Krang 2012 Update #2

lol

@AndrewNDB

sorry to disappoint



"Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles was created in an American comic book published by Mirage Studios in 1984..."

@ Jollem indeed they may have been but boris is awesome. well kinda.

@ REDSTORM . dude that is one of the best pics iv ever seen
i cant work out which one Krang is tho .. is it the left or the right????

@ REDSTORM . it is epically awesome. Krang looks pretty offended and i cant blame him as i reach for the acid eye wash.

its true what they say .. some things you cant un-see.

Cthulhu 2012

Krang is better than the choices we currently have.

@Marxman12 - I don't believe Obama was born in the United States. You can find the videos on youtube, but in short: his birth certificate was created in a photoshop-like program, his draft card is fraudulent and unlike any others received the same month and year by the same post office AND all of the immigration records for ALL immigrants are missing from the National Archives for the year and month that his father supposedly immigrated to the U.S. His social security number is from Connecticut, despite no records of him ever having lived there, and has been red flagged and black listed so that even police cannot pull up information on it. It's a pretty large set of "coincidences." He spent 30 million or so dollars he spent in court costs and lawyer fees to keep from releasing the certificate, etc. Additionally, he lived in the foreign student dorms in college and without his college records, which he has also spent money to keep hidden, you cannot prove that he attended as a U.S. citizen. There are also records of members of the media (news programs, radio, newspapers, etc.) receiving threats that they would essentially be shut down/harassed by groups like the FCC if they gave the issue of his citizenship any consideration. That's only the tip of the iceberg.

I am not advocating Romney, because I am not a fan of his either. I am just saying that there is too much information for the issue to be considered settled by anyone who has done any sort of research on the issue past "well, he put the certificate on the White House website, case closed."

i want to see his birth certificate

Hopefully there wont be anymore updates...since this is not funny and a waste of front page material.

@ BuckyCap "I don't believe Obama was born in the United States. You can find the videos on youtube..."

You just lost any tiny, minuscule bit of credibility you had. YouTube as your reference? Really? With that mind set apparently we never landed on the moon, Slender Man is real, and if you put a cell phone in a microwave it turns into a blood curdling alien.

@Stumblin- funny the only thing you address is the youtube video reference not the Connecticut ssn or any other poing Buckycap made.

I'm well aware the TMNT are comic book characters. Krang, however, is not.

There was a question? All I read was an opinion and statement. Nothing else.

You mentioned about his other references...which he didn't give any. All he gave was regurgitated BS.

@Stumblin - *Sigh* No, saying "go check Youtube for videos" isn't the equivalent of saying Slenderman is real. Using your logic, Wonderland is real because it comes from a book and "A Brief History of Time" is also a book. Don't be ignorant.

I was referring to the videos released as part of an investigation by a team of professionals put together by an Arizona County Sheriff.

This video is a consolidation of several videos they have released:


This video came from one of several press conferences given by them that was covered by the national media:



Here is a documentary about the investigation which includes interviews with some of the investigators as well as further explanation of the evidence:


Again, just the tip of the iceberg.

@Stumblin - No, I don't get your point. Your point is that information is substantiated through the medium in which it is presented. That is obviously false. You have to apply some critical thinking skills to analyze what you are looking at no matter how it is presented.

You are mistaken in your assertion that the SOURCE of the videos on YouTube IS YouTube. YouTube is merely a means of redistributing the videos. For example: a bibliography would list the documentary I posted as a reference, not YouTube, although the web address where the video was found might be included depending on the writing style.

Obama's policies and other political issues weren't being discussed. The information surrounding his birth was being discussed. I have retrieved and presented the information for you, if you want to be willfully ignorant, that is your problem.

How does the issue of Obama's eligibility to be president NOT hold water? This isn't an examination of footage or photographs with subjective analysis and opinions. This is examination of the actual documents released by the White House and Barack Obama using the same objective methods used to test other documents for authenticity.

The group conducting the investigation is a group entirely made up of VOLUNTEERS (http://www.mcso.org/About/Posse.aspx). Volunteers do not get paid for their work. None of them are getting paid for investigating this case. Apparently, you missed some key pieces of information in the article you listed...

"The majority of that cost went to the deputy's salary, benefits, and overtime WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN INCURRED REGARDLESS OF THE TRIP." The only thing taxpayers of Arizona paid for that they otherwise wouldn't have is the $3,000+ trip to Hawaii. But...

"The Sheriff's office says Arpaio supporters tried to pay for it but the county commission declined the offer." Sounds like he didn't decide to do anything with taxpayer money. The board of county commissioners decided for him.

Copy/Pasting news articles doesn't mean much if you aren't able to read them and understand them. Nothing you posted said that he decided to use taxpayer money as part of this investigation or that taxpayer money was the source of funding for the investigation.

Considering that the taxpayers are the ones who asked him to conduct the investigation, I don't think that they have much of a problem with having paid for the trip to Hawaii. There have been many pieces of legislation in Arizona, introduced and supported by elected representatives, that requires conclusive evidence of eligibility to run for federal office in order to be on the ballot in the state. Many other states have introduced or passed similar legislation. There seems to be many taxpayers in Arizona and other parts of the country with similar concerns that are being addressed by the Sheriff.

You can continue to attack the investigators as though it changes the results of the investigation. It does not. Insults aren't a substitute for supporting evidence in "serious debate." How about you come back when you have something more substantive to say?

@Stumblin - You aren't arguing. You are just saying "nuh-uh" and trying to insult whoever you can. You aren't rebutting any information being presented either because you can't or are too ignorant on the subject to present information to validate your beliefs.

I'll try explaining this for you again using your blog example. If a blog re-posted a study, then your source would be THE STUDY, NOT THE BLOG. The blog would simply be listed as where you found the study.

I said "check out YouTube" because that is where the videos appear and are easily found. I assume individuals are capable of finding valid information on their own.

Re-read what the author of the article typed. The money that went towards the officer's salary was going to be spent on the officer's salary regardless of where he was or what he was doing. The Sheriff Deputy's job is to do whatever the Sheriff needs him to do. They aren't like typical cops. They don't operate the same way local and even state cops operate. You might disagree with what he had the deputy do, but Sheriff Arpaio has been re-elected every single year since taking office, so apparently the people paying the officer like how Arpaio operates.

Oh, you are a taxpayer of Maricopa County, Arizona? No? Well then it doesn't matter what you asked or didn't ask him to do because you aren't a taxpayer there. The people who are taxpayers there formed a petition for him to take up the case.

Do YOU know what attack means? attack - "to direct unfavorable criticism against; criticize severely; argue with strongly"

"That sheriff is a joke and so is who ever supports his claims."

.....

I never said copying/pasting was good or bad, I simply said it doesn't mean much if you don't understand or comprehend the articles which you are listing, which you clearly did not.

They DID find it was fraudulent. What the hell do you think I have been saying this entire time? His birth certificate was a computer forgery. His draft card was also forged (they proved it and recreated how it was manufactured). They show both in the first of the videos that you refuse to watch.

They didn't say "well it COULD be done on a computer," they took the actual file released by the White House to the public and showed how it was manufactured and demonstrated how an actual scanned file should have appeared in image software. They also breakdown common counter-claims used by those who insist the document is authentic by demonstrating the difference between an actual scanned birth certificate and a computer-manufactured one.

This is what happens when you criticize something without educating yourself on the topic.