril, the former could be key to Avengers: Doomsday and Avengers: Secret Wars.
 

4. NY❤️FF

Bcaq78jd o

Marvel Studios hasn't really explored the "celebrity" side of superhero culture in the MCU and, unlike The Avengers and X-Men, the Fantastic Four is typically universally loved by the public in the comics. 

One set spotted from a distance revealed an artsy statue that's been created which depicts all four members of the team. 

The leaked trailer hinted at the heroes being public figures, with The Thing appearing on a dating show and Reed Richards hosting what seemed to be his own educational TV show. With that in mind, the foursome having a statue dedicated to them isn't exactly a huge shocker. 

Since it was first revealed, speculation has run rampant that Alicia Masters, Ben Grimm's blind love interest who is also a talented sculptor, might be the artist responsible for creating it. 
 

3. The Excelsior Launch Pad

O3kadtcf o

At Comic-Con, Marvel Studios handed out New York City maps which revealed that, right next to the Baxter Building is the Excelsior Launch Pad. 

Surprisingly, an entire practical version of this massive set has been constructed, suggesting it will play a significant role in the movie (we'd typically anticipate a space like this to be extended and created with visual effects). 

The team's logo is front and centre so this is almost certainly where we see them take flight in the Fantasticar or even a rocket that transports them into the cosmos to confront Galactus. 

If you're curious to learn what else is on that map - including a big Mole Man tease - then you can check it out by clicking here.
 

2. Times Square And A Nod To WandaVision

Iah94upo o

The Fantastic Four: First Steps takes place in a parallel reality and a New York City that, even in the 1960s, is far beyond even today's Big Apple. 

Footage of the set hints at that yet still keeps a retro aesthetic which promises to make this movie unlike anything else we've seen in the MCU before. It's a ballsy move and one that's left us wondering how the heroes will fit in on Earth-616.

While time (no pun intended) will tell on that front, we need to point out a rather brilliant nod to WandaVision. Director Matt Shakman previously worked on the critically acclaimed Disney+ series and there's a store on set called "Westview Appliances Television."

All signs also point to us paying a visit to Ben Grimm's old stomping grounds: Yancy St.!
 

1. The Thing

Fwzumbki o

Talking of the Ever-Lovin' Blue-Eyed Thing, yesterday evening saw us treated to a first look at the character on The Fantastic Four: First Steps set.

We'd expected him to be a fully CG creation; instead, a practical suit is being used similar to when Michael Chiklis played the character in the 2005 and 2007 movies. Of course, this doesn't necessarily mean the version we see on screen next year will be 100% practical. 

Chances are Marvel Studios is using this Thing suit as a reference point for other actors and to help VFX artists light the character in a way that makes him look as incredible on screen as The Hulk and Thanos. 

We're a little shocked it's not just Ebon Moss-Bachrach in mo-cap suit, to be honest, and a newly surfaced image has confirmed it's a double or stunt performer wearing this suit. Marvel Studios knows what it's doing, though, and there's sure to be a good reason for this practical Thing... 

THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS Set Video Reveals First Look At The Thing...And He's Entirely Practical!
Related:

THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS Set Video Reveals First Look At The Thing...And He's Entirely Practical!

THE ACOLYTE Star Amandla Stenberg Says Cancellation Wasn't A Huge Shock Amid Rampage Of Vitriol
Recommended For You:

THE ACOLYTE Star Amandla Stenberg Says Cancellation Wasn't "A Huge Shock" Amid "Rampage Of Vitriol"

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Apophis71
Apophis71 - 8/29/2024, 12:17 PM
As it is a stunt double/stand-in impossible to say it won't be 100% mocap as certainly will only be for lighting references at first (would they even put a mask on the guy otherwise). Even if practical it won't be a one piece mask like that so although it looks good for a halloween mask for Thing we can't REALY judge much from it other than a general idea of the path they are going down with the design.
Malatrova15
Malatrova15 - 8/29/2024, 12:18 PM
Just renew the acolyte disney
McMurdo
McMurdo - 8/29/2024, 12:23 PM
@Malatrova15 - Don't be a bigot.
Malatrova15
Malatrova15 - 8/29/2024, 12:58 PM
@McMurdo - but i need a personality ! 😡
Mixedsuperman
Mixedsuperman - 8/29/2024, 12:25 PM
Are we sure it was a stunt double? It looked like a statue / mannequin to me.
FinnishDude
FinnishDude - 8/29/2024, 12:27 PM
I would almost bet real money on that Thing suit being more of an on-set reference than anything else and a lot of people will be mad that they "replaced" the "practical effect" with CGI, once we start seeing more (nearly) finished footage.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 8/29/2024, 12:29 PM
@FinnishDude - they're going to enhance the practical, ya know how you're actually supposed to use cgi? Saves time and money. Something they desperately need
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 8/29/2024, 1:07 PM
@FinnishDude - I'd argue all day that top quality mocap is hands down better, faster and these days cheaper than practical or prosthetic/CGI mix and to the point where we wouldn't spot it WASN'T fully practical in many cases if we weren't told/shown with BTS images etc...

