No Former Cast Members To Return In Daredevil; Confusion Over Rights Cleared Up!

No Former Cast Members To Return In Daredevil; Confusion Over Rights Cleared Up!

Despite the David Slade directed flick being called a continuation rather than a reboot, a new report confirms that no previous cast members will return, while another reveals how Fox held on to the rights for so long...

By JoshWilding - Mar 16, 2011 12:03 PM EST
Filed Under: Daredevil

While it was pretty obvious that former stars Ben Affleck, Jennifer Garner and Colin Farrell (to name just a few) would not be back in their respective roles for the new movie, EW have now confirmed it, as you can see in the following excerpt from the site:

Director David Slade has signed on to direct a new Daredevil movie that will continue the story of the blind superhero established in 2003′s Daredevil, but feature a brand new cast (i.e., no Ben Affleck or Jennifer Garner).


Meanwhile, in something that was missed in last nights report from Variety, the site reveals how Fox were able to hold on to the rights without having made a movie for seven years. For anyone hoping to see any of the characters not owned by Marvel Studios reverting back to them, I think this makes it clear that it's not something we'll see happen any time soon!

Fox retained "Daredevil" rights by keeping the project in development over the years; had it not, rights would've reverted to Marvel Studios, which Disney acquired for $4 billion in 2009. Same goes for "Fantastic Four," for which Fox is eyeing new installments.


Pretty crafty, eh? Can't blame them for not wanting to lose potentially multi-million dollar franchises though, and with Fox seemingly turning over a new leaf when it comes to comic book movies, it might not be a bad thing to have more than just Marvel Studios making these things!




Image and video hosting by TinyPic



DAREDEVIL: BORN AGAIN & IRONHEART Trailers Screen At Disney Upfronts - Here's A Breakdown Of What Was Shown
Related:

DAREDEVIL: BORN AGAIN & IRONHEART Trailers Screen At Disney Upfronts - Here's A Breakdown Of What Was Shown

DAREDEVIL: BORN AGAIN And IRONHEART Get Official Premiere Dates And New Logos
Recommended For You:

DAREDEVIL: BORN AGAIN And IRONHEART Get Official Premiere Dates And New Logos

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
Exiles
Exiles - 3/16/2011, 12:09 PM
so there going the Incredible Hulk route more or less. And wasn't it a known fact that long as they said it was in development Marvel would never get it back
CaptainAmerica
CaptainAmerica - 3/16/2011, 12:10 PM
Lol your gonna make some people cry round here
SmokinIndo
SmokinIndo - 3/16/2011, 12:10 PM
So Fox can keep the rights as long as they say "oh yeah... we're looking at the potential possibility of maybe making a film sometime within the next 50 years or so."

That's [frick]ed up.
AlexdoxA
AlexdoxA - 3/16/2011, 12:10 PM
Let them go already!!! Come on!! How cool it would be to have cap or at least a nod to the avengers like in the arc they are supposedly basing this picture on?
LucasMend
LucasMend - 3/16/2011, 12:10 PM
I saying, FOX people are like little demons, with their little plans, to keep the rights, OH god FOX.
Exiles
Exiles - 3/16/2011, 12:13 PM
all the FF news had died down aswell, all the rumours about the Thing being CGI, the movie being titled fantastic four reborn.
ironknight
ironknight - 3/16/2011, 12:16 PM
I think that they'll end up doing the same thing with the Fantastic Four. (Letting us think Marvels going to get them back and announce a director at the last second)
selinakyle
selinakyle - 3/16/2011, 12:17 PM
This guy directed Twilight: Eclipse. I just lost a little hope.
BobGarlen
BobGarlen - 3/16/2011, 12:18 PM
if it's a continuation fo the '03 DD Directors Cut, then i guess the best course fo Action is Casey Affleck because he kinda looks like ben and is a decent actor
thunderforce
thunderforce - 3/16/2011, 12:18 PM
Sounds like we need a botcott marvel properties til they go back , or at the very least until they join the marvel movie universe .
PaulRom
PaulRom - 3/16/2011, 12:19 PM
I don't get how the cast is being replaced entirely but still a sequel to 2003 Daredevil. That's like what killed the original Batman series with Schumaker...they replaced Two-Face and Batman (twice).
I hope Marvel gets F4 back, that way we'll be a bit closer to a Civil War movie.
thatiscrazy
thatiscrazy - 3/16/2011, 12:22 PM
Twilight + FOX = EPIC FAIL

On another note, just saw teaser trailor for conan.
Some one should post it on CBM if they haven't already.
RedeyeJedi
RedeyeJedi - 3/16/2011, 12:24 PM
Marvel sold the rights to Fox. C'mon people! Who cares If they ever get the rights back. How many of you were supporting O.J. Simpson when he wanted that sports memorabilia that HE SOLD back.
fanboy76
fanboy76 - 3/16/2011, 12:28 PM
thats some shady shite... like saying hey that drill i borrowed..im still using it so you cant have it back right now..meanwhile 10 years later that fokker still has my damn drill...give it back you Ahole.
Cross
Cross - 3/16/2011, 12:29 PM
BatLantern
BatLantern - 3/16/2011, 12:32 PM
Marvel had to sell they were bankrupt
superotherside
superotherside - 3/16/2011, 12:33 PM
fox will mess it up no matter what... please marvel just buy back the rights to all your characters!

else wise it's sure to:
comicbookjerk
comicbookjerk - 3/16/2011, 12:34 PM
Well that kinda sucjs i want MArvel to have all the rights to anything marvel for years Fox has been screwing fans over and So Has Sony After they decided to reboot Spiderman I am some what angry No Wolverine or spiderman can ever appear in the avengers now and thats really screwed up!
Cross
Cross - 3/16/2011, 12:35 PM
And what the [frick] is up with the director giving this fake stare in every single picture. Trying to be badass or something?
vermillion
vermillion - 3/16/2011, 12:37 PM
This could still turn out to be good, Fox or Marvel, I don't care if the film is good.

If it is based on Born Again, that's a good sign. :D No ben affleck or jennifer garner already makes this film a whole lot better.
croniccris
croniccris - 3/16/2011, 12:38 PM
turning a new leaf lol good one josh
supyrman
supyrman - 3/16/2011, 12:39 PM
Hulk goes to Incredible Hulk
The Punisher becomes Punisher: Warzone
Spiderman (trilogy) becomes The Amazing Spiderman
now Dare Devil.

We may notice the pattern of Marvel films that aren't reboots or sequels, but still continuations that form their own world based on the ashes of the previously established. Hmm...
Cross
Cross - 3/16/2011, 12:40 PM
HARD CANDY SUCKED! PLUS THIS DUDE DIRECTED A [frick]ING TWILIGHT MOVIE. DAREDEVIL IS DOOMED.
BlackSands
BlackSands - 3/16/2011, 12:41 PM
FRAK FOX!
Justice
Justice - 3/16/2011, 12:41 PM
Patrick Wilson, I'm not sure, at least Affleck looked the part! And shouldn't they wait, until someone comes along with the right story?

A Story that actually makes sense. And they said, they wanted new cast! How's that going to work? Are they going to confuse us again, with the chainging of cast? I believe so.
Justice
Justice - 3/16/2011, 12:45 PM
No offesne to the guy, but I don't need Twlight evil blah princess sitting next to me in the movie theater. It's like waht they once said about the reboot of Spider-Man, "This will appeal to the Twlight Fans as well," end quote. And if that was true, witch i would hope not, It would be a war between us: who are Spider-Man fans, who are still loyal to the chracter and the: Evil, Pycotic, sprakly Twlight fans.

Blahhh, leaves a bad taste in my mouth already.
CapFan79
CapFan79 - 3/16/2011, 12:47 PM
Let's see some pics or a trailer before giving too much hate. If it looks like GL then we can hate.

I love DD and thought the first film was okay for the time, but since we've had Batman Begins, TDK, The Incredible Hulk and Iron Man, etc so it doesn't hold up so good.

Since Fox has the rights to DD, X-Men, F4, Silver Surfer and others why don't they create their own Marvel/Fox universe? I mean you could have an epic film with Dr. Doom, Magneto and Kingpin and Bullseye and have Silver Surfer, DD and maybe The Thing and re-introduce Cyclops again or something! They could really take advantage if they want.

I know Sony can't use Kingpin and some other characters for Spider-Man because of Fox and DD. Why doesn't Fox use them?
ollyollyolly
ollyollyolly - 3/16/2011, 12:55 PM
If done correctly, with time and money well invested, this film could be good. its fox so it could go either way.

im worried this will simply be a blip on the movie calendar. DD deserves far more than that.

Bradley Cooper for DD. auditioned for GL and could be persuaded to lead the line and make the role his own considering his current star power.
kirbyfan
kirbyfan - 3/16/2011, 12:56 PM
We'll see, personally I want Marvel in charge of thier characters!
LunarLt
LunarLt - 3/16/2011, 1:02 PM
i would like to see Michael C Hall as Matt Murdock/Daredevil
SKGannbit
SKGannbit - 3/16/2011, 1:03 PM
this is total garbage. the way fox is handling this is completely uncalled for. i understand that they spent a lot of money to buy the rights to these characters but if you can't put it to use then give it up! don't hold on to the character and make up bull sh!t excuses just so you don't lose the rights to it. make the damn movie or give him back to marvel. the fans deserve a quality movie already.
RockNRollCC
RockNRollCC - 3/16/2011, 1:08 PM
[frick] Fox

[frick]ing uncreative, greedy [foo foo]s
UltimateSpiderman
UltimateSpiderman - 3/16/2011, 1:15 PM
Daredevil should get it's own news button. Why the [frick] does Hulk still have one?
TheNameIsBetty
TheNameIsBetty - 3/16/2011, 1:25 PM
I liked the original Daredevil movie. It was awesome.
I think Fox MIGHT can pull this off, but it's true that Marvel should own it. I wish we could whine our way into getting it done :P

1 2
View Recorder