Jolt17 Reviews: GHOST RIDER: SPIRIT OF VENGEANCE 3D

Jolt17 Reviews: GHOST RIDER: SPIRIT OF VENGEANCE 3D

Make the jump and check out my spoiler-free take on the newly released adaptation of the Marvel Comics character, Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance.

Review Opinion
By Jolt17 - Feb 17, 2012 07:02 AM EST
Filed Under: Ghost Rider

The embargo for the reviews has recently been lifted, and with that, earlier today we saw the release of the first reviews for Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance. Clearly they give the movie quite a hard time, but does it really deserve it?



Johnny Blaze, still struggling with the curse of being the Ghost Rider, is hiding out in a remote part of Eastern Europe when a secret sect of the church asks him to save a boy from the devil. At first Johnny is reluctant to use his power, but it's the only way to save the boy and possibly rid himself of this curse forever.


The common expectation for this movie, I believe is for it to be a mindless fun, bad ass type of a movie; complete with crazy action scenes, et cetera. Many do not expect the movie to have a story that actually matters much. Well, I am sorry to disappoint, but if you're going to see this movie with the hope of fulfilling that kind of expectation, you better change your mind! In fact, the movie spends most of its time with the characters interacting one with another, trying to make themselves feel necessary (while they really are not). The action scenes themselves rarely appear; and when they do, they are rather short, unexciting..far from entertaining. On the other hand, David S. Goyer manages to craft a rather intriguing story. Unfortunately, it's just delivered badly thanks to the poorly-written script and the bland performances from the actors. At some points, visual narratives are also featured, mainly to tell flashbacks. This device, however, does not work well, as the visuals presented are not enjoyable, while the narrations are not delivered finely, either. Combine them with the misplaced humor, the potential plot ends up being a rather awful one.

As I've mentioned before, the performances from the actors aren't good, and the characters are so badly written we can barely feel them. There is scarcely any development for any of the characters, and other than the main players it seems that the supporting characters are just thrown in there for no reason whatsoever. Reprising his role from the first movie is Nicholas Cage (which is the only thing this movie and its predecessor share in common), portraying the main protagonist, Johnny Blaze. The way he breaths life into Blaze doesn't differ much from the first movie; but he actually seems to have grown slightly more eccentric. That being said, he still doesn't fit the role, nor does he attempt to make the audiences change their minds about it. To my own surprise, even an actor like Idris Elba, who has become a fan favorite thanks to his usually outstanding acting skills does not even stand out in it! Well, he may still be the best out of the rest of the cast, but during the first half of the movie, his performance falls short. And although he gradually improves as the movie goes on, this definitely isn't his best performance. Another character I'd like to talk about here is Carrigan - you may be more familiar with his alter ego, the villain Blackout - portrayed by Johnny Whitworth. Other than in Limitless (in which he acted well as a supporting character), I honestly have never seen the actor's performance in any other movie; but I can tell that his performance in this movie is horrible, especially to fill the role of the 'main' antagonist. (I have to put the quotation marks there, because in the end, the character doesn't seem to serve that purpose well.)



The portrayal of the 'main' villain is one of the movie's biggest failures.
Okay, the movie is not all bad - although sadly, I only have one good point about the movie which actually doesn't affect the overall result that much, either. What is it? The special effects! Several scenes involving Ghost Rider himself are impressive. The rendering of the character is definitely an improvement from the first movie, as it now looks far smoother, more natural, and works better in motion; aside from the design of the character which is also more effective rather than the one used in the previous movie. It is sad to say that even this one aspect is not always good. As I've mentioned before, the visual narratives do not present visuals that are pleasing to see, and besides that, several minor bits such as the movement of Ghost Rider's chains and Blackout's powers occasionally look cheap.



The special effect is an improvement from the first movie.
Last but not least; let's not forget about the 3D. Sadly, the fact is the 3D itself is forgettable! I don't usually go to see movies in 3D, and I have to admit that the technology is used well in around the first five minutes of the movie as well as a few bits near the end. However, during the rest of the movie, I even forgot that I was watching it in 3D. In short, try to avoid this version; unless you are left with no other option (if you're still going to see the movie anyway).


Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance fails in pretty much every aspect, and with that, it doesn't manage to bring any improvement to the franchise. Instead, it succeeds in making its mediocre predecessor look better.




RUMOR: GHOST RIDER Star Nicolas Cage Now Said To Be In Final Talks To Return As The Spirit Of Vengeance
Related:

RUMOR: GHOST RIDER Star Nicolas Cage Now Said To Be In "Final Talks" To Return As The Spirit Of Vengeance

Marvel Television Executive Hopes To Bring GHOST RIDER To TV...But Not The Johnny Blaze Version!
Recommended For You:

Marvel Television Executive Hopes To Bring GHOST RIDER To TV...But Not The Johnny Blaze Version!

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
NerdyGeek
NerdyGeek - 2/17/2012, 8:14 AM
Best review I've seen so far on CBM. Great job!
Polygame
Polygame - 2/17/2012, 8:22 AM
I'd like to know seriously : How do you compare the movie? Jonah Hex bad, catwoman bad, green lantern bad or superman return bad?
VenomIsOnMyRibs
VenomIsOnMyRibs - 2/17/2012, 8:34 AM
I'm convinced people just decide they want to hate this movie because they have some unexplained bias towards Mr. Cage. The man is an awesome actor and has given us some fantastic movies and a few stinkers (i.e The Sorcerer's Apprentice). If you were someone who didn't like the first Ghost Rider, that's understandable it was very hit or miss. Spirit of Vengeance was a huge improvement! Demons, fire, flaming skull/demon/insane gear head, drunk gun totting monk (Idris Ilba), the over the top story telling of the director's that gave us Crank 1 and 2; have you any testicles? So what the villain was a bit cheesy,did you see the first movie? Those villains completely sucked, and what spotty special effect I assume you're speaking of the ending fight scene on the hood of the SUV where it looks grainy and distorted; its meant to look like that. Look at Ghost Rider comics, they're not really "deep" anyway. They are to exemplify badassery, insanity, and a little bit of cheese ball humor. I saw the movie last night as well and absolutely loved it. "Oh well your standards must be low", "You don't know good acting", "Nic Cage sucks man, jump on the bandwagon with us". No! I did not go to this movie expecting to see an Academy Award winning performance. This movie is not attempting to win any awards. This movie is about fun, pure badass, fire pissing, Nic Cage crazy fun.
Jolt17
Jolt17 - 2/17/2012, 8:36 AM
Polygame: First off, I've never seen Jonah Hex and Catwoman before, so I can't tell! Green Lantern and Superman Returns I think were still better than this one, that's all I can say. :) No, it's not as bad as Batman & Robin, though.
Destroyer14
Destroyer14 - 2/17/2012, 8:47 AM
Great review Jolt! Still really looking forward to it.
GUNSMITH
GUNSMITH - 2/17/2012, 8:52 AM
THE BAD SCALE

CATWOMAN BAD=TAKING WHAT YOU LOVE AND CHANGING EVERYTHING.

GREEN LANTERN BAD=GIVING YOU "OK EFFECTS"" BUT FOR SOME REASON IT JUST FAILS

SUPERMAN RETURNS BAD= EMO AND BORING.
fadersdream
fadersdream - 2/17/2012, 9:06 AM
@GUNSMITH
AKA Catwoman = using the name of the character but making a movie about something else entirely. Like that 80's he man movie.
drfate
drfate - 2/17/2012, 9:14 AM
guess I'll be sneaking in to see this one!
Lilvic92
Lilvic92 - 2/17/2012, 9:17 AM
I'm in NO way racist, but one thing that does annoy me is when a comic character is a certain race (black, cascasian, whatever the case may be) and in the movie they're a completely different race.

Daredevil - Black Kingpin
Catwoman - Mixed Catwoman ( I think Halle Berry is mixed)
Heimdall is a pass because he wasn't much of a main character and Idris Elba is a really good actor.

Next thing we know, Black Panther is gonna be potrayed by Eminem..
RealDCGuy
RealDCGuy - 2/17/2012, 9:20 AM
Called it. This movie did suck. Nic Cage is a great actor but here he didnt seem that he was interesting. Action was fun but entire plot is in itself too weak, but kudos to major improvement in SFX department here. The villains were actually really bland and didnt feel threatening enough to pose a threat. On johny blaze himself...... He's weird.......
ruckus73
ruckus73 - 2/17/2012, 9:20 AM
I'll see this anyway, and just keep in the back of my mind that the worse it is the better the chances of the rights going back to Marvel, the the closer we get to ta Marvel Kinghts type of movie.
drfate
drfate - 2/17/2012, 9:20 AM
haven't you noticed that the majority of Comic book movies suck?

they're cheap fun and sometimes they make money.

The best CBM by far is The Incredible Hulk. (Superman 2 is a close second)
The best CBM series is Nolan's Batman.
ManofSteel23
ManofSteel23 - 2/17/2012, 9:22 AM
Yeah I should of read this before commenting on the other article saying I want to see it for the effects,but if you dont see the effects very long then [frick] this film
JaxIV
JaxIV - 2/17/2012, 9:28 AM
I remember a time when all we had was Dolph Lundgren's 1989 Punisher , and anything DC/Warner made was cinematic gold . You kids just dont know how good you've got it . I feel fortunate just to see Ghost Rider make it to the silver screen , let alone a sequel . Long the Marvel Cinematic Universe !
Polygame
Polygame - 2/17/2012, 9:35 AM
Thanks a lot, it is very much enlighting! I did found the first one suprising (didn't know the character then)so I think I will go watch it..at least for the special FX.
LokiTrickskin
LokiTrickskin - 2/17/2012, 9:41 AM
VenomIsOnMyRibs and JonathanisMagnum1985 equal truth. I can't agree more. Freaking band-wagon sheep farts always hating on Cage. They all probably own Limp Bizkit CD's and now claim that they hate Limp Bizkit because that band is not "in" anymore...
Genaro
Genaro - 2/17/2012, 10:04 AM
what trailers appeared with the movie.
satanors
satanors - 2/17/2012, 10:25 AM
So NC raped flamehead.... again. What else is new?
marvel72
marvel72 - 2/17/2012, 10:42 AM
download it is then.
thunderforce
thunderforce - 2/17/2012, 10:45 AM
Marvel needs the rights back please .
continuezero
continuezero - 2/17/2012, 10:49 AM
Back to Marvel you go Ghostrider!!! Hopefully you make it back there in time for Avengers 2.
continuezero
continuezero - 2/17/2012, 10:51 AM
AND Anyone that is trying to claim Nic Cage is a great actor needs to give their head a shake. He's a terrible actor that has shown steady decline in his career and has not made a good movie since he stole 50 cars in 72 hours.
CBArtist
CBArtist - 2/17/2012, 10:53 AM
Just like every other CBM this year, I'll wait and rent it.
Ceejay
Ceejay - 2/17/2012, 10:58 AM
What's with this, "People hate on Nicholas Cage so they don't want to like the movie" bollocks? Cage is a mediocre actor at best, he's got no range whatsoever beyond being sullen and slow, he's one great performance was in Leaving Las Vegas which he deservedly won his only ever oscar or nomination! That's only because the parted suited him down to a tee! But he's hugely miscast as Johnny blaze, he's way too old for the part and looks nothing like the comic character.

But very little of that has anything to do with the bad reviews this film is getting. You giys simply don't want to accept people don't like crap cheesy movies and that's exactly what most comic book films are, this one especially! It's based on a stupid concept, a guy riding a flaming motorbike with a flaming skull... only in a dumb comic book will you find readers un-demanding enough to swallow that one without thinking WTF? The average cinemagoer despite the huge majority of them being basic popcorn lovers with a range of comedy, action comedy, action film only, still won't find anything appealing about a comic book movie about a hells angel look-a-like who changes into a flaming skull on a bike that's on fire.. it's just plain STUPID!

You guys just gotta understand that not every comic book character is suitable to adapt to a decent movie with mass appeal. Most comic book characters are silly, some can be adapted to be more appealing with slight changes but they are far and few between. Just because you like the comic doesn't mean everyone else is gonna like a movie of it! In Ghost Riders case, even the comic barely sells or carries any huge popularity so why the hell they want to make a movie for is beyond common sense!
shroud
shroud - 2/17/2012, 11:05 AM
i think nick cage didn't fit ghost rider from the get go , kinda scared to see this second one don't want to waste my 11 bucks
Ceejay
Ceejay - 2/17/2012, 11:15 AM
13% on Rottentomatoes!!! My god even Green Lantern didn't score that low!
ScootyPuffJr
ScootyPuffJr - 2/17/2012, 11:33 AM
@WhinyBitch I agree wholeheartedly. Movies shouldn't be juvenile and play only to the lowest common denominator. I demand intelligent CBMs!!! VIVA LA REVOLUCION!!!
AlexDeLarge87
AlexDeLarge87 - 2/17/2012, 12:46 PM
Good review. Thanks for making it.

I knew the special effects ends up to be the best part of the whole film.

They should have rebooted it and give it makers who have some [frick]ing talent.
JohnTom88
JohnTom88 - 2/17/2012, 3:25 PM
Of course GL didn't score that low because it has $200 million production budget and the full sanction of DC Comics.

GR: SOV got sub-100 million budget and Sony, who should be working not too lose the rights, doesn't even fully support it
croniccris
croniccris - 2/17/2012, 4:53 PM
[frick]ING ASSHOLES WHEN WILL I GET A GHOST RIDER MOVIE SHOWING HOW GREAT OF A CHARACTER HE ACTUALLY IS!!!!
1 2
View Recorder