...also easier to fix if feedback from early screenings isn't good...

...course the issue is when the end result isn't good, be that bad full CGI or BAD prosthetics with or without touch ups in post.

Ultimately if the end result looks great why do any care how they got there to make it look great, including TBH if it blows up the budget cos not our money. Although saying that do need to rein in budgets to give greater chance of profit as too much loosing money reduces chances of future films in the franchise. Below $200M for solo's I'd say and in some cases down to $150M as most of them won't make D&W money so expected BO should be more like $600M the way overall ticket sales have been post pandemic. Those $250M or more budgets feel only makes sense for the big event Avengers team up films fiscally speaking.
FinnishDude
FinnishDude - 8/29/2024, 2:00 PM
@Apophis71 - For me, it comes down to what kind of creature we are talking about. Something like the Hulk or the more realistic/less evolved apes from the rebooted Planet of the Apes movies make sense to be mo-cap CGI, because you can't really make a practical suit that looks like that, have a real person wear it and move in a way that looks real/smooth. On the other hand, something more humanoid and "human-shaped", like the Creature from the Black Lagoon (or the various pastiches like Abe Sabien and The Amphibian Man) or Predator should be done at least partially practically, because there's just something about a real-life texture the CGI just can't replicate and all the actors playing humans can generally speaking give a better performance, when seeing something real in front of them.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 8/29/2024, 2:09 PM
@FinnishDude - For sure, does depend a lot on what kind of creature and can't think of a way a fully practical Thing would ever work well in the modern era, Hulk is easier than a rock face to pull off and they are seemingly going with more bulk in a source accurate way than would permit free movement in action scenes (heck that much bulk even walking or trying to pick anything up). When used well with enough time given to the FX teams (and actors can get a real time look at what they will roughly look like to work with too) we are at a point where CGI CAN feel as tactile as practical and can feel more realistic too. Trouble has oft been not enough time and resources to utilise the tech to peak levels in too many cases.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 8/29/2024, 12:28 PM
The best thing about this movie is the practical sets and the fact that Grimm isn't an entire cgi creation. That POS last movie proved it. If you're gonna spend 250 million on a [frick]ing movie, you might as well BUILD IT. Good job so far, still don't understand why the first introduction to this team is multiverse shenanigans. At least they're doing the origin story properly
ShimmyShimmyYA
ShimmyShimmyYA - 8/29/2024, 12:33 PM
@bobevanz - crazy how much execs got away with money laundering by blowing these budgets out the water to just use all cgi and green screen no sets
RedFury
RedFury - 8/29/2024, 12:33 PM
I get the vibe that The Thing we see in that video is a stand in/reference for CGI.

Just judging by how static the hands, and face look it doesn't scream on set costume to me. That little video shows you how far away the actors hands are from the thing gloves they put on him. If this was supposed to be a practical costume, It would be far more complex than the mascot style one he seems to be wearing. I could be wrong, but I don't think it'll be practical like this.
McMurdo
McMurdo - 8/29/2024, 1:26 PM
@RedFury - zero chance it isn't a stand in for behind the back shots. It would look poor without CGI on film.
WEAPONXOXOXO
WEAPONXOXOXO - 8/29/2024, 12:40 PM
User Comment Image
soberchimera
soberchimera - 8/29/2024, 12:42 PM
Marvel Studios hasn't really explored the "celebrity" side of superhero culture in the MCU and, unlike The Avengers and X-Men, the Fantastic Four is typically universally loved by the public in the comics.
Did you not watch any of the Iron Man movies? And The Avengers are beloved by the public in both the comics and movies. It's the X-Men, Hulk, and Spider-Man who've historically been outcasts and untrusted.
CharlesLeeRay
CharlesLeeRay - 8/29/2024, 12:45 PM
I love the proportion of the body. Those shoulders are massive. One aspect I hated about the 2005 version is the suit the actor wore was just proportional of his own body, he looked so tiny.
FireandBlood
FireandBlood - 8/29/2024, 12:57 PM
“Marvel Studios hasn't really explored the "celebrity" side of superhero culture in the MCU”

User Comment Image
Matchesz
Matchesz - 8/29/2024, 1:04 PM
@FireandBlood - User Comment Image
BlackStar25
BlackStar25 - 8/29/2024, 1:26 PM
@FireandBlood -

User Comment Image
RolandD
RolandD - 8/29/2024, 2:12 PM
@FireandBlood - Also the montage at the end of Avengers with the woman from the bank(?) being interviewed about Cap, a guy getting a beard trim to look like Stark, etc.

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder