THE MARVELS' Game-Changing Post-Credits Scene Has LEAKED Online

THE MARVELS' Game-Changing Post-Credits Scene Has LEAKED Online

It's time to be very careful on social media because The Marvels' post-credits scene has leaked online right as the Captain Marvel sequel begins landing in theaters overseas. Read on for details...

By JoshWilding - Nov 08, 2023 06:11 AM EST
Filed Under: The Marvels

It's hard to say how this has happened so quickly, but The Marvels' game-changing post-credits scene has already leaked online. 

We won't be sharing the footage here but it isn't hard to find. As you're likely already aware, it does indeed feature a massive MCU cameo which is likely to have huge ramifications for the Multiverse Saga moving forward. 

What we can say is that the response online to the scene has been overwhelmingly positive and, while there will no doubt be much more to the Captain Marvel sequel than this, if you haven't booked your tickets yet...well, we'd suggest doing so now.

We'll be bringing you an in-depth recap of the scene soon, but in the meantime, be very careful about where you look online, especially if you don't want to be spoiled. For example, we first encountered the stinger on Twitter/X while simply searching for "The Marvels." 

Disney does appear to be taking down the leaks where possible and a moment as huge as this one really is enjoyed best on the big screen. 

Rumours about the cameo first started doing the rounds online last week, with several "scoopers" dropping hints on social media. It didn't take long to figure out what they were talking about and descriptions have been floating around ever since (as the movie is now in theaters overseas, you can read a brief description here). 

An entire plot breakdown from a test screening is still sitting on Reddit, though it makes no mention of this cameo, suggesting the scene was heavily edited to avoid spoilers from leaking. However, with The Marvels on track for a so-so opening weekend, it's hard not to wonder whether last week's leaks were deliberate. 

The footage floating around online, however, has been pirated and it seemingly coming from press screenings is shocking. It's only today that the sequel has begun rolling out internationally, and one of the videos we saw is subtitled, so a theater chain overseas may well have jumped the gun. Between this and the fact some outlets - Variety - drop major spoilers in reviews, is it time for Marvel Studios to start saving these stingers for opening day? 

That's up for debate, but you have been warned: if you're looking to avoid spoilers, now would be a good time to take a break from Twitter/X, Instagram, TikTok, and even YouTube. Rest assured, though, anything shared here on ComicBookMovie.com will be spoiler-tagged (meaning you won't see anything you don't want to). 

The Marvels arrives in theaters on Friday; preview screenings begin tomorrow in the U.S.

THE MARVELS Star Brie Larson Says She Always Reaches Out With Advice When Someone Lands A Superhero Role
Related:

THE MARVELS Star Brie Larson Says She Always Reaches Out With Advice When Someone Lands A Superhero Role

THE MARVELS Ended Up Losing More Money Than THE FLASH After Disappointing 2023 For Superhero Movies
Recommended For You:

THE MARVELS Ended Up Losing More Money Than THE FLASH After Disappointing 2023 For Superhero Movies

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4 5
AllsGood
AllsGood - 11/8/2023, 6:50 AM
Let's hope the Social Media Reactions stay True. Miracles Do Happen :)

AllsGood
AllsGood - 11/8/2023, 6:52 AM
@AllsGood - THE MARVELS Hailed As "Exactly What a Comic Book Movie Should Be" In First Social Media Reactions.
AllsGood
AllsGood - 11/8/2023, 7:18 AM
@AllsGood - Early viewers for The Marvels say it is an absolute blast! The cast's chemistry is out of this world, and the movie captures the heart and charm of Marvel comics.
WhateverItTakes
WhateverItTakes - 11/8/2023, 7:38 AM
@AllsGood - calm down doubled
Feralwookiee
Feralwookiee - 11/8/2023, 8:18 AM
@AllsGood - I give you credit DoubleD; you're a consistent shill. 🤣

How much stock do you own in Disney, seriously?
AllsGood
AllsGood - 11/8/2023, 8:18 AM
@Feralwookiee - Yes, I do own Stock in Disney.
Feralwookiee
Feralwookiee - 11/8/2023, 8:23 AM
@AllsGood - It better be TONS they way you shill for them my man!

Is this Bob Iger's sock account? 😝
malschla
malschla - 11/8/2023, 8:55 AM
@AllsGood - Disney’s stock is down for the last 1, 2 and 5 years… you have to go back to 2014 to find it trading this low.
AllsGood
AllsGood - 11/8/2023, 9:08 AM
@malschla - YES but still higher than when I bought it.
AllsGood
AllsGood - 11/8/2023, 10:25 AM
@AllsGood - We just saw #TheMarvels - full review tomorrow, but it’s one of the most surprising movies of the year, bringing fresh air to the MCU, as well as some jaw dropping moments that will have audiences screaming. Don’t sleep on this movie! - Connor Webber/Attractions Magazine
malschla
malschla - 11/8/2023, 10:27 AM
@AllsGood - Good thing you deleted the part of your comment where you say that "the stock always goes up"... it would suck to have evidence of being incorrect.
AllsGood
AllsGood - 11/8/2023, 11:16 AM
@malschla - Never went below the Purchase Price.
malschla
malschla - 11/8/2023, 11:32 AM
@AllsGood - Yes, but that wasn't what you originally stated.
dagenspear
dagenspear - 11/8/2023, 7:00 PM
@AllsGood - Why hope that? What does it really matter whether it stays true or doesn't?
Gizmoduck
Gizmoduck - 11/8/2023, 7:44 PM
@malschla - its consistently in the 80s, back in 2021 it was at a high, past 10 years its up and down in the 80s - not really cause for concern
malschla
malschla - 11/9/2023, 9:44 AM
@Gizmoduck - A stock price that is roughly at the same price it was ten years ago means it is stagnant. It depends on what you mean by “concern”, but I certainly wouldn’t invest unless they show they can turn it around. The only saving grace here is that they will likely get purchased at a slight premium by a better run company.
CapA
CapA - 11/9/2023, 1:21 PM
@AllsGood - "Exactly what a comic book movie used to be in the 90s" (garbage)
SauronthePower
SauronthePower - 11/10/2023, 5:03 AM
@malschla - and this is a good thing

A true, and necessary, market correction

re: the stock trading at historic lows
SauronthePower
SauronthePower - 11/10/2023, 5:06 AM
@CapA - it wasn’t as bad as all that

Movie was legit fun and delivered FAR above the negative expectations (much of which were fed by this very site) I had going in

Lower mid-tier MCU flick that moves briskly and contains some infectious fun
malschla
malschla - 11/10/2023, 8:18 AM
@SauronthePower - Market corrections are part of the story, but only a small part in the case of Disney. It accounts for maybe 20% of the drop. The reality is that they are being passed by competition in nearly every sector of their business. They are no longer the gold standard and people know it. It’s not dissimilar to what happened in the automotive industry a few decades ago. Old kings are dethroned when they get complacent.
SauronthePower
SauronthePower - 11/10/2023, 12:25 PM
@malschla - its pretyy complicated vs the Eisner/Boesky years 35 years ago vs the Ovitz years 25 years ago vs Chapek’s reign of terror

Chapek pricing out the brand did FAR more damage in an exponentially quick timespan, than unadaptable archaic corporate structures

The Gold Standard years were marked by Disney University which counseled, and consequently molded, other corporations into the image of branding through customer loyalty through top shelf perception and work fliw of the company

That pleasent experience at any-and-all costs went completely off the ledge with Chapek’s ‘Pay More/Get-More’ horseshit micropricing every little upgrade to the point of unsustainability.

The Mouse went from an industry bellwether to an industry pariah in just south of 3 years because a corporate dunce who made his bones constricting margins on park’s operations attempted to macro-bully that over the entire company

Apple is often mentioned as one of those ‘better run companies,’ and the reason they have gotten that is because Jobs, like Walt, Roy, Eisner before him, both placed onus on company reputation, customer satisfaction (this is where compromise becomes a very real ‘thing’), top-shelf ‘Boughe’ (if you will) brand perception which would, in turn, lead to zeitgeist industry standing and its resultant brand loyalty

Chapek looked at the data, crunched the numbers, turned up the heat on the margins, deduced and declared himself the smartest guy in the room, and comicly managed to incinerate the entire Disney brand within 20 months, ALL over the iridescent allure offered by the temptation of a few shiny extra shekels
malschla
malschla - 11/11/2023, 2:11 PM
@SauronthePower - I’m very familiar. I’m a product of Disney’s corporate education. They were fantastically run organization and now they are not. It’s just that simple. As they say, it’s not rocket surgery.
SauronthePower
SauronthePower - 11/11/2023, 3:46 PM
@malschla - agree and its such a shame

If I had to posit, I would say that they went from absolute loyalty, fidelity, and deference to Walt’s original brand quality dictates to overreliance on shareholder buy-in and then attempting to appease said shareholders (or at least overcorrections to avoid the optics of controversy) as opposed to ‘you buy the Disney beand, we don’t buy into your whims…’ which led to a complete dilution of the brand
ShimmyShimmyYA
ShimmyShimmyYA - 11/8/2023, 6:50 AM
They were interesting for sure
nightwing2090
nightwing2090 - 11/8/2023, 6:57 AM
The scene did give me hope for Marvel and its fans
Origame
Origame - 11/8/2023, 6:58 AM
I mean, it's exactly as what they mentioned about the scene before.

Really not game changing. Especially after no way home and MoM.
mountainman
mountainman - 11/8/2023, 9:12 AM
@Origame - I do think he embodies the character well and think the new look is cool (besides a little uncanny valley with the CGI).

