Fake but Funny

Fake but Funny

According to Wikipedia, Spiderman: Shattered Dimensions, is going to be more like Batman: Arkham Asylum!

Scoop
By superotherside - Jun 30, 2010 07:06 AM EST
Filed Under: Video Games
Source: Wikipedia

Otherside: This is of course totally fake, but I thought it was really funny. This gives me another good reason not to trust Wikipedia! Just read the last sentence!

Plot

A mysterious artifact called the Tablet of Order and Chaos gets shattered into four pieces, creating problems with reality. A mystic within the Amazing Universe, who is confirmed to not be a current or former Sorcerer Supreme,[1] will tell Spider-Man how he can fix this, by going into three different dimensions (aside from his own), get help from the different Spider-Men in each dimension, and recover the tablet fragment in each.
The game will feature appearances from characters such as Kraven the Hunter, Noir versions of Hammerhead and the Green Goblin, and the first appearance of the 2099 version of Hobgoblin.[1][2] As of Puly 94th 2011 it has been confirmed that an Evil version of Batman will be the fourth dimension

Spiderman: Shattered Dimensions Spiderman Noir


Batman - Arkham Asylum

Well as this one says do you think that in the future (this being 2010 not 2011) Batman might be revealed to be a villain? Yeah, well sorry guys for wasting your time but this was too funny to pass up.

A MINECRAFT MOVIE: New Trailer And Poster Confirm The Movie Is Basically JUMANJI With Blocks
Related:

A MINECRAFT MOVIE: New Trailer And Poster Confirm The Movie Is Basically JUMANJI With Blocks
Lionsgate CEO Admits Everything That Could Go Wrong Did Go Wrong With BORDERLANDS Box Office Flop
Recommended For You:

Lionsgate CEO Admits "Everything That Could Go Wrong Did Go Wrong" With BORDERLANDS Box Office Flop

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Do you have what it takes to write for us?
Want to contribute?
superotherside
superotherside - 6/30/2010, 7:41 AM
oh no need to check out to see if it's true or not because on Wikipedia they already took it off as no official info

it was just a funny catch i made and wanted to share with u guys...

yeah but who would win all four spidey's or good ol' bat's?
superotherside
superotherside - 6/30/2010, 7:53 AM
this was just too funny to pass up too



give this one a watch it's worth it... oh and hopefully Activision was listening!

go spidey!
Destroyer14
Destroyer14 - 6/30/2010, 8:01 AM
Amazing how anyone can just edit official information.
superotherside
superotherside - 6/30/2010, 8:33 AM
@destroyer14 yep ain't it though? but Wikipedia at least did take it off with in a few minutes... so they r doing a better job
thegreek
thegreek - 6/30/2010, 9:48 AM
Dude you will be surprised... They use WIKI as a ref for alot of what they are saying.... Ridiculous crap
Paulley
Paulley - 6/30/2010, 9:53 AM
Wikipedia isnt official its a collection of millions of peoples knowledge rolled up to one place.. anyone can edit and add to this bucket of knowledge because they are supposed to.

I used to contribute quite alot to wikipedia back in its infancy (hell if you look back on the contributions of many minor comics characters and wrestlers from 5 years ago you will see my name alot )... i never understood why users felt like they need to vandalize articles.. accidental mistakes or adding information that isnt properly sourced is one thing.. but to purposely sabotage information.. why?

Anyway if your taking any info from wiki always... ALWAYS... look at the articles history and check the last few edits were not made by Anon users.
WOLVERINEDECADE
WOLVERINEDECADE - 6/30/2010, 10:15 AM
speaking of Wikipedia, may i add that almost weeks before Iron Man 2 came out, wikipedia (ofcourse) already had a column there, and would you believe me that the character RDJ would play (as what was written there) isn't Tony Stark? what i mean is that they misplaced the name "Tony Stark" with another name, (sorry i forgot which particular name, but way too far from the name Tony Stark). i got frustrated and furious so i decided then to edit the whole article, i edited every name w/c supposedly is RDJ's character and changed them all to TONY STARK. I dont know if its just me who saw that big disgrace to Iron Man, but since then, i dont trust wikipedia anymore.
Paulley
Paulley - 6/30/2010, 12:51 PM
you most likely could have rolled back the page to a version that wasnt vandalized
Related Headlines
Latest Headlines

Hot Headlines Hot Headlines

Sci-Fi & Fantasy

Anime & Manga

Gaming

Horror

Cartoons & Animated Features

Action Movies & TV

Pro Wrestling & MMA News
View Recorder