That being said, the scene wasn’t that interesting and I’m still not paying to see this.
UniqNo
UniqNo - 11/8/2023, 9:36 AM
@mountainman - Yeah, even with the bad quality, the CGI is shit. Surely for that scene it would have been cheaper to have Grammer in make up. There's no action there where they'd need a digital double or even a dtunt double... if it was cheaper..then yeah....those VFX artist are severely underpaid..hopefully he appears in person for Deadpool.

I am glad we're getting more Xmen though..
mountainman
mountainman - 11/8/2023, 9:43 AM
@UniqNo - I think Kelsey Grammar was the perfect casting for the character back in the day. But…he is too old now. Hypothetically they could just have the character in scientist mode with no action and it could work, but he may not want to deal with the hours of makeup.

I’m tentatively excited for Deadpool 3. MCU has been so hit or miss lately and I’m a bit afraid this overarching multiverse plot may hurt it. I wish it was simply a mutant focused movie, but we won’t really know if it can be pulled off until we see more from it.

It is crazy how the MCU CGI characters used to look so good and they all just look off in a way. Like they aren’t really in the scene and there is this weird uncanny valley.

I’m sure it has something to do with not giving the CGI studios enough time to work on it.
UniqNo
UniqNo - 11/8/2023, 9:55 AM
@mountainman - Grammat can still do all the non action scenes though and still be around for the dialogue heavy stuff and close ups. Stunt man can fill the gaps. The make up im sure there's better at these days. He'll judt need the neck up. And hands and feet. We csn live with him suited up otherwise.

Yesh, but to me if deadpool has a good movie under all the obligatory fox cameos it has great potential with it being R rated. Fingers crossed though
Vigor
Vigor - 11/8/2023, 10:29 AM
@Origame - even after MOM and no way home, comments even here from people were still confused about where this was all going

This post credit scene makes it obvious as 1 + 1
Since so many people are saying things aren't connected and marvel lost its way, etc. Marvel needed to spell things out like to a third grader for the lowest common denominator
Origame
Origame - 11/8/2023, 10:33 AM
@Vigor - ...I really don't know what this is confirming that wasn't made clear elsewhere.

Ffs, the marvels isn't even the first to bring up incursions. That's from MoM.

Honestly the only bit that's confusing is who the villain is, but that isn't cleared up here and is only a question because of the majors situation.
Vigor
Vigor - 11/8/2023, 11:12 AM
@Origame - incursions in MoM was vaguely shown and described. Made sense to me. But a lot of ghr general audience aren't getting this concept.
The marvels literally shows another universe bleeding into ours. No way home had a cool way of showing villains falling into ours but the marvels really drives it home.

But that's just 1 part of the multiverse sagas plot. It's not just incursions. It's also what marvel is doing with the xmen they got from fox studios. The marvels makes it painfully clear. I think ant man 3 tried to explain Kang and the council of kangs but it fell flat. There needs to be more explanation needed for Kang. Loki season 2 obviously is adding to the mythos.

But perhaps it will be Deadpool 3 that gives us more about tva and why we should worry about the council of kangs

I feel it's all starting to make sense. And it's a lot. Incursions. Xmen. Other dimensions (dark, quantum). Alternate versions of our heroes. Kang
It's honestly a tall order to explain this story to the casual watcher. They Have their work cut out for them. Especially since understanding it requires someone watch both movies and TV content
Origame
Origame - 11/8/2023, 11:20 AM
@Vigor - ...we literally see two universes bleeding into each other in MoM. If the general audience isn't getting it there, then I really don't know what this helps with. Especially since this is a post credits scene, which has always been for fans not the general public.

And you say this about the Foxmen characters when we literally got Patrick Stewart as Charles Xavier in MoM. Not only that but we know Deadpool 3 is still coming with Hugh Jackman as wolverine.
Vigor
Vigor - 11/8/2023, 11:31 AM
@Origame - when Xavier died people rioted because they offer Patrick Stewart. Not realizing that he's one Xavier of probably thousands. That's what I'm saying people aren't getting. They're not seeing the BIG picture.

Anyway I think if people didn't get it then, they surely should get it now
Origame
Origame - 11/8/2023, 11:38 AM
@Vigor - ...and this literally doesn't help with that, because we can't tell from this clip if it's the foxmen beast or another variant.

And again, really don't see that being the case. Closest thing is if we see what that credits scene is leading directly to, but that's not this movie helping us.
Vigor
Vigor - 11/8/2023, 11:45 AM
@Origame - good chat Rogiv
Origame
Origame - 11/8/2023, 12:59 PM
@Vigor - you too emagiro.
dagenspear
dagenspear - 11/8/2023, 6:58 PM
@Vigor - Or they think it's dumb. Using him doesn't mean anything if it's not the one we know. I think the big picture is dumb if that's what it is.
SauronthePower
SauronthePower - 11/10/2023, 5:08 AM
@Vigor - stated far better than I ever could have
1 2 3 4 5

